Skip to main content
Log in

Does duration of political control matter? Interstate differences in branch-banking laws

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

This study began by trying to explain differences in state branch-banking regulations. Introducing a variable that captures the effect of political dominance over time improves upon the commonly used measures of political dominance at a specific point in time. Even the direct comparison with the previously used percentage point-in-time variables shows that duration of political influence matters significantly. No matter which party is in control, the length of time it has been in control in a state influences political outcomes. We show that, in terms of which kind of legislation will be enacted, Democratic and Republican control exert equal but opposite effects on legislative results. In other words, length of control matters independently of party affiliation, but party affiliation affects the nature of the outcome of the political process.

This new approach might be useful in different areas of the public choice literature. For example, it could be applied to analyzing how abortion laws vary across states. Other areas of economics might benefit as well from considering the duration of control. For example, the political business cycle literature, as in Alesina and Sachs (1988), Golden and Poterba (1980), Hibbs (1977) and Hawthorne and Jackson (1987), that examines patterns in macroeconomic policies and outcomes associated with the kind of government in power, might well be improved by including duration as well as direction of control. In general, any area of public economics in which the effects of political power are considered would benefit from considering the duration as well as the incidence of that power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina, A. and Sachs, J. (1988). Political parties and the business cycle in the United States, 1948–1984. Journal of Money Credit and Banking (February): 63–82.

  • Amel, D.F. and Jacowski, M.J. (1989). Trends in banking structure since the mid-1970s. Federal Reserve Bulletin (March): 120–133.

  • Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, B.L. and Engen, E.M. (1988). The market for laws: An economic analysis of legislation. Southern Economic Journal (January): 732–745.

  • Benston, G.J., Hanweck, G.A. and Humphrey, D.B. (1982). Scale economies in banking. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking (November): 435–456.

  • Broder, J.M. and Herren, R.H. (1989). Public regulatory commission influence on electric rates. Unpublished paper. University of Georgia.

  • Coughlin, C.C. (1985). Domestic content legislation: House voting and the economic theory of regulation. Economic Inquiry (July): 437–448.

  • Crain, W.M., Leavens, D.R. and Tollison, R.D. (1986). Final voting in legislatures. American Economic Review (September): 833–841.

  • Crain, W.M., Shughart, W.F. II and Tollison, R.D. (1988). Legislative majorities as nonsalvageable assets. Southern Economic Journal (October): 303–314.

  • Danielsen, A.L. and Rubin, P.H. (1977). An empirical investigation of voting on energy issues. Public Choice (Fall): 121–128.

  • Golden, D.G. and Poterba, J.M. (1980). The price of popularity: The political business cycle reexamined. American Journal of Political Science (November): 698–714.

  • Hawthorne, M.R. and Jackson, J.E. (1987). The individual political economy of federal tax policy. American Political Science Review (September): 757–774.

  • Hibbs, D.A. Jr. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review (December): 1467–1487.

  • Kalt, J.P. and Zupan, M.A. (1984). Capture and ideology in the economic theory of politics. American Economic Review (June): 279–300.

  • Kau, J.B. and Rubin, P.H. (1978). Voting on minimum wages: A time series analysis. Journal of Political Economy (April): 337–342.

  • Kidwell, D.S. and Peterson, R.L. (1987). Financial institutions, markets, and money. Chicago: The Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, D.T. (1980). Branch banking: The competitive issues. Journal of Bank Research (Summer): 110–121.

  • Smith, J.K. (1982). Production of licensing legislation: An economic analysis of interstate differences. Journal of Legal Studies (January): 117–137.

  • Stigler, G.J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science: 3–21.

  • Stigler, G.J. (1972). Economic competition and political competition. Public Choice (Fall): 91–106.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors thank Daniel Hamermesh for his helpful comments on an earlier draft. Data and definitions of the variables are available on disk from the authors upon request.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klier, T., McPherson, M. Does duration of political control matter? Interstate differences in branch-banking laws. Public Choice 70, 41–50 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00239343

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00239343

Keywords

Navigation