Abstract
Job satisfaction for women workers is traditionally researched from the job-gender model in which sex roles generate the research framework. Women employed in the labor market are viewed as responding primarily to the confines of sex roles, as opposed to the structural rewards and constraints of the labor market itself. We reexamined earlier studies that found no effect of the labor market on job satisfaction for women. Reanalysis of the 1972–1973 Quality of Employment national survey revealed significantly different levels of job satisfaction, which are in part structured by the characteristics of the labor market sectors in which women and men work. Women working in labor market sectors that are predominantly male or have a balanced proportion of male and female workers jobs have high job satisfaction. This job satisfaction is predicted almost exclusively by their perceptions of fewer income problems, flexibility of hours, and use of job skills. Factors related to maternity benefits and leaves are related only marginally to job satisfaction for women workers in either labor market sector. Women in predominantly female sectors of the labor market have similarly high job satisfaction scores, but these are related to a wider cluster of factors, including fewer perceived income problems, skills, and challenge factors, as well as the socioemotional rewards of their work. This pattern is most similar to males who work in predominantly male sectors. In contrast, males who work in predominantly female or gender-proportionate jobs have significantly lower job satisfaction scores, even after controling for income issues and other benefits. Labor market sectors and the rewards available within them are important structural dimensions of job satisfaction for women and men employees.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrisani, P. J. Job satisfaction among working women. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1978, 3, 588–607.
Bielby, D. D., & Bielby, W. Work commitment and sex-role attitudes. American Sociological Review, 1984, 49, 234–247.
Blau, F. Equal pay in the office. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath, 1977.
Blau, F., & Jusenius, C. L. Economists' approaches to sex segregation of the labor market: An appraisal. In: Blaxall & Reagan (Eds.), Women and the workplace. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.
Bonacich, E. J. A theory of ethnic antagonism: Split labor market theory. American Sociological Review, 1973, 37, 547–559.
Doeringer, P., & Piore, M. Internal labor markets and manpower analysis. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1971.
Duncan, O. D. A socioeconomic index for all occupations. In A. J. Reiss (Ed.), Occupations and social status. New York: Free Press, 1971.
England, P. Women and occupational prestige: A case of vacuous sex equality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1979, 5, 252–265.
Feldberg, R. L., & Glenn, E. N. Male and female: Job versus gender models in the sociology of work. In R. Kahn-Hut, A. K. Daniels, & E. Clovard (Eds.), Women and work. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.
Gold, D. B. Women and voluntarism. In Gornick & Moran (Eds.), Woman in sexist society. New York: Mentor Books, 1971.
Kanter, R. M. Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books, 1977.
Kanter, R. M. The impact of hierarchical structures on work behavior of women and men. In R. Kahn-Hut, A. K. Daniels, & E. Clovards (Eds.), Women and work. Cambridge: Oxford University Press, 1982.
Lloyd, C. B., & Niemi, B. T. The economics of sex differentials. New York: Columbia University Press, 1979.
Nieva, V., & Gutek, B. Women and work: A psychological perspective. New York: Praeger, 1981.
O'Farell, B., & Harlan, S. Craftworkers and clerks: The effect of male co-worker hostility on women's satisfaction with non-traditional jobs. Working paper: Wellesley, MA: Center for Research on Women, Wellesley College, 1980.
O'Leary, V. Some attitudinal barriers to occupational aspirations in women. Psychological Bulletin, 1981, 8, 809–826.
Orpen, C. Effect of flexible working hours on employee satisfaction and performance: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1981, 6, 113–116.
Pines, A., & Kafry, D. Tedium in the life and work of professional women as compared with men. Sex Roles, 1981, 7, 963–977.
Quinn, R., & Shepard, L. The 1972–73 Quality of Employment Survey. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center of the Institute for Social Research, 1973.
Seashore, S., & Taber, T. Job satisfaction indicators and their correlates. Paper presented at the Conferences on the Quality of Employment Indicators, Silver Springs, MD, 1974.
Stromberg, A., & Harkess, S. Women working. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Press, 1978.
Treiman, D., & Hartman, H. Women, work and wages. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1981.
U.S. Commission on Civil Rightts. Social indicators of equality for minorities and women. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978.
Walshok, M. G., & Walshok, M. G. The personal and social benefits of paid employment for urban women in skilled and semiskilled occupations. Paper presented at the Ninth World Congress of Sociology, Uppsala, Sweden, 1980.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
A portion of this work was supported by a research grant from the Andrew Mellon Foundation, Henry A. Murray Research Center, Radcliffe College. Alan Booth and Lynn White provided valuable comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moore, H.A. Job satisfaction and women's spheres of work. Sex Roles 13, 663–678 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287302
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287302