Summary
The bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) was examined in 39 normal potent men and in 252 patients with impaired potency of varying aetiology. For BCR evaluation minimum, maximum and mean latencies, the temporal dispersion in ten successive responses, together with minimum and maximum side differences from simultaneous recordings of the left and right bulbocavernosus muscles were determined. Pathological findings were deteced in 125 patients. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) recorded from the scalp after stimulation of the penile dorsal nerves and the terminal branches of the pudendal nerve were investigated in 30 controls and in 246 patients. An abnormal SSEP was found in 63 patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blaivas JG, O'Donnel TF, Gottlieb P, Labib KB (1980) Measurement of bulbocavernosus reflex latency times as a part of comprehensive evaluation of impotence. In: Zorgniotti AW, Rossi G (eds) Vasculogenic impotence. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Corpus Cavernosum Revascularisation. Thomas, Springfield, Ill, pp 49–65
Blaivas JG, Zayed AAH, Labib KB (1981) The bulbocavernosus reflex in urology: a prospective study of 299 patients. J Urol 126:197–199
Bors E, Comarr AE (1960) Neurological disturbances of sexual function with special reference to 529 patients with spinal cord injury. Urol Surv 10:191–222
Bradley WE, Lin JTY, Johnson B (1984) Measurement of the conduction velocity of the dorsal nerve of the penis. J Urol 131:1127–1129
Chantraine A, De Leval J, Onkelinx A (1973) Motor conduction velocity in the internal pudendal nerves. In: Desmedt JE (eds) New developments in electromyography and clinical neurophysiology, vol 2. Karger, Basel, pp 433–438
Dick HC, Bradley WE, Scott FB, Timm GW (1974) Pudendal sexual reflexes, electrophysiological investigations. Urology 3:376–379
Dorfman L (1977) Indirect estimation of the spinal cord conduction velocity in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 42:26–34
Ertekin C, Reel F (1976) Bulbocavernosus reflex in normal men and in patients with neurogenic bladder and/or impotence. J Neurol Sci 28:1–15
Ertekin C, Akyürekli Ö, Nurettin A, Turgut H (1985) The value of somatosensory-evoked potentials and bulbocavernosus reflex in patients with impotence. Acta Neurol Scand 71:48–53
Haldeman S, Bradley WE, Bhatia NN, Johnson BK (1982) Pudendal evoked responses. Arch Neurol 39:280–283
Herbert J (1973) The role of the dorsal nerves of the penis in the sexual behaviour of the male rhesus monkey. Physiol Behav 10:293–300
Herman CW, Weinberg HJ, Brown J (1986) Testing for neurogenic impotence: a challenge. Urology 27:318–321
Krane RJ, Siroky MB (1980) Studies on sacral evoked potentials. J Urol 124:872–876
Larsson K, Södersten P (1973) Mating in male rats after section of the dorsal penile nerve. Physiol Behav 10:567–571
Lastimosa ACB, Bass NH, Stanback K, Norvell EE (1982) Lumbar spinal cord and early cortical evoked potentials after tibial nerve stimulation: effects of stature on normative data. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 54:499–507
Lehman TP, Jacobs JA (1983) Etiology of diabetic impotence. J Urol 129:291–294
Lin JT, Bradley WE (1985) Penile neuropathy in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. J Urol 133:213–215
Mackel R (1979) Segmental and descending control of the external urethral and anal sphincters in the cat. J Physiol (Lond) 294:105–122
Martin WD, Fletcher TF, Bradley WE (1974) Innervation of feline perineal musculature. Anat Rec 180:15–30
Opsomer RJ, Guerit JM, Wese FX, van Caugh PJ (1986) Pudendal cortical somatosensory evoked potentials. J Urol 135:1216–1218
Pedersen E, Klemar B, Schroder HDAA, Torring J (1982) Anal sphincter responses after perianal electrical stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 45:770–773
Pointel JP, Seng G, Couet C, Brichet B, Gehin PH, Drouin P, Debry G (1986) Electrophysiological study during diabetic impotence: a comparison between the bulbocavernosus reflex and the lower limb nerves. In: Virac R, Virac H (eds) Proceedings of the 1st World Meeting on Impotence. Ceri, Paris, pp 225–228
Roppolo JR, Nadelhaft I, De Groat WC (1985) The organization of pudendal motoneurons and primary afferent projections in the spinal cord of the rhesus monkey by horseradish peroxidase. J Comp Neurol 234:475–488
Rushworth G (1967) Diagnostic value of the electromyographic study of reflex activity in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol [Suppl] 25:65–73
Schroder HD (1981) Onuf's nucleus X: a morphological study of a human spinal nucleus. Anat Embryol (Berl) 162:443–453
Semans JH, Langworthy OR (1938) Observations of the neurophysiology of sexual function in the male cat. J Urol 40:836–846
Shahani BT, Young RR (1971) Human flexor reflexes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 34:616–627
Siroky MB, Sax DS, Krane RJ (1979) Sacral signal tracing: electrophysiology of the bulbocavernosus reflex. J Urol 122:661–664
Stöhr M, Dichgans J, Diener C, Buettner WW (1982) Evozierte Potentiale. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Swash M (1982) Early and late components in the human anal reflex. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 45:767–769
Takahashi M (1980) Morphological analysis of the pudendal nerve. Acta Anat Nippon 55:23–44
Tsuji S, Lüders H, Lesser RP, Dinner DS, Klem G (1984) Subcortical and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials by posterior nerve stimulation: normative values. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 59:214–228
Ueyama T, Mizuno N, Takahashi O, Nomura S, Arakawa H, Matsushima R (1985) Central distribution of efferent and afferent components of the pudendal nerve in macaque monkeys. J Comp Neurol 232:548–556
Vodusek DB, Janko M, Lokar J (1983) Direct and indirect responses in perineal muscles on electrical stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 46:67–71
Wabrek AJ (1985) Bulbocavernosus reflex testing in 100 consecutive cases of erectile dysfunction. Urology 25:495–498
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tackmann, W., Porst, H. & van Ahlen, H. Bulbocavernosus reflex latencies and somatosensory evoked potentials after pudendal nerve stimulation in the diagnosis of impotence. J Neurol 235, 219–225 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00314350
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00314350