Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conceptual dependency as the language of thought

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Roger Schank's research in AI takes seriously the ideas that understanding natural language involves mapping its expressions into an internal representation scheme and that these internal representations have a syntax appropriate for computational operations. It therefore falls within the computational approach to the study of mind. This paper discusses certain aspects of Schank's approach in order to assess its potential adequacy as a (partial) model of cognition. This version of the Language of Thought hypothesis encounters some of the same difficulties that arise for Fodor's account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dennett, Daniel C. and Douglas R. Hofstadter (eds.): 1981, The Mind's I, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, Fred I.: 1981, Knowledge and the Flow of Information, The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, Hubert L.: 1979, What Computers Can't Do: The Limits of Artificial Intelligence (revised edition), Harper Colophon Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, James H.: 1988a, ‘Signs and Minds: An Introduction to the Theory of Semiotic Systems’, in Aspects of Artificial Intelligence, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 133–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, James H. (ed.): 1988b, Aspects of Artificial Intelligence, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, James H.: 1989, ‘Language and Mentality: Computational, Representational, and Dispositional Conceptions’, Behaviorism 17, 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, Jerry A.: 1975, The Language of Thought, Thomas Y. Crowell Company, Inc, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, Jerry A.: 1981, Representations, The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, Jerry A.: 1987, Psychosemantics, The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugeland, John: 1985, Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea, The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary: 1987, Representation and Reality, The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, Charles J. III: 1975, ‘Conceptual Memory and Inference’, in Roger Schank, Conceptual Information Processing, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, Roger: 1972, ‘Conceptual Dependency: A Theory of Natural Language Understanding’, Cognitive Psychology 3, 552–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, Roger: 1973a, ‘Identification of Conceptualizations Underlying Natural Languages’, in Schank and Colby, Computer Models of Thought and Language, W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, pp. 187–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, Roger C. and Kenneth Mark Colby: 1973b, Computer Models of Thought and Language, W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, Roger: 1975, Conceptual Information Processing, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, Roger and Robert Abelson: 1977, Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, Roger: 1980, ‘Language and Memory’, reprinted in Barbara J. Grosz, Karen Spark Jones, and Bonnie Lynn Webber: 1986, Readings in Natural Language Processing, Morgan Kauffman Publishers, Inc., Los Altos, California, pp. 171–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, Roger C. and Christopher Riesbeck: 1981, Inside Computer Understanding, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, Roger C.: 1982, Dynamic Memory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, Roger C.: 1986, Explanation Patterns, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, John R.: 1980, ‘Minds, Brains, and Programs’, reprinted as Chapter 22 of Dennett and Hofstadter, 1981.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept of Philosophy, University of Michigan, Flint, 48502, Flint, Michigan, U.S.A.

    Charles E. M. Dunlop

Authors
  1. Charles E. M. Dunlop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

An ancestor of this paper was written while I was on sabbatical leave from the University of Michigan, Flint, during which time I held a fellowship in the Computer Science Department of Wright State University. Revisions were made while I held a Visiting Lectureship at the University of Waikato. I am grateful to these three institutions for their support, and to James H. Fetzer, David Hemmendinger, and Edwin Hung for helpful comments on earlier versions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dunlop, C.E.M. Conceptual dependency as the language of thought. Synthese 82, 275–296 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413665

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413665

Keywords

Search

Navigation