Abstract
Mediaeval logicians inherited from Boethius an account of conditional propositions and the syllogisms which may be constructed using them. In the following paper it is shown that there are considerable difficulties with Boethius' account which arise from his failure to understand the nature of compound propositions and in particular to provide for their negation. Boethius suggests that there are two different conditions which may be imposed for the truth of a conditional proposition but he really gives no adequate account of how such propositions may be obtained. The true greatness of Peter Abaelard as a philosophical logician is revealed in what he is able to do with the material which he found in Boethius. It is shown that he developed a precise theory of conditionals giving an account of how true conditionals may be obtained and principles which may be used to reject others as false. Unlike Boethius Abaelard properly appreciates that conjunctions must be treated as logical units. Even he, however, falls victim to difficulties which arise when this connective is brought into contact with negation and the conditions which he lays down for the truth of a conditional.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boethius, A. M. S.: 1880, Commentarii in librum Aristotelis Peri Hermenias pars posterior, ed. C. Meiser, Teubner, Leipzig.
Boethius, A. M. S.: 1891, Manlii Severini Boetii Opera Omnia, Patrologiae Latinae, ed. J. P. Migne, Vol. LXIV, Paris.
Boethius, A. M. S.: 1969, De Hypotheticis Syllogismis, L. Obertello (ed.), Paideia, Brescia.
De Rijk, L. M.: 1967, Logica Modernorum, Vol. II, Part 2, Van Gorcum, Assen.
Frede, M.: 1974, Die Stoisch Logik, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Gottingen.
Geach, P.: 1980, ‘Aristotle on conjunctive propositions’, in Logic Matters, pp. 13–27, University of California, Berkeley.
John of Salisbury: 1848, Metalogicus in Opera Omnia, J. A. Giles (ed.), Oxford.
John of Salisbury: 1909, Policraticus, C. J. Webb (ed.), London.
Martin, C. J.: 1983, ‘The Compendium Logicae Porretanum: A Survey Of Philosophical Logic From The School Of Gilbert Of Poitiers’, Cahiers De L' Institut Du Moyen-Age Grec Et Latin, 46, pp. xviii-xlvi.
Martin, C. J.: 1986, ‘William's Machine’, Journal of Philosophy, Vol. LXXXIII, No. 10, pp. 564–572.
Martin, C. J.: 198+, ‘Some Embarrassing Arguments and Surprising Conclusions in Twelfth Century Logic’, Proceeding of the Seventh Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics, Poitier 1985, Vrin, Paris.
Mates, B.: 1961, Stoic Logic, University of California, Berkeley.
Peter Abaelard: 1927, ‘Logica Ingredentibus’, 3. Die Glossen Zu Peri Hermenias ed. B. Geyer in Peter Abaelards Philosophische Schriften, Beitrage Zur Geschichte Der Philosophie Des Mittelalters, Bd. XXI, 1–3.
Peter Abaelard: 1954, Pietero Abaelardo Scritti Filosofici ed. M. dal Pra, Fratelli Bocca Editori, Milan.
Peter Abaelard: 1970, Dialectica, 2nd edn., ed. L. M. L. M. de Rijk, van Gorcum, Assen.
Routley, R. & Routley, V.: 1984, ‘Negation and Contradiction’, Research Series In Logic and Metaphysics, Department of Philosophy, Australian National University.
Shehaby, N.: 1973, The Propositional Logic Of Avicenna: A Translation from al-Shifta: al-Qiyas, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Tweedale, M.: 1976, Abaelard On Universals, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martin, C.J. Something amazing about the Peripatetic of Pallet: Abaelard's development of Boethius' account of conditional propositions. Argumentation 1, 419–436 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209738
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209738