Skip to main content
Log in

Developmental change in aggregation, defense and escape behavior of buckmoth caterpillars, Hemileuca lucina (Saturniidae)

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Changes in response to attack and the tendency to aggregate were examined in the six larval instars of the buckmoth, Hemileuca lucina (Saturniidae). In response to simulation of attack by a parasitoid and of biting by a predator, early instars (I, II, and III) exhibited defensive behavior much more often than escape behaviors, whereas late instar larvae (IV, V, and VI) usually resorted to escape rather than defend themselves. The situations in which attacked larvae were most likely to stimulate other group members to respond were: second and third instar larvae thrashing in response to simulation of a parasitoid or headrearing in response to simulation of a biting predator; and fourth, fifth and sixth instar larvae dropping in response to either stimulus. An index of reaggregation indicated that first instar larvae had difficulty reaggregating; second, third and fourth instar larvae reaggregated quickly; and fifth and sixth larvae dispersed. As larvae developed, the change from predominantly defense to escape behaviors paralleled the decline in tendency to aggregate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berenbaum MR (1984) Mantids and milkweed bugs: Efficacy of aposematic coloration against invertebrate predators. Am Midl Nat 111:64–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum MS (1981) Arthropod Defenses. Academic Press, New York, p 562

    Google Scholar 

  • Capinera JL (1980) A trail pheromone from silk produced by larvae of the range caterpillar, Hemileuca oliviae (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae), and observations on aggregation behavior. J Chem Ecol 6:655–664

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey TM, Hegel JR (1981) Caterpillar setae: insulation for an ectotherm. Science 214:1131–1133

    Google Scholar 

  • Dethier VG (1959) Food-plant distribution and density and larval dispersal as factors affecting insect populations. Can Entomol 112:731–738

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner T (1971) Chemical defense against predation in arthropods. In: Sondheimer E, Simeone JB (eds) Chemical ecology. Academic Press, New York, pp 157–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson JF, Metcalf RL (1985) Cucurbitacins: plant-derived defensive compounds for diabroticites (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J Chem Ecol 11:311–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald TD (1976) Trail marking by larvae of the eastern tent caterpillar. Science 194:961–963

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald TD (1980) An analysis of daily foraging patterns of laboratory colonies of the eastern tent caterpillar, Malacosoma americanum (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae), recorded photoelectrically. Can Entomol 112:731–738

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghent AW (1960) A study of the group-feeding behavior of larvae of the Jack Pine Sawfly, Neodiprion pratti banksianae Roh. Behaviour 16:110–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1979) Foraging strategies of caterpillars: leaf damage and possible predator avoidance strategies. Oecologia (Berlin) 42:325–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1981) Ecological and evolutionary perspectives. In: Heinrich B (ed) Insect thermoregulation. Wiley, New York, pp 235–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Honda K (1981) Larval osmeterial secretions of the swallowtails (Papilio). J Chem Ecol 7:1089–1113

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwao S, Wellington WG (1970) The influence of behavioral differences among tent-caterpillar larvae on predation by a pentatomid bug. Can J Zool 48:896–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris RF (1963) The effect of predator age and prey defense on the functional response of Podisus maculiventris Say to the density of Hyphantria cunea. Can Entomol 99:24–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausher MD (1979) Egg recognition: its advantage to a butterfly. Anim Behav 27:1034–1040

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz JC (1983) Habitat selection and foraging tactics of caterpillars in heterogeneous trees. In: Denno RF, McClure MS (eds) Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed systems. Academic Press, New York, pp 61–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerra-Carmona A, Barbosa P (1983) Nutrient content of four rosaceous hosts and their effects on development and fecundity of the eastern tent caterpillar, Malacosoma americanum (Fab.) (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). Can J Zool 61:2868–2872

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour RS (1974) Convective and evaporative cooling in sawfly larvae. J Insect Physiol 20:2447–2457

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamp NE (1982) Behavioral interactions of parasitoids and Baltimore checkerspot caterpillars, Euphydryas phaeton. Environ Entomol 11:100–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamp NE (1984a) Interactions of parasitoids and checkerspot caterpillars, Euphydryas spp. (Nymphalidae). J Res Lepid 23:2–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamp NE (1984b) Foraging behavior of tawny emperor caterpillars (Nymphalidae: Asterocampa clyton). J Lepid Soc 38:186–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamp NE (1986) Physical constraints of defense and response to invertebrate predators by pipevine caterpillars (Battus philenor: Papilionidae). J Lepid Soc 40:191–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan CR, Wellington WG (1953) The light reactions of larvae of the tent caterpillars, Malacosoma disstria Hbn., M. americanum (Fab.), and M. pluviale (Dyar) (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). Can Entomol 85:297–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki N, Junimi Y, Uematsu S, Kobayashi K (1980) Changes in spatial distribution pattern during the larval stage of the fall webworm, Hyphantria cunea Drury (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Res Popul Ecol 22:273–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Tostowaryk W (1971) Relationship between parasitism and predation of diprionid sawflies. Ann Entomol Soc Am 64:1424–1427

    Google Scholar 

  • Tostowaryk W (1972) The effect of prey defense of the functional response of Podisus modestus (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) to densities of the sawflies Neodiprion swainei and N. pratti banksianae (Hymenoptera: Neodiprionidae). Can Entomol 104:61–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsubaki Y, Shiotsu Y (1982) Group feeding as a strategy for exploiting food resources in the burnet moth Pryeria sinica. Oecologia (Berlin) 55:12–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis, 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, p 718

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cornell, J.C., Stamp, N.E. & Bowers, M.D. Developmental change in aggregation, defense and escape behavior of buckmoth caterpillars, Hemileuca lucina (Saturniidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20, 383–388 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302980

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302980

Keywords

Navigation