Skip to main content
Log in

Machiavellianism revisited

  • Varia
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The field of management has had difficulty embracing the concept of Machiavellianism despite the myriad of studies produced by other fields of social science. It appears that Machiavellianism as a unitary personality construct has limited efficacy in the complex world of organizations. The authors suggest a multidimensional approach to understanding the impact of an individual's threat to organizational functioning. Viewing the construct as discontinuous with two manifestations, predatory and benign, suggestions are made as to the location within organizations where such individuals may be found. A research approach is also suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J. and Nevitt Sanford, K.: 1950, The Authoritarian Personality (W. W. Norton & Co., New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Budner, S.: 1962, ‘Intolerance of Ambiguity as a Personality Variable’, Journal of Personality 30, pp. 29–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caiden, G. E. and Caiden, N. J.: 1977, ‘Administrative Corruption’, Public Adminstiration Review (May/June), pp. 301–309.

  • Chonko, L.: 1982, ‘Are Purchasing Managers Machiavellian?’, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 18 (Winter), pp. 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R. and Geis, F.: 1970, Studies in Machiavellianism (Academic Press, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, M.: 1986, ‘Trapping the Prince: Machiavelli and the Politics of Deception’, American Political Science Review, 80, pp. 777–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earley, P.: 1988, Family of Spies: Inside the John Walker Spy Ring (Bantam Books, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemmill, G. and Heisler, W.: 1972, ‘Machiavellianism as a Factor in Managerial Job Strain, Job Satisfaction, and Upward Mobility’, Academy of Management Journal 15, pp. 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, F.: 1971, ‘Machiavelli’. In Schwoebel, R. (ed.) Renaissance Men and Ideas (St. Martin's Press, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J., Boster, F., and Gerbing, D.: 1982, ‘Machiavellian Beliefs and Personality: Construct Invalidity of othe Machiavellianism Dimension’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41, pp. 1293–1305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackall, R.: 1988, Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. and Boyatzis, R.: 1979, ‘Goal-setting and Self-directed Behavior Change’, In Jelinek, M. (ed.) Career Management for the Individual and the Organization (St. Clair Press, Chicago, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H.: 1983, Power In and Around Organizations (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H.: 1979, The Structure of Organizations: A Synthesis of Research (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C.: 1977, Complex Organizations, 2d. ed. (Random House, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prociuk, T. and Breen, L.: 1976, ‘Machiavellianism and Locus of Control’, Journal of Social Psychology 98, pp. 141–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph, P.: 1973, The Renaissance in Perspective (St. Martin's Press, New York, NY)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M.: 1965, Society and the Adolescent Self-image (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. and Mitchell, T.: 1988, ‘The Problem or Mystery of Evil and Virtue in Organizations’, in Kolenda, K., ed., Organizations and Ethical Individualism (Praeger, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J.: 1973, ‘Machiavellianism, MBAs, and Managers: Leadership Correlates and Socialization Effects’, Academy of Management Journal 16, pp. 404–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D.: 1967, Organizations in Action (McGraw Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Troldhal, V. and Powell, F.: 1965, ‘A Short-Form Dogmatism Scale for Use in Field Studies’, Social Forces 44, pp. 295–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zook, A.: 1985, ‘On Measurement of Machiavellianism’, Psychological Reports 57, p. 982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zook, A. and Sipps, G.: 1985, ‘Reliability Data and Sex Differences with a Gender-free Mach IV’, The Journal of Social Psychology 126, pp. 131–132.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

George Nelson, Assistant Professor of Management at Prarie View A and M University in Texas, has published articles in the Journal of Small Business Management, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, and Business Insights. He has presented papers at SWFAD, International Marketing and Management, and ORSA/TIMS conferences. His research interests include the interface of business and politics, female entrepreneurs, and applied organizational theory.

Diana Gilbertson, Associate Professor of Management at California State University in Fresno, conducts research in nonprofit strategic management, leadership, and women in business. She has presented papers at numerous conferences and has published in the Labor Law Journal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nelson, G., Gilbertson, D. Machiavellianism revisited. J Bus Ethics 10, 633–639 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382884

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382884

Keywords

Navigation