Skip to main content
Log in

Correlated and uncorrelated fitness landscapes and how to tell the difference

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The properties of multi-peaked “fitness landscapes” have attracted attention in a wide variety of fields, including evolutionary biology. However, relaively little attention has been paid to the properties of the landscapes themselves. Herein, we suggest a framework for the mathematical treatment of such landscapes, including an explicit mathematical model. A central role in this discussion is played by the autocorrelation of fitnesses obtained from a random walk on the landscape. Our ideas about average autocorrelations allow us to formulate a condition (satisfied by a wide class of landscapes we call AR(1) landscapes) under which the average autocorrelation approximates a decaying exponential. We then show how our mathematical model can be used to estimate both the globally optimal fitnesses of AR(1) landscapes and their local structure. We illustrate some aspects of our method with computer experiments based on a single family of landscapes (Kauffman's “N-k model”), that is shown to be a generic AR(1) landscape. We close by discussing how these ideas might be useful in the “tuning” of combinatorial optimization algorithms, and in modelling in the experimental sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Binder K, Young A (1986) Spinglasses: experimental facts, theoretical concepts, and open questions. Rev Mod Phys 54:801

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady R (1985) Optimization strategies gleaned from biological evolution. Nature 317:804

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L (1968) Probability. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • David H (1970) Order statistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigen M, McCaskill J, Schuster P (1988) Molecular quasi-species. J Phys Chem 92:6881

    Google Scholar 

  • Feller W (1965) An introduction to probability theory and its applications, vol 1, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Feller W (1972) An introduction to probability theory and its applications, vol 2, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Garey M, Johnson D (1979) Computers and intractability: a guide to the theory of incomputability. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumbel E (1985) Statistics of extremes. Colorado University, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Herstein I (1964) Topics in algebra. Blaisdell, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland J (1981) Genetic algorithms and adaptation. Technical Report # 34, University of Michigan Cognitive Sciences Department Ann Arbor, Mich

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlin S, Taylor H (1975) A first course in stochastic processes. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlin S, Taylor H (1981) A second course in stochastic processes. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman S, Levin S (1987) Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. J Theor Biol 128:11–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman S, (1989) Complex systems. In: Stein DL (eds) Proceedings of the 1988 Summer School on Complex Systems in Santa Fe, NM. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman S, Weinberger E, Perelson A (1988) Maturation of the immune response via adaptive walks on affinity landscapes. In: Perelson AS (eds) Theoretical immunology, part I. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt C, Vecci M (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick S, Toulouse G (1985) Configuration space analysis of Travelling Salesman Problems. J Phys 46:1277

    Google Scholar 

  • Macken, C, Perelson, A (1989) Protein evolution on rugged landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:6191–6195

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot B (1982) The fractal geometry of nature. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer RG (1989) Complex systems. In: Stein DL (eds) Proceedings of the 1988 Summer School on Complex Systems in Santa Fe, NM. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Papoulis A (1965) Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley M (1981) Spectral analysis and time series. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JM (1970) Natural selection and the concept of a protein space. Nature 225:563

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein DL (1989) Complex systems. In: Stein DL (ed) Proceedings of the 1988 Summer School on Complex Systems in Santa Fe, NM. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger E (1987a) A stochastic generalization of Eigen's model of natural selection. PhD Thesis, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York, NY Available from University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Mich

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger E (1987b) A model of natural selection that exhibits a dynamic phase transition. J Stat Phys 49:1011–1028

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger E (1988) A more rigorous derivation of some results on rugged fitness landscapes. J Theor Biol 134:125–129

    Google Scholar 

  • White SR (1984) Concepts of scale in simulated annealing. Proc ICCD

  • Wright S (1932) The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. In: Proceedings 6th Congress on Genetics 1:356

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weinberger, E. Correlated and uncorrelated fitness landscapes and how to tell the difference. Biol. Cybern. 63, 325–336 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00202749

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00202749

Keywords

Navigation