Summary
A comparison was made between different microscopic techniques in order to determine which is the best method for recognizing the fragile sites on X chromosomes. Orceinstained mitoses observed in phase contrast showed the highest percentage of fragile X chromosomes. Similar results were obtained by reflection contrast microscopy of mitoses stained briefly with Giemsa solution. Nomarski interference contrast was less suitable and brightfield microscopy was the least suitable technique of those tested.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Patzelt WJ (1977) Reflexionskontrast — eine neue lichtmikroskopische Technik. Mikrokosmos: 78–81
Schwarzacher HG (1974) Preparation of metaphase chromosomes. In: Schwarzacher HG, Wolf U (eds) Methods of human cytogenetics. Springer, Berlin, pp 71–81
Sutherland GR (1979) Heritable fragile sites on human chromosomes. I. Factors affecting expression in lymphocyte culture. Am J Hum Genet 31:125–135
Turner G, Opitz JM (1980) X-linked mental retardation. Am J Med Genet 7:407–415
Turner G, Daniel A, Frost M (1980) X-linked mental retardation, macro-orchidism and the Xq27 fragile site. J Pediatr 96:837–841
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zankl, H., Eberle, G. Methods of increasing the visibility of fragile X chromosomes. Hum Genet 60, 80–81 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00281271
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00281271