Abstract
Duhem has generally been understood to have maintained that the major Greek astronomers were instrumentalists. This view has emerged mainly from a reading of his 1908 publication To Save the Phenomena. In it he sharply contrasted a sophisticated Greek interpretation of astronomical models (for Duhem this was that they were mathematical contrivances) with a naive insistence of the Arabs on their concrete reality. But in Le Système du monde, which began to appear in 1913, Duhem modified his views on Greek astronomy considerably; his more subtle understanding included the recognition that many Greeks subordinated mathematical astronomy to physical theory. But he could not completely repudiate his earlier views about Greek astronomy in part because his extreme nineteenth century prejudices led him to continue to insist on a clear-cut demarcation between Greek and Arabic astronomy. The inevitable result is a certain unevenness in the Système and some glaring inconsistencies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aristotle: 1984, The Complete Works of Aristotle, 2 vols., Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Bernal, M.: 1987, Black Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization, vol. I, The Fabrication of Ancient Greece 1785–1985, Free Association Books, London.
Carra de Vaux: 1893, ‘Les sphères célestes selon Nasīr-Eddīn Attūsī’, in P. Tannery, Recherches sur l'histoire de l'astronomie ancienne, Gauthier-Villars & Fils, Paris.
Duhem, P.: 1908, ‘ΣΩZEIN TA ΦAINOMENA: Essai sur la notion de théorie physique de Platon à Galilée’, Annales de philosophie chrétienne 6 (4e série), 113–39, 277–302, 352–77, 482–514, 561–92. Issued in book form also in 1908 by Hermann, Paris; reprinted 1982 by J. Vrin, Paris. Page references are to the 1908 Hermann publication.
Duhem, P.: 1913–1959, Le Système du monde (10 vols.), Hermann, Paris; vol. 1 = 1913, vol. 2 = 1914.
Duhem, P.: 1969, To Save the Phenomena: An Essay on the Idea of Physical Theory from Plato to Galileo, translation of Duhem (1908) by E. Dland and C. Maschler, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Goldstein, B. R.: 1980, ‘The Status of Models in Ancient and Medieval Astronomy’, Centaurus 24, 132–47.
Halma, N.: 1820, Hypothèse et époques des planètes de C. Ptolémée et Hypotyposes de Proclus Diadochus, Merlin, Paris.
Hartner, W.: 1975, ‘The Islamic Astronomical Background to Nicholas Copernicus’, in O. Gingerich and J. Dobrzycki (eds.), Studia Copernicana XIII (Colloquia Copernicana III), Ossolineum (The Polish Academy of Sciences Press), Wroclaw etc., pp. 7–16.
Heiberg, J. L. (ed.): 1898, 1903, Claudii Ptolemaei opera quae exstant omnia, vol. I, Syntaxis Mathematica (2 vols.), Teubner, Leipzig.
Heiberg, J. L. (ed.): 1907, Claudii Ptolemaei opera quae exstant omnia, vol. II, Opera astronomica minora (2 vols.), Teubner, Leipzig.
Jaki, S.: 1984, Uneasy Genius: The Life and Work of Pierre Duhem, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Kennedy, E. S.: 1966, ‘Late Medieval Planetary Theory’, Isis 57, 365–78.
Lloyd, G. E. R.: 1978, ‘Saving the Appearances’, Classical Quarterly 28, 202–22.
Martin, R. N. D.: 1987, ‘Saving Duhem and Galileo: Duhemian Methodology and the Saving of the Phenomena’, History of Science 25, 301–19.
Neugebauer, O.: 1975, A History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy, 3 vols., Springer-Verlag, New York.
Ragep, F. J.: 1982, Cosmography in the ‘Tadhkira’ of Nasīr al-Dīn al-Tūsī, 2 vols., Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Ragep, F. J.: 1987, ‘The Two Versions of the Tūsī Couple’, in D. A. King and G. Saliba (eds.), From Deferent to Equant: Studies in Honor of E. S. Kennedy (The Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 500), New York, pp. 329–56.
Ragep, F. J.: (forthcoming), Nasīr al-Dīn al Tūsī's ‘Tadhkira’. An Edition, Translation and Commentary, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Renan, E.: 1883, L'islamisme et la science, Calmann Lévy, Paris.
Sabra, A. I.: 1978, ‘An Eleventh-Century Refutation of Ptolemy's Planetary Theory’, in Science and History: Studies in Honor of Edward Rosen (Studia Copernicana XVI) Ossolineum (The Polish Academy of Science Press), Wroclaw etc. 117–31.
Sabra, A. I.: 1984, ‘The Andalusian Revolt Against Ptolemaic Astronomy: Averroes and al-Bitrūī’, in E. Mendelsohn (ed.), Transformation and Tradition in the Sciences, Cambridge University Press, pp. 133–53.
Said, E.: 1978, Orientalism, Pantheon Books, New York.
Toomer, G. (trans.): 1984, Ptolemy's Almagest, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ragep, F.J. Duhem, the Arabs, and the history of cosmology. Synthese 83, 201–214 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413757
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413757