Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Language for a causal conditional logic foundations and objectives

Is it possible to formalize dependent origination?

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  1. Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua, Fraenkel, Abraham A., Levy Azriel (1958). Set Foundation Theory. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam-London, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bhattacharyya, Kamaleswar (1978). The Dialectical Method of Nāgārjuna, transl. of VigrahavyāvartanĪ, ed. Johnston-Kunst, Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bhattacharyya, Sibajiban (1984). Some Unique Features of Buddhist Logic. First International Conference on Buddhism and National Cultures, New Delhi.

  4. Bugault, Guy (1983). ‘Logic and Dialectics in the Madhyamakakārikās’. Journal of Indian Philosophy 11, pp. 7–76.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carnap, Rudolph (1969). The Logical Structure of the World. Pseudo-Problems in Philosophy. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chan, Wing-Tsit (1973). A Source Book on Chinese Philosophy. Princeton University, Princeton, New-Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chenique, Francois (1975). Eléments de Logique Classique. Série Logique et Informatique, Dunod. Bordas, Paris, Bruxelles, Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cook, Francis (1977). Hua-Yen Buddhism. Pennsylvania State University Press.

  9. Kleene, Stephen Cole (1967). Mathematical Logic John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New-York-London-Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krivine, Jean-Louis (1969). Théorie Axiomatique des Ensembles. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lamotte, Etienne (1944, 1949, 1970, 1976, 1980). Traité de la Grande Vertu de Sagesse de Nāgārjuna. Bibliothèque du Museon, Louvain. Vol. 1 (1966), vol. 2 (1967), vol. 3 (1970), vol. 4 (1976), vol. 5 (1980).

  12. La Vallée-Poussin, Louis de (1907, 1910, 1911). Madhyamakāvatāra de Candrakīrti. Le Muséon, Louvain.

    Google Scholar 

  13. La Vallée-Poussin, Louis de (1923–1931). Abhidharmakośa de Vasubandhu. Mélanges Chinois et Bouddhiques, vol. XVI, Institut belge des Hautes Etudes Chinoises, Bruxelles, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lyndon, Roger C. (1966). Notes on Logic. American Book-Van Nostrand Reinhold. New-York, Toronto, London, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  15. MacDermott, A. C. Senape (1970). An Eleventh-century Buddhist Logic of “Exists”. Humanities Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Matilal, Bimal Krishna (1971). ‘Negation and the Mādhyamika Dialectic’ in Epistemology, Logic and Grammar in Indian Philosophical Analysis. The Hague, Mouton, pp. 146–167.

    Google Scholar 

  17. May, Jacques (1959). Prasannapadā Madhyamakavrtti de Candrakīrtī. Adrien Maisonneuve, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nakamura, Hajime (1958). Buddhist Logic Expounded by Means of Symbolic Logic. Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, Tokyo, vol. 7, 1, pp. 375–395.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ruegg, David Seyfort (1977). ‘The Uses of the Four Positions of the Catuskoti and the Problem of the Description of Reality in Mahāyāna Buddhism’. Journal of Indian Philosophy 5, pp. 1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schock, Rolf (1968). Logics without Existence Assumptions. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockhohn.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Spisani, Franco (1970–1977). ‘Productive Logic’. International Logic Review 1–15, Bologne.

  22. Stcherbatsky, Théodore (1926). La théorie de la connaissance et la logique chez les bouddhistes tardifs. Annales du Musée Guimet, Bibliothèque d'études, Librairie Orientaliste P. Geuthner, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stcherbatsky, Théodore (1927). Conception of the Nirvāna. Mouton, London, The Hague, Paris, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stcherbatsky, Théodore (1930). Buddhist Logic. Dover Publications, New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tarski, Alfred (1972). ‘Concepts fondamentaux de la méthodologie des sciences déductives’ in Logique, sémantique, métamathématique, Armand Colin, vol. 1, Paris, pp. 67–116.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tarski, Alfred (1974). ‘Le problème de la définissabilité et de l'indépendance mutuelle des concepts’ in Logique, sémantique, métamathématique, Armand Colin, vol. 2, Paris, pp. 23–46.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tarski, Alfred (1974). ‘La conception sémantique de la vérité et les fondements de la sémantique’ in Logique, sémantique, métamathématique, Armand Colin, vol. 2, Paris, pp. 265–305.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yamaguchi, Susumu (1929). ‘Vigraha-vyāvartanī de Nāgārjuna’. Journal Asiatique 225(1), pp. 1–85.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Pierre Basso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Basso, P. Language for a causal conditional logic foundations and objectives. J Indian Philos 16, 123–166 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209708

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209708

Keywords

Search

Navigation