Abstract
Forest gap models share a common structure for simulating tree population dynamics, and many models contain the same or quite similar ecological factors. However, a wide variety of formulations are being used to implement this general structure. The comparison of models incorporating different formulations is important for model validation, for assessing the reliability of model projections obtained under scenarios of climatic change, and for the development of models with a wide range of applicability. This paper reviews qualitative and quantitative comparisons of the structure and behaviour of forest gap models.
As examples of qualitative model comparisons, the different formulations used for the heightdiameter relationship, for the maximum growth equation, and for the effects of temperature and drought on tree growth are reviewed. The variety of formulations currently in use has the potential to influence simulation results considerably, but we conclude that little is known on the sensitivity of the models in this respect.
The quantitative model comparisons performed so far allow us to draw the following conclusions: (1) Gap models are quite sensitive to the formulation of climate-dependent processes under current climate, and this sensitivity is even more pronounced under a changed climate. (2) Adaptations of forest gap models to specific regions have required detailed sub-models of species life history, thus complicating model comparison. (3) Some of the complex models developed for region-specific applications can be simplified without hampering the realism with which they simulate species composition. (4) Attempts to apply the models without modification beyond the area for which they were developed have produced controversial results.
It is concluded that the sensitivity of forest gap models to the exact process formulations should be examined carefully, and that more systematic comparisons of model behaviour at a range of test sites would be desirable. Such studies could improve our understanding of forest dynamics considerably, and they would help to focus future research activities with gap models.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bassett, J. R.: 1964, ‘Tree Growth as Affected by Soil Moisture Availability’, Soil Sci. Proc. 28, 436–438.
Bonan, G. B.: 1993, ‘Do Biophysics and Physiology Matter in Ecosystem Models?’, Clim. Change 24, 281–285.
Bonan, G. B. and Sirois, L.: 1992, ‘Air Temperature, Tree Growth, and the Northern and Southern Range Limits to Picea mariana’, J. Veg. Sci. 3, 495–506.
Botkin, D. B.: 1993, Forest Dynamics: An Ecological Model, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 309 pp.
Botkin, D. B., Janak, J. R, and Wallis, J. R.: 1970, A Simulator for Northeastern Forest Growth, Research Report 3140, IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY.
Botkin, D. B., Janak, J. F., and Wallis, J. R.: 1972a, ‘Some Ecological Consequences of a Computer Model of Forest Growth’, J. Ecol. 60, 849–872.
Botkin, D. B., Janak, J. F., and Wallis, J. R.: 1972b, ‘Rationale, Limitations and Assumptions of a Northeastern Forest Growth Simulator’, IBM J. Res. Develop. 16, 101–116.
Bugmann, H.: 1994, On the Ecology of Mountainous Forests in a Changing Climate: A Simulation Study, Ph.D. Thesis No. 10638, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Switzerland, 258 pp.
Bugmann, H. K. I.: 1996, ‘A Simplified Forest Model to Study Species Composition Along Climate Gradients’, Ecology 77 (7), in press.
Bugmann, H. and Martin, Ph.: 1995, ‘How Physics and Biology Matter in Forest Gap Models’, Clim. Change 29, 251–257.
Bugmann, H. and Fischlin, A.: 1996, ‘Simulating Forest Dynamics in a Complex Topography Using Gridded Climatic Data’, Clim. Change 34, 201–211 (this issue).
Bugmann, H. and Solomon, A. M.: 1995, ‘The Use of a European Forest Model in North America: A Study of Ecosystem Response to Climate Gradients’, J. Biogeogr. 22, 477–484.
Burger, H.: 1950, ‘Holz, Blattmenge und Zuwachs, X. Die Buche’, Mitt. Schweiz. Anst. forstl. Versuchswes. 26, 419–468.
Coffin, D. P. and Lauenroth, W. K.: 1990, ‘A Gap Dynamics Simulation Model of Succession in a Semiarid Grassland’, Ecol. Modelling 49, 229–236.
Coffin, D. P. and Urban, D. L.: 1993, ‘Implications of Natural History Traits to System-Level Dynamics: Comparisons of a Grassland and a Forest’, Ecol. Modelling 67, 147–178.
Cumming, S. G. and Burton, P. J.: 1996, ‘Phenology-Mediated Effects of Climatic Change on Some Simulated British Columbia Forests’, Clim. Change 34, 213–222 (this issue).
Desanker, P. V.: 1994, ‘Generation of Appropriate Weather Inputs and Issues of Scale in Implementation of Climate Change Scenarios in Ecological Models’, in Proc. IUFRO Workshop on Interscale Relationships within Forest-Atmosphere Processes, August 25–26: 1994, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada.
Desanker, P. V.: 1996, ‘Development of a Miombo Woodland Dynamics Model in Zambezian Africa Using Malawi as a Case Study’, Clim. Change 34, 279–288 (this issue).
Desanker, P. V. and Prentice, I. C.: 1994, ‘MIOMBO - a Vegetation Dynamics Model for the Miombo Woodlands of Zambezian Africa’, For. Ecol. Manage. 69, 87–96.
Ellenberg, H.: 1986, Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer Sicht, 4th edn., Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, 989 pp.
Fischlin, A., Bugmann, H., and Gyalistras, D.: 1995, ‘Sensitivity of a Forest Ecosystem Model to Climate Parametrization Schemes’, Environ. Pollut. 87, 267–282.
Fulton, M.: 1991a, ‘A Computationally Efficient Forest Succession Model: Design and Initial Tests’, For. Ecol. Manage. 42, 23–34.
Fulton, M. R.: 1991b, ‘Simulation Modeling of the Effects of Site Conditions and Disturbance History on a Boreal Forest Landscape’, J. Veg. Sci. 2, 603–612.
Fulton, M. R.: 1993, ‘Rapid Simulations of Vegetation Stand Dynamics with Mixed Life-Forms’, in A. M. Solomon and H. H. Shugart (eds.), Vegetation Dynamics and Global Change, Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 251–271.
Houghton, J. T., Jenkins, G. J., and Ephraums, J. J. (eds.): 1990, Climate Change - the IPCC Scientific Assessment, Report prepared for IPCC by Working Group 1, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 365 pp.
Huang, S., Titus, S. J., and Wiens, D. P.: 1992, ‘Comparison of Nonlinear Height-Diameter Functions for Major Alberta Tree Species’, Can. J. For. Res. 22, 1297–1304.
Huston, M., DeAngelis, D., and Post, W.: 1988, ‘New Computer Models Unify Ecological Theory’, Bioscience 38, 682–691.
Ker, J. W. and Smith, J. H. G.: 1955, ‘Advantages of the Parabolic Expression of Height-Diameter Relationships’, For. Chron. 31, 235–246.
Kienast, F.: 1987, FORECE - A Forest Succession Model for Southern Central Europe, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, ORNL/TM-10575, 69 pp.
Kimmins, J. P.: 1987, Forest Ecology, Macmillan, New York, 531 pp.
Kimmins, J. P. and Lavender, D. P.: 1992, ‘Ecosystem-Level Changes That May Be Expected in a Changing Global Climate: a British Columbia Perspective’, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 11, 1061–1068.
Kinerson, R. S.: 1975, ‘Relationship Between Plant Surface Area and Respiration in Loblolly Pine’, J. Appl. Ecol. 12, 965–971.
Korzukhin, M. D. and Antonovski, M. Ya.: 1992, ‘Population-Level Models of Forest Dynamics’, in H. H. Shugart, R. Leemans, and G. B. Bonan (eds.), A Systems Analysis of the Global Boreal Forest, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 334–372.
Lasch, P. and Lindner, M.: 1995, ‘Application of Two Forest Succession Models at Sites in Northeast Germany’, J. Biogeogr. 22, 485–492.
Leemans, R.: 1992, ‘The Biological Component of the Simulation Model for Boreal Forest Dynamics’, in H. H. Shugart, R. Leemans, and G. B. Bonan (eds.), A Systems Analysis of the Global Boreal Forest, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 428–445.
Leemans, R. and Cramer, W.: 1991, The IIASA Climate Database for Land Area on a Grid of 0.5° Resolution, WP-41, International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
Leemans, R. and Prentice, I. C.: 1989, FORSKA, a General Forest Succession Model, Institute of Ecological Botany, Uppsala, 70 pp.
Lotter, A. and Kienast, F: 1992, ‘Validation of a Forest Succession Model by Means of Annually Laminated Sediments’, in M. Saarnisto and A. Kahra (eds.), Proc. INQUA Workshop on Laminated Sediments, June 4–6, 1990, Lammi, Finland, Geol. Survey of Finland, Special paper series 14, 25–31.
Martin, Ph.: 1990, Forest Succession and Climate Change: Coupling Land-Surface Processes and Ecological Dynamics, Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of California at Berkeley and National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO.
Martin, Ph.: 1992, ‘EXE: A Climatically Sensitive Model to Study Climate Change and CO2 Enrichment Effects on Forests’, Austr. J. Bot. 40, 717–735.
Martin, Ph.: 1996, ‘Physics or Stamp-Collecting? Thoughts on Ecosystem Model Design’, Sci. Total Environ., in press.
Moore, A. D.: 1989, ‘On the Maximum Growth Equation Used in Forest Gap Simulation Models’, Ecol. Modelling 45, 63–67.
Pastor, J. and Post, W. M.: 1985, Development of a Linked Forest Productivity-Soil Process Model, U.S. Dept. of Energy, ORNL/TM-9519.
Pojar, J., Klinka, K., and Meidinger, D. V.: 1987, ‘Biogeoclimatic Ecosystem Classification in British Columbia’, For. Ecol. Manage. 22, 119–154.
Post, W. M. and Pastor, J.: 1996, ‘Linkages - An Individual-Based Forest Ecosystem Model’, Clim. Change 34, 253–261 (this issue).
Prentice, I. C. and Helmisaari, H.: 1991, ‘Silvics of North European Trees: Compilation, Comparisons and Implications for Forest Succession Modelling’, For. Ecol. Manage. 42, 79–93.
Prentice, I. C., Sykes, M. T., and Cramer, W.: 1993, ‘A Simulation Model for the Transient Effects of Climate Change on Forest Landscapes’, Ecol. Modelling 65, 51–70.
Reed, K. L.: 1980, ‘An Ecological Approach to Modeling Growth of Forest Trees’, For. Sci. 26, 33–50.
Shinozaki, K., Yoda, K., Hozumi, K., and Kira, T.: 1964, ‘A Quantitative Analysis of Plant Form - The Pipe Model Theory, I. Basic Analyses’, Jap. J. Ecol. 14, 97–105.
Shugart, H. H.: 1984, A Theory of Forest Dynamics, The Ecological Implications of Forest Succession Models, Springer, New York, 278 pp.
Shugart, H. H. and West, D. C.: 1977, ‘Development of an Appalachian Deciduous Forest Succession Model and its Application to Assessment of the Impact of the Chestnut Blight’, J. Environ. Manage. 5, 161–179.
Sirois, L., Bonan, G. B., and Shugart, H. H.: 1994, ‘Development of a Simulation Model of the Forest-Tundra Transition Zone of Northeastern Canada’, Can. J. For. Res. 24, 697–706.
Solomon, A. M.: 1986, ‘Transient Response of Forests to CO2-Induced Climate Change: Simulation Modeling Experiments in Eastern North America’, Oecologia 68, 567–579.
Solomon, A. M. and Tharp, M. L.: 1985, ‘Simulation Experiments with Late Quaternary Carbon Storage in Mid-Latitude Forest Communities’, in E. T. Sundquist and W. S. Broecker (eds.), The Carbon Cycle and Atmospheric CO 2 : Natural Variations Archean to Present, American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, Geophysical Monograph, Vol. 32, pp. 235–250.
Solomon, A. M. and Bartlein, P. J.: 1992, ‘Past and Future Climate Change: Response by Mixed Deciduous-Coniferous Forest Ecosystems in Northern Michigan’, Can. J. For. Res. 22, 1727–1738.
Solomon, A. M., West, D. C., and Solomon, J. A.: 1981, ‘Simulating the Role of Climate Change and Species Immigration in Forest Succession’, in D. C. West, H. H. Shugart, and D. B. Botkin (eds.), Forest Succession: Concepts and Application, Springer, New York, pp. 154–177.
Solomon, A. M., Delcourt, H. R., West, D. C., and Blasing, T. J.: 1980, ‘Testing a Simulation Model for Reconstruction of Prehistoric Forest-Stand Dynamics’, Quat. Res. 14, 275–293.
Steffen, W. L., Walker, B. H., Ingram, J. S., and Koch, G. W. (eds.): 1992, Global Change and Terrestrial Ecosystems: The Operational Plan, IGBP Report No. 21, Stockholm, 95 pp.
Sykes, M. T. and Prentice, I. C.: 1996, ‘Climate Change, Tree Species Distributions and Forest Dynamics: A Case Study in the Mixed Conifer/Northern Hardwoods Zone of Northern Europe’, Clim. Change 34, 161–177 (this issue).
Sykes, M. T., Prentice, I. C., and Cramer, W.: 1996, ‘A Bioclimatic Model for the Potential Distribution of North European Tree Species Under Present and Future Climates’, J. Biogeogr., in press.
Thornthwaite, C. W. and Mather, J. R.: 1957, ‘Instructions and Tables for Computing Potential Evapotranspiration and the Water Balance’, Publ. Climatol. 10, 183–311.
Urban, D. L.: 1990, A Versatile Model to Simulate Forest Pattern: A User's Guide to Zelig 1.0, Univ. of Virginia, Dept. of Environmental Sciences, Charlottesville, VA, 108 pp.
von Bertalanffy, L.: 1957, ‘Quantitative Laws is Metabolism and Growth’, Quat. Rev. Biol. 32, 217–231.
Watt, A. S.: 1947, ‘Pattern and Process in the Plant Community’, J. Ecol. 35, 1–22.
Whittaker, R. H. and Marks, P. L.: 1975, ‘Methods of Assessing Terrestrial Productivity’, in H. Lieth and R. H. Whittaker (eds.), Primary Productivity of the Biosphere, Ecological Studies, Springer, Berlin, 14, 55–118.
Xiaodong Yan and Shidong Zhao: 1995, ‘Simulating the Carbon Storage Dynamics of Temperate Broadleaved Coniferous Mixed Forest Ecosystems: I. Dynamics of the Tree Layer of Broadleaved Korean Pine Forests in the Changbai Mountains’, Chin. J. Ecol. 14, 6–12 [in Chinese].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bugmann, H.K.M., Yan, X., Sykes, M.T. et al. A comparison of forest gap models: Model structure and behaviour. Climatic Change 34, 289–313 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224640
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224640