Skip to main content
Log in

Benthic polychaete assemblages and their relationship to the sediment in Port Madison, Washington

  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two indices of community association and a 3 dimensional ordination of stations were used to elucidate the relationship between small-scale changes in species, composition of polychaete assemblages and changes in the physical character of the sediment, at 9 stations along a 1.5 km subtidal transect. There were no faunal or physical discontinuities that might have been used to delineate boundaries of polychaete communities, except at a very shallow station where the effects of extreme fluctuations of temperature and salinity were evident. The degree of similarity between assemblages was related to the similarity of the sediments at the different stations. In particular, the changes in species composition appeared to correspond most clearly to differences in the clay content of the sediment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Banse, K., K. D. Horson and F. H. Nichols: Annotated list of polychaetes, pp 521–556. In: U. Lie: A quantitative study of benthic infauna in Puget Sound, Washington, U.S.A., in 1963–1964. FiskDir. Skr. (Ser. Havunders.) 14, 229–556 (1968).

  • Berkeley, E. and C. Berkeley: Annelida, Polychaeta Errantia. Can. Pacif. Fauna 9b (1), 1–100 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Annelida, Polychaeta Sedentaria. Can. Pacif. Fauna 9b (2), 1–139 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J. R. and J. T. Curtis: An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27, 325–349 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • Creager, J. S., D. A. McManus and E. E. Collias: Electronic data processing in sedimentary size analyses. J. sedim. Petrl. 32, 833–839 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fager, E. W.: Communities of organisms. In: The sea, Vol. 2, pp 415–437. Ed. by M. N. Hill. New York: Interscience Publishers 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith, P.: Quantitative plant ecology, 256 pp. London: Butterworths 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, O.: Polychaetous annelids from California. Allan Hancock Pacif. Exped. 25, 1–226 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, N. S.: Marine bottom communities. Biol. Rev. 25, 283–313 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M. G.: Rank correlation methods. 3rd ed., 199 pp. New York: Hafner Publishing Co. 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumbein, W. C. and F. J. Pettijohn: Manual of sedimentary petrography, 549 pp. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lie, U.: A quantitative study of benthic infauna in Puget Sound, Washington, U.S.A., in 1963–1964. Fisk Dir. Skr. (Ser. Havunders.) 14, 229–556 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Looman, J. and J. B. Campbell: Adaptation of Sørenson's K (1948) for estimating unit affinities in prairie vegetation. Ecology 41, 409–416 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus, D. A.: A criticism of certain usage of the phinotation. J. sedim. Petrol. 33, 670–674 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, R.: The role of detritus in the nutrition of two marine deposit feeders, the prosobranch Hydrobia ulvae and the bivalve Macoma balthica. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 144, 25–45 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, F. H.: A quantitative study of benthic polychaete assemblages in Port Madison, Washington, 78 pp. Seattle: M. S. Thesis, Univ. Washington 1968.

  • Petersen, C. G. J.: Valuation of the sea. 2. The animal communities of the sea-bottom and their importance for marine zoogeography. Rep. Dan. biol. Stn. 21, 1–44 (1913).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, H. L.: Oceanography of Long Island Sound, 1952–1954. 10. The biology of marine bottom communities. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll. 15, 345–414 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Benthic studies in Buzzards Bay. 1. Animal-sediment relationships. Limnol. Oceanogr. 3, 245–258 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G. W.: Statistical methods. 5th ed., 534 pp. Ames: Iowa State Univ. Press 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorson, G.: Bottom communities (sublittoral or shallow shelf). Mem. geol. Soc. Am. 67, 461–534 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ushakov, P. V.: Polychaeta of the far eastern seas of the USSR. [In Russ.]. Opredeliteli po faune SSSR, Akad. nauk SSSR 56, 1–445 (1955). (Transl. from Russian. pp 1–419. Jerusalem: Israel Prog. Sci. Transl. 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H.: Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biol. Rev. 42, 207–264 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by G. L. Voss, Miami

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nichols, F.H. Benthic polychaete assemblages and their relationship to the sediment in Port Madison, Washington. Marine Biology 6, 48–57 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00352607

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00352607

Keywords

Navigation