Skip to main content
Log in

Determinism and locality in quantum systems

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Models of the EPR-Bohm experiment usually consider just two times, an initial time, and the time of measurement. Within such analyses, it has been argued that ‘locality’ is equivalent to determinism, given the strict correlations of quantum mechanics. However, an analysis based on such models is only a preliminary to an analysis based on a complete dynamical model. The latter analysis is carried out, and it is shown that, given certain definitions of ‘locality’ and ‘determinism’ for completely dynamical models, locality implies, but is not implied by, determinism. Further, it is suggested that a local deterministic model has not been ruled out by Bell's theorem. It is suggested that such a model could naturally deny the independence of initial complete states from the settings of the apparatuses (a crucial assumption in the derivation of Bell's inequality).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aspect, A., P. Grangier, and G. Roger: 1981, ‘Experimental Tests of Realistic Local Theories via Bell's Theorem’, Physical Review Letters 47, 725–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspect, A., P. Grangier, and G. Roger: 1982a, ‘Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell's Inequalities’, Physical Review Letters 48, 91–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspect, A., J. Dalibard, and G. Roger: 1982b, ‘Experimental Tests of Bell's Inequalities Using Time-Varying Analyzers’, Physical Review Letters 49, 1804–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J.: 1964, ‘On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox’, Physics 1, 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J.: 1987a, ‘Introduction to the Hidden-Variable Question’, in Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J.: 1987b, ‘Quantum Mechanics for Cosmologists’, in Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 117–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D.: 1952, ‘A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden” Variables, I and II’, Physical Review 85, 166–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Born, M.: 1971, The Born-Einstein Letters, Walker, New York, trans. I. Born.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, J.: 1989, ‘A Spacetime Approach to the Bell Inequality’, in J. Cushing and E. McMullin (eds.), Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN, pp. 114–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, J.: 1992, ‘Bell's Theorem: What it Takes’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43, 41–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, J.: 1995, ‘Vacuum Correlations and Outcome Dependence in Algebraic Quantum Field Theory’, Annals of the New York Acadamy of Sciences, to be published.

  • Clauser, J. and M. Horne: 1974, ‘Experimental Consequences of Objective Local Theories’, Physical Review D 10, 526–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clauser, J. and A. Shimony: 1978, ‘Bell's Theorem: Experimental Tests and Implications’, Reports on Progress in Physics 41, 1881–927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, R., M. Redhead, and J. Butterfield: 1991, ‘Generalization of the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger Algebraic Proof of Nonlocality’, Foundations of Physics 21, 149–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushing, J.: 1994, ‘Locality/Separability: Is This Necessarily a Useful Distinction?’, in D. Hull, M. Forbes, and R. Burian (eds.), PSA 1994, vol. I, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI, pp. 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushing, J.: 1994b, Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, M.: 1995, ‘Probability and Non-locality: Determinism Versus Indeterminism in Quantum Mechanics’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Notre Dame.

  • Dickson, M.: (1996) ‘Nonlocality in the Bohm Theory: Troubling or Trifling?’, to be published in J. Cushing, A. Fine, and S. Goldstein (eds.), Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, A.: 1982a, ‘Hidden Variables, Joint Probability, and the Bell Inequalities’, Physical Review Letters 48, 291–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, A.: 1982b, ‘Joint Distributions, Quantum Correlations, and Commuting Observables’, Journal of Mathematical Physics 23, 1306–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, A.: 1982c, ‘Some Local Models for Correlation Experiments’, Synthese 50, 279–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberger, D. M., M. A. Horne, and A. Zeilinger: 1989, ‘Going Beyond Bell's Theorem’, in M. Kafatos (ed.), Bell's Theorem, Quantum Theory, and Conceptions of the Universe. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, pp. 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberger, D. M., M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and A. Zeilinger: 1990, ‘Bell's Theorem Without Inequalities’, American Journal of Physics 58, 1131–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D.: 1985, ‘Einstein on Locality and Separability’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 16, 171–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D.: 1989, ‘Holism, Separability, and the Metaphysical Implications of the Bell Experiments’, in J. Cushing and E. McMullin (eds.), Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN, pp. 224–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett, J.: 1984, ‘On the Physical Significance of the Locality Conditions in the Bell Arguments’, Noûs 18, 569–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett, J.: 1986, ‘Does Bell's Theorem Apply to Theories That Admit Time-Dependent States?’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 480, 428–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T., E. Santos, and F. Selleri: 1983, ‘Local Realism Has Not Been Refuted by Atomic Cascade Experiments’, Physics Letters A 98, 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maudlin, T.: 1994, Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagonis, C., M. L. G. Redhead, and R. K. Clifton: 1991, ‘Breakdown of Quantum Nonlocality in the Classical Limit’, Physics Letters A 155, 441–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peres, A.: 1978, ‘Unperformed Experiments Have No Results’, American Journal of Physics 46, 745–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimony, A.: 1986, ‘Events and Processes in the Quantum World’, in R. Penrose and C. Isham (eds.), Quantum Concepts in Space and Time, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. and M. Zanotti: 1976, ‘On the Determinism of Hidden Variable Theories with Strict Correlation and Conditional Statistical Independence of Observables’, in P. Suppes (ed.), Logic and Probability in Quantum Mechanics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 445–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svetlichny, G., M. Redhead, H. Brown and J. Butterfield: 1988, ‘Do the Bell Inequalities Require the Existence of Joint Probability Distributions?’, Philosophy of Science 55, 387–401.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dickson, W.M. Determinism and locality in quantum systems. Synthese 107, 55–82 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413902

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413902

Keywords

Navigation