Abstract
A case of lipomeningioma, an uncommon variant of meningioma, is described. Typical radiological features of meningioma, such as broad implantation in the dura, strong contrast enhancement and dural tail were associated with characteristics pointing to fatty content: negative density (−80 HU) on CT as well as short T1 and T2 on MRI.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
LeRoux P, Hope A, Lofton S, Harris AB (1989) Lipomatous meningioma: an uncommon tumor with distinct radiographic findings. Surg Neurol 32: 360
Salibi SS, Nauta HJW, Brem H, Epstein JI, Cho KR (1989) Lipomeningioma: report of three cases and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 25: 122
Kepes JJ (1982) Meningiomas biology, pathology and differential diagnosis. Masson, New York, pp 75–109
Russell DS, Rubinstein LJ (1989) Pathology of tumors of the nervous system, 5th edn. Edward Arnold, London, p 470
Russell EJ, George AE, Kricheff II, Budzilovich G (1980) Atypical computed tomographic features of intracranial meningioma: radiological-pathological correlation in a series of 131 consecutive cases. Radiology 135: 673
Lattes R, Bigotti G (1991) Lipoblastic meningioma: “vacuolated meningioma.” Hum Pathol 22: 164
Tans JT, deJongh IE (1977) Computed tomography of supratentorial meningioma. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 80: 10
Kusantikul V, Brown WJ (1984) Lipomatous meningioma associated with cerebral vascular malformation. J Surg Oncol 26: 35
Sacher M, Lonzieri CF, Huong YP, Song SK, Davis RP (1985) Meningioma with intratumoral fat. J Comput Assist Tomogr 9: 83
Christensen WN, Long DM, Epstein JI (1986) Cerebellopontine angle lipoma. Hum Pathol 17: 739
Spencer G, Lufkin R, Simons K, Straatsma B, Foos R, Hanafee W (1987) MR of a melanoma simulating ocular neoplasm. AJNR 8: 921
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Correspondence to: G. Wilms
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brys, P., Lammens, M., Goffin, J. et al. CT and MRI of lipomeningioma: case report and review of the literature. Eur. Radiol. 4, 569–571 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226832
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226832