Skip to main content
Log in

On the irreducibility of the will

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper criticizes the thesis that intending to do something is reducible to some combination of beliefs and desires. Against Audi's recent formulation of such a view I offer as counterexample a case wherein an agent who wants and expects to V has not yet decided whether to V and hence does not yet intend to. I try to show that whereas belief that one will V is not necessary for intending to V, as illustrated in cases of desperate attempts to V, one cannot intend to V without preferring to V (rather than not V) and thus one cannot intend to V without, in some sense, wanting to V (at least wanting it in preference to not V-ing). The connection of one's intentions with one's objectives, attempts, plans, and hopes is briefly treated, and some influential work by Davidson is criticized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Audi, R.: 1986, ‘Intending, Intentional Action and Desire’, in Marks (1986), pp. 17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, M.: 1980, Intending and Acting, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratman, M.: 1985, ‘Davidson's Theory of Intention’, in B. Vermazen and M. Hintikka (eds.), Essays on Davidson: Actions and Events, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 13–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, F.: 1889, The Origin of Our Knowledge of Right and Wrong, translated by R. M. Chisholm and E. H. Schneewind, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1980, Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, W.: 1984, ‘A Causal Theory of Intending’, American Philosophical Quarterly 21, 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, W.: 1986, ‘The Two Senses of Desire’, in Marks (1986), 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, J. L. A.: 1989, ‘The Problem of Comparative Value’, Mind 98, 277–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, J. L. A.: 1990, ‘The Intentional and the Intended’, Erkenntnis 33, 191–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G.: 1976, ‘Practical Reasoning’, Review of Metaphysics 29, 431–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G.: 1986, Change In View, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, A.: 1966, ‘Intention and Purpose’, Journal of Philosophy 63, 642–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, A.: 1968, ‘Intention and Purpose in the Law’, in R. S. Summers (ed.), Essays in Legal Philosophy, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 146–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, S.: 1986, ‘The Principle of Double Effect’, Journal of Value Inquiry 20, 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, J. (ed.): 1986, The Ways of Desire, Precedent Publishing, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A.: 1980, ‘Wanting, Intending, and Knowing What One Is Doing’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39, 334–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T.: 1986, The View from Nowhere, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, A. R.: 1985, Grounds of Liability, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garcia, J.L.A. On the irreducibility of the will. Synthese 86, 349–360 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485265

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485265

Keywords

Navigation