Abstract
This article examines how feature additions and removals affect consumers' preferences and the attributions they make regarding why these changes occurred. In two experiments, using a range of hypothetical and real products, we find that consumers' preferences for current product formulations are influenced by prior formulations and that changes in consumer preference are more extreme for feature removals than for feature additions. We further find that consumers attribute feature additions to causes that are more external to the firm and more stable over time than those for feature removals. Consumers' product evaluations are more negative when the cause of a feature removal is attributed more internally to the firm. However, consumers' product evaluations are not significantly affected by their attributions for feature additions. Finally, the degree to which the changing feature is linked to a brands' equity moderates these findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ali, Adbul. (1994). “Pioneering Versus Incremental Review and Research Propositions.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 11, 46–61.
Cochran, William G., and Gertrude M.Cox. (1957). Experimental Designs. New York: Wiley.
Folkes, Valerie S. (1988). “Recent Attribution Research in Consumer Behavior: A Review and New Directions.” Journal of Consumer Research 14, 548–565.
Gaski, John F., and Michael J.Etzel. (1986). “The Index of Consumer Sentiment Toward Marketing.” Journal of Marketing 50, 71–81.
Gelb, Betsy D., and Gabriel M. Gelb. (1986). “New Coke's Fizzle: Lessons for the Rest of Us.” Sloan Management (Fall), 71–76.
Hardie, Bruce G. S., Eric J.Johnson, and Peter S.Fader. (1993). “Modelling Loss Aversion and Reference Dependence Effects on Brand Choice.” Marketing Science 12, 378–394.
Hastie, Reid. (1984). “Causes and Effects of Causal Attribution.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46, 44–56.
Rajendran, K. N., and Gerald J.Tellis. (1994). “Contextual and Temporal Components of Reference Price.” Journal of Marketing 58, 22–34.
Reis, Al. (1994). “Marketers, Stop Your Tinkering.” New York Times, June 19, F11.
Swasy, Alecia. (1990). “How Innovations at P&G Restored Luster to Washed Up Pert and Made It Number 1.” Wall Street Journal, December 6, B1, B6.
Tversky, Amos, and DanielKahneman. (1991). “Loss Aversion and Riskless Choice: A Reference Dependent Model.“ Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 1039–1061.
Weiner, Bernard. (1986). An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag
Yi, Youjae. (1991). “A Critical Review of Consumer Satisfaction.” In Valarie A.Zeithmal (Ed.), Review of Marketing 1989, Chicago: American Marketing Association.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sen, S., Morwitz, V.G. Is it better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all? The effect of changes in product features over time. Market Lett 7, 225–235 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435739
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435739