Skip to main content
Log in

Patch selection by red deer in relation to energy and protein intake: a re-evaluation of Langvatn and Hanley's (1993) results

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Langvatn and Hanley (1993) recently reported that patch use by red deer (Cervus elaphus) was more strongly correlated with short term rates of intake of digestible protein than dry matter. Such short term measures overlook effects of gut filling, which may constrain intake by ruminants over longer time scales (i.e., daily rates of gain). We reanalyzed Langvatn and Hanley's data using an energy intake model incorporating such a processing constraint, to determine whether their conclusions are robust. We found that the use of patches by red deer was just as strongly correlated with an estimate of the daily rate of intake of digestible energy as one of digestible protein during four out of seven trials, but slightly lower in three out of seven trials. In all cases, daily intake of digestible energy was a much better predictor of patch preference by red deer than was the intake of dry matter. Our reanalysis suggests that the daily intake of energy was highly correlated with that of protein in these trials, as may often be the case for herbivores feeding on graminoids. Hence the observed pattern of patch use by red deer could simultaneously enhance rates of both protein and energy intake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ammann AP, Cowan RL, Mothershead CL, Baumgardt BR (1973) Dry matter and energy intake in relation to digestibility in white-tailed deer. J Wildl Manage 37:195–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong DG (1964) Evaluation of artificially dried grass as a source of energy for sheep. II. The energy value of cocksfoot, timothy, and two strains of rye-grass at varying stages of maturity. J Agric Sci 62:399–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold GW (1985) Regulation of forage intake. In: Hudson RJ, White RG (eds) Bioenergetics of wild herbivores. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 81–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Belovsky GE (1978) Diet optimization in a generalist herbivore: the moose. Theor Popul Biol 14:105–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Casella G (1983) Leverage and regression through the origin. Am Stat 37:147–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Doucet CM, Fryxell JM (1993) The effect of nutritional quality on forage preference by beavers. Oikos 67: 201–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell JM (1991) Forage quality and aggregation by large herbivores. Am Nat 138:478–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell JM, Vamosi SM, Walton RA, Doucet CM (1994) Retention time and the functional response of beavers. Oikos 71:207–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates C, Hudson RJ (1978) Energy costs of locomotion in wapiti. Acta Theriol 22:365–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross JE, Shipley LA, Hobbs NT, Spalinger DE, Wunder BA (1993) Functional response of herbivores in food-concentrated patches; tests of a mechanistic model. Ecology 74:778–791

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, McCleery RH (1984) Optimization in behavioural ecology. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 91–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Langvatn R, Hanley TA (1993) Feeding-patch choice by red deer in relation to foraging efficiency: an experiment. Oecologia 95:164–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellin TN, Poulton BR, Anderson MJ (1962) Nutritive value of timothy hay as affected by date of harvest. J Anim Sci 21:123–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Mould ED, Robbins CT (1982) Digestive capabilities in elk compared to white tailed deer. J Wildl Manage 46:22–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers RH (1986) Classical and modern regression with applications. Druxbury Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW (1985) How important are partial preferences? Anim Behav 33:667–669

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Soest P (1982) Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. O and B Books, Corvallis

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickstrom ML, Robbins CT, Hanley TA, Spalinger DE, Parish SM (1984) Food intake and foraging energetics of elk and mule deer. J Wildl Manage 28:1285–1301

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmshurst JF, Fryxell JM, Hudson RJ (1995) Forage quality and patch choice by wapiti (Cervus elaphus). Behav Ecol 6:209–217

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John M. Fryxell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilmshurst, J.F., Fryxell, J.M. Patch selection by red deer in relation to energy and protein intake: a re-evaluation of Langvatn and Hanley's (1993) results. Oecologia 104, 297–300 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328364

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328364

Key words

Navigation