Abstract
To test the relative usefulness of different methods of chemical analysis for soil nitrogen fractions in the assessment of the fertilizer nitrogen needs of sugar beet, different doses of nitrogen were applied in field experiments laid out during the years 1985–1991. The chemical methods used were N mineral (NO 3− +NH 4+ ) analyses on soil samples taken in late winter, and extraction with 0.01 M CaCl2 from soil samples taken the preceding autumn and in late winter. The results of the chemical methods were evaluated in models using estimated optimum nitrogen fertilization, nitrogen present in beets or beets+leaves at leaf maximum and sugar yield as variables. In addition, parameters such as estimates of possible rooting depth and mineralization capacity of the soil were also included in the model. All models for estimating nitrogen fertilization need showed low R 2 values. The two methods of soil chemical analysis yielded similar R 2 values for nitrogen uptake in plots both with and without nitrogen fertilization. The N mineral method was least useful in predicting sugar yield. Addition of the covariables rooting depth and mineralization capacity appreciably improved the explanatory value of the models with 0.01 M CaCl2, especially when the analytical results of soil samples taken in autumn were used. For the N mineral method the addition of covariates was found to have far less influence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anonymous (1989) Nederlandse suikerindustrie. Uniforme methode voor gewichtsbepaling, monstername en monsteronderzoek van suikerbieten in Nederland (in Dutch). CSM, Diemen
Appel T, Stephens D (1988) Vergleich von Electro-Ultrafiltration (EUF) und Extraktion mit 0.01 molarer CaCl2 Lösung zur Bestimmung des pflanzenverfügbaren Stickstoffs im Boden. Z Pflanzenernähr Bodenkd 151: 127–130
Appel T, Mengel K (1990) Importance of organic nitrogen fractions in sandy soils, obtained by electro-ultrafiltration or CaCl2-extraction, for nitrogen mineralization and nitrogen uptake of rape. Biol Fertil Soils 10: 97–101
Appel T, Mengel K (1992) Nitrogen uptake of cereals grown on sandy soils as related to nitrogen fertilizer application and soil nitrogen fractions obtained by electro-ultrafiltration (EUF) and CaCl2 extraction. Eur J Agron 1: 1–9
Bakker Y, Withagen L, Wijnen G (1981) De nieuwe richtijn voor de stikstofbemesting van suikerbieten (in Dutch). Bedrijfsont-wikkelin 12: 383–385
Beiss U, Feyerabend I (1984) Methoden der Bodenuntersuchung zur Ermittlung des Düngerbedarfs von Zuckerrüben. Zuckerind 109: 832–840
Fox RH, Piekielek WP (1978) Field testing ofseveral nitrogen availability indexes. Soil Sci Soc AM J 42: 747–750
Houba VIG, Novozamsky I, Huibregts AWM, Lee JJ van der (1986) Comparison of soil extraction by 0.01 M CaCl2, by EUF and by some conventional extraction procedures. Plant and Soil 34: 449–456
Houba VJG, Novozamsky I, Uittenbogaard J, Lee JJ van der (1987) Automatic determination of ‘total soluble nitrogen’ in soil extracts. Landwirtsch Forsch 40: 295–302
Livens J (1959) Contribution a I'étude de l'azote minéralisable du sol. Agricultura (Louvain) 7: 27–44
Németh K (1972) Bodenuntersuchung mittels Elektro-Ultrafiltration (EUF) mit mehrfach variierten Spannung. Landwirtsch Forsch Sonderh 27/II: 184–196
Németh K, Wiklicky L (1982) Bestimmung pflanzenverfügbarer Stickstoff-Fraktionen im Boden und Beurteilung des Stickstoff-Düngerbedarfs für die Zuckerrübe mit EUF. Zuckerind 107: 958–962
Smith SJ, Stanford G (1971) Evaluation of a cemical index of soil nitrogen availability. Soil Sci 111: 228–232
Wiklicky L, Németh K (1981) Düngungsoptimierung mittels EUF-Bodenuntersuchung bei der Zuckerrübe. Zuckerind 106: 982–988
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Houba, V.J.G., Huijbregts, A.W.M., Wilting, P. et al. Sugar yield, nitrogen uptake by sugar beet and optimal nitrogen fertilization in relation to nitrogen soil analyses and several additional factors. Biol Fertil Soils 19, 55–59 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336347
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336347