Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hans Spemann: Cultural factors in the rejection of an engineering stance in embryology

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hans Spemann's use of the concept “double assurance”, drawn from engineering models in cytology, is discussed in his work on lens development and the action of the organizer. His transformation of this concept within his neo-Lamarckian program is demonstrated and connected with the cultural factors which shaped engineering and embryology in Weimar Germany.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bütschli, Otto: 1876, Studien über die ersten Entwicklungsvorgänge der Eizelle, die Zelltheilung und die Conjugation der Infusoren, Winter, Frankfurt, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, E.: 1920, ‘Otto Bütschli, 1848–1920, Die Naturwissenschaften 7, 543–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemming, W.: 1882, ‘Neue Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Zelle’, Archiv für mikroskopische Anatomie 37, 685–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamburger, Viktor: 1969, ‘Hans Spemann and the Organizer Concept’, Experientia 25, 1121–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamburger, Viktor: 1988, The Heritage of Experimental Embryology: Hans Spemann and the Organizer, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, Jonathan: 1987, ‘National Styles in Science: Genetics in Germany and the United States between the Wars’, Isis 78, 390–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herf, Jeffrey: 1984, Reactionary Modernism: Technology, Culture and Politics in Weimar Germany and the Third Reich, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horder, T. J., Witkowski, J. A. and Wylie, C. C. (eds.): 1985, A History of Embryology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarausch, Konrad: 1982, Students, Society, and Politics in Imperial Germany, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, E.: 1878, ‘Ein Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Struktur des Zellkerns’, Centralblatt für Medicinische Wissenschaft XV.

  • Maienschein, Jane: 1981, ‘Shifting Assumptions in American Biology: Embryology, 1890–1910’, Isis 14, 89–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangold, Otto: 1953, Hans Spemann, Wissenschaftlishes Verlag, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Edward: 1906, Technik und Kultur, Hüpeden & Merzyn, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, Charles E.: 1980, State, Society, and University in Germany, 1700–1914, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minerva: 1906–14, Jahrbuch der Gelehrten Welt, Trubner, Strasburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olby, Robert: 1985, ‘World of Neglected Dimensions’, in Horder et al. (eds.), A History of Embryology, Cambridge University Cambridge, pp. 275–308.

  • Oppenheimer, Jane: 1971, ‘Problems, Concepts, and the History’, in B. Willier et al. (eds.), Analysis of Development, Hafner, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, Philip J.: 1987, Jacques Loeb and the Engineering Ideal in Biology, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhumbler, Ludwig: 1897, ‘Stemmen die Strahlen der Astrosphare oder ziehen sie?’, Roux's Archiv für Entwicklungsmechanik 4, pp. 659–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhumbler, Ludwig: 1898; 1900, ‘Physikalische Analyse von Lebenserscheinungen der Zelle’, Roux's Archiv für Entwicklungsmechanik 7, pp. 103–350; 9, 32–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhumbler, Ludwig: 1909, ‘Radiolarien-Studien (mit Lichtbildern) (Diskussion)’, Verhandlungen der deutschen zoologischen Gesellschaft o.B. 18, pp. 254–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhumbler, Ludwig: 1910, ‘Über eine zweckmässige Weitbildung der Lineschen binären Nomenklatur’, Zoologoscher Anzeiger 36, pp. 453–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhumbler, Ludwig: 1918, ‘Vorschlag zu einer Zweckmässige Formeldarstellung der Biologien von Insekten’, Zeitschrift für angewendte Etomologie 4, 335–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhumbler, Ludwig: 1920, ‘Otto Bütschli's Wabentheorie’, Die Naturwissenschaften 7, 549–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhumbler, Ludwig: 1922, ‘Der Muendener Binokelfuss, eine Vorrichtung zu Binokelbeobachtungen an stehenden Stamme’, Zeitschrift für angewandte Entomologie 8, 403–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinard, Ruth: 1988, ‘Neo-Lamarckism and Technique: Hans Spemann and the Development of Experimental Embryology’, Journal of the History of Biology 21, 95–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spemann, Hans: 1924, ‘Über Organistoren in der tierischen Entwicklung’, Die Naturwissenschaften 12, 599–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spemann, Hans: 1940–41, ‘Die Wissenschaft im Dienste der Nation’, Berichte der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft zu Freiburg i. Br. 37, 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spemann, Hans: 1943, Forschung und Leben, Engelhorn, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spemann, Hans: 1967, Embryonic Development and Induction, Haefner, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. B.: 1896, The Cell in Development and Heredity, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 208 Amherst Rd., 01002, Pelham, MA, USA

    R. G. Rinard

Authors
  1. R. G. Rinard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rinard, R.G. Hans Spemann: Cultural factors in the rejection of an engineering stance in embryology. Synthese 91, 73–91 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484970

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484970

Keywords

Search

Navigation