Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of pollen selection on progeny vigor in a Cucurbita pepo x C. texana hybrid

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined the effects of pollen selection for rapid pollen-tube growth on progeny vigor. First, we crossed a wild gourd (Cucurbita texana) to a cultivated zucchini (Cucurbita pepo cv ‘Black Beauty’) to produce an F1 and then an F2 generation. Half of the F1 seeds were produced by depositing small loads of C. texana pollen onto the stigmas of C. pepo. These small pollen loads were insufficient to produce a full complement of seeds and, consequently, both the fast- and the slow-growing pollen tubes were permitted to achieve fertilization. An F2 generation was then produced by depositing small loads of F1 pollen onto stigmas of F1 plants. The F2 seeds resulting from two generations of small pollen loads are termed the non-selected line because there was little or no selection for pollen-tube growth rate on these plants. The other half of the F1 and F2 seeds were produced by depositing large pollen loads (>10 000 pollen grains) onto stigmas and then allowing only the first 1% or so of the pollen tubes that entered the ovary to fertilize the ovules. We did this by excising the styles at the ovary at 12–15 h after pollination. The resulting F2 seeds are termed ‘the selected line’ because they were produced by two generations of selection for only the fastest growing pollen tubes. Small pollen loads from the F2plants, both the selected and the non-selected lines, were then deposited onto stigmas of different C. pepo flowers, and the vigor of the resulting seeds was compared under greenhouse and field conditions. The results showed that the seeds fertilized by pollen from the selected line had greater vegetative vigor as seedlings and greater flower and fruit production as mature plants than the seeds fertilized by pollen from the non-selected line. This study demonstrates that selection for fast pollen-tube growth (selection on the microgametophyte) leads to a correlated increase in sporophyte (progeny) vigor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bawa KS, Webb CJ (1984) Flower, fruit and seed abortion in tropical forest trees: Implications for evolution of paternal and maternal reproductive patterns. Am J Bot 71:736–751

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertin RI (1990) Effects of pollination intensity in Campsis radicans. Am J Bot 77:178–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner ML (1987) The role of hormones in photosynthate partitioning and seed filling. In: Davies, PJ (ed) Plant hormones and their role in plant growth and development. M. N. Shoff, Minneapolis, MN, pp 474–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper BB (1988) Evidence for selective embryo abortion in Cryptantha flava. Am Nat 132:318–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D (1987) Inbreeding and its evolutionary consequences. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 18:237–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth D (1988) A comment on the evidence for pollen competition in plants and its relationship to progeny fitness. Am Nat 132:298–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1992) The effects of selection in the gametophyte stage on mutational load. Evolution 46:703–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth D, Schemske DW, Sork VK (1987) The evolution of plant reproductive characters, sexual vs. natural selection. In: Stearns SC (ed) The evolution of sex and its consequences. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, pp 317–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1979) Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:2480–2484

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis LE, Stephenson AG, Winsor JA (1987) Pollen competition improves performance and reproductive output of the common zucchini squash under field conditions. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 112:711–716

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker-Walters DS (1990) Evidence for multiple domestication of Cucurbita pepo. In: Bates DM, Robinson RW, Jeffrey C (eds) Biology and utilization of the Cucurbitaceae. Cornell University Press, New York, pp 96–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker DS, Wilson HD (1987) Allozyme variation in Cucurbita pepo complex. C. pepo var. ovifera vs. C. texana. Syst Bot 12:263–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingerett ER (1979) Pollen competition in a species of evening primerose, Oenothera organensis Munz. MSc thesis, Washington State University, Pullman, Wash.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick JL, Godt MJW (1989) Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Brown AHD, Clegg MT, Kahler AL, Weir BS (eds) Plant population genetics, breeding and genetic resources. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass., pp 43–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CM, Mulcahy DL (1978) Male gametophyte in maize: II Pollen vigor in inbred plants. Theor Appl Genet 51:211–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Landi P, Frascaroli E, Speranza A (1986) Pollen characteristics of maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines selected for grain yield. Genet Agric 40:397–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee TD (1984) Patterns of fruit maturation: a gametophytic competition hypothesis. Am Nat 123:427–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee TD (1988) Patterns of fruit and seed production. In: Lovett Doust J, Lovett Doust L (eds) Plant reproductive ecology: patterns and strategies. Oxford University Press, N.Y., pp 179–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee TD, Hartgerinck AP (1986) Pollination intensity, fruit maturation pattern and offspring quality in Cassia fasciculate (Leguminosae). In: Mulcahy DL, Ottaviano EM (eds) Pollen: biology and implications for plant breeding. Elsevier Biomedical Press, New York, pp 417–422

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna M, Mulcahy DL (1983) Ecological aspects of gametophytic competition in Dianthus chinensis. In: Mulcahy DL, Ottaviano EM (eds) Pollen: biology and implications for plant breeding. Elsevier Biomedical Press, New York, pp 443–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy DL (1979) The rise of angiosperms: a genecological factor. Science 206:20–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy DL, Mulcahy GB (1975) The influence of gametophytic competition on sporophytic quality in Dianthus chinensis. Theor Appl Genet 46:277–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy DL, Mulcahy GB, Ottaviano E (1975) Sporophytic expression of gametophytic competition in Petunia hybrida. In: Mulcahy DL (ed) Gamete competition in plants and animals. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 227–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy DL, Mulcahy GB, Ottaviano E (1978) Further evidence that gametophytic selection modifies the genetic quality of the sporophyte. Soc Bot Fr Actual Bot 1–2:57–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura RR (1988) Seed abortion and seed size variation within fruits of Phaseolus vulgaris: pollen donor and resource variation effects. Am J Bot 75:1003–1010

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviano EM, Mulcahy DL (1989) Genetics of angiosperm pollen. Adv Genet 26:1–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviano EM, Sari-Gorla M, Arenari I (1983) Male gametophytic competition in maize: selection and implications with regard to breeding systems. In: Mulcahy DL, Ottaviano EM (eds) Pollen: biology and implications for plant breeding. Elsevier Biomedical Press, New York, pp 367–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviano E, Sari-Gorla M, Villa M (1988) Pollen competitive ability in maize: within population variability and response to selection. Theor Appl Genet 76:601–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Quesada M, Schlichting CD, Winsor JA, Stephenson AG (1991) Effects of genotype on pollen performance in Cucurbita pepo. Sex Plant Reprod 4:208–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Quesada M, Winsor JA, Stephenson AG (1993) Effects of pollen competition on progeny performance in a heterozygous cucurbit. Am Nat 142:694–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramstetter J, Mulcahy DL (1988) Consequences of pollen competition for Aureolaria flava seedlings. Bull Ecol Soc Am Suppl 69:269–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson TE, Stephenson AG (1992) Effects of parentage and size of the pollen load on progeny performance in Campanula americana. Evolution 46:1731–1739

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocha OJ, Stephenson AG (1991) Effects of nonrandom seed abortion on progeny performance in Phaseolus coccineus L. Evolution 45:1198–1208

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1990) SAS user's guide: statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting CD, Small L, Stephenson AG, Winsor JA (1990) Pollen loads and progeny vigor: the next generation. Evolution 44:1358–1372

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow AA (1990) Effects of pollen-load size and number of donors on sporophyte fitness in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). Am Nat 136:742–758

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow AA, Mazer SJ (1988) Gametophytic selection in Raphanus raphanistrum: a test for heritable variation in pollen competitive ability. Evolution 42:1065–1075

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1987) The selection arena hypothesis. In: Stearns SC (ed) The evolution of sex and its consequences. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, pp 337–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AG, Winsor JA, Davis LE (1986) Effects of pollen load size on fruit maturation and sporophyte quality in zucchini. In: Mulcahy DL, Ottaviano EM (eds) Biotechnology and ecology of pollen. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 429–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AG, Devlin B, Horton JB (1988a) The effects of seed number and prior fruit dominance on the pattern of fruit production in Cucurbita pepo (zucchini squash). Ann Bot 62:653–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AG, Winsor JA, Schlichting CD (1988b) Evidence for non-random fertilization in the common zucchini, Cucurbita pepo. In: Cresti M, Gori P, Pacini E (eds) Sexual reproduction in higher plants. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 333–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AG, Winsor JA, Schlichting CD, Davis LE (1988c) Pollen competition, non-random fertilization, and progeny fitness: a reply to Charlesworth. Am Nat 132:303–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AG, Quesada MR, Schlichting CD, Winsor JA (1995) Consequences of variation in pollen load size. In: Hoch PC, Stephenson AG (eds) Experimental and molecular approaches to plant systematics. Monogr Syst Bot 53:233–244

  • Tanksley S, Zamir D, Rick CM (1981) Evidence for the extensive overlap of sporophytic and gametophytic gene expression in Lycopersicon esculentum. Science 213:453–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh NE, Charlesworth, D (1992) Evolutionary interpretations of differences in pollen-tube growth rates. Q Rev Biol 67:19–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM, Price MV, Montalvo AM, Gray RN (1987) Female choice in a perennial herbaceous wildflower. Delphinium nelsonii. Evol Trends Plants 1:29–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoby M, Rice B (1982) Evolution of the seed plants and inclusive fitness of plant tisues. Evolution 36:713–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Willing RP, Mascarenhas JP (1984) Analysis of the complexity and diversity of mRNAs from pollen and shoots of Tradescantia. Plant Physiol 75:865–868

    Google Scholar 

  • Willing RP, Bashe B, Mascarenhas JP (1988) Analysis of quantity and diversity of messenger RNAs from pollen and shoots of Zea mays. Theor Appl Genet 75:751–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Winsor JA, Davis LE, Stephenson AG (1987) The relationship between pollen load and fruit maturation and the effect of pollen load on offspring vigor in Cucurbita pepo. Am Nat 129:643–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Young HJ, Stanton ML (1990) Influence of environmental quality on pollen competitive ability in wild radish. Science 248:1631–1633

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by P. L. Pfahler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quesada, M., Winsor, J.A. & Stephenson, A.G. Effects of pollen selection on progeny vigor in a Cucurbita pepo x C. texana hybrid. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 92, 885–890 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00221902

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00221902

Key words

Navigation