Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Logical oddities and locutional scarcities

Another attack upon methods of revelation

  • Articles
  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of California, Berkeley

    Herman Tennessen

Authors
  1. Herman Tennessen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This article may be conceived as a follow-up on my articles in Synthese, ‘The Fight Against Revelation’, Synthese, Vol. VIII, Issue 2, Nos. 3–5, and ‘Evidence and Illustration’, Synthese, Vol. XI, No. 1. Cf. also Campbell Crockett's adequate account and brilliant analysis of methods of revelation versus empirical procedures in his ‘An Attack Upon Revelation’, Journal of Philosophy, Vol. LVI, No. 3, and Tennessen and Gullvåg: Logical Analyses and Definiteness of Intention, pp. 1–7, Oslo, 1955.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tennessen, H. Logical oddities and locutional scarcities. Synthese 11, 369–388 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00486198

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00486198

Search

Navigation