Skip to main content
Log in

Anorectal malformations — results of treatment and long-term follow-up in 208 patients

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During a 20-year period (1964–1983) 208 patients with anorectal malformations (143 males, 65 females) were treated; 98 had low and 110 had high or intermediate malformations. Associated anomalies were detected in 67.8%. The overall mortality in the series was 14.4%; most deaths were related to associated anomalies and/or prematurity. Four different procedures were used for high and intermediate anomalies: (1) abdominoperineal (18 cases); (2) sacroabdominoperineal (38); (3) sacroperineal (8); and (4) posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (7). Neonatal anoplasty was used to correct male low anomalies. Female low and intermediate anomalies with vestibular fistula were treated with anal transposition. More than one-half of the patients with high or intermediate anomalies had complications related to surgical therapy. Major secondary surgery was performed in 41 cases (12 resections of megarectum, 29 late sphincter reconstructions). Of the living patients, 90% (159/178) were followed up for 5–25 years. A majority (93%) of the patients with low anomalies had a good outcome at the last follow-up examination. In patients with high and intermediate anomalies continence improved with time; the greatest improvement occurred after 10 years of age. At the last follow-up examination 73% of the patients with high or intermediate anomalies had acceptable social continence. Manometric evaluation revealed a rectoanal inhibitory reflex in all assessed patients with a low anomaly, indicating a functioning internal sphincter. In patients with intermediate and high anomalies a rectoanal inhibitory reflex was found only when full-thickness terminal bowel had been used in the reconstruction (by perineal and posterior sagittal repair); presence of the reflex correlated with superior fecal control. Acceptable fecal continence may be achieved in the majority of patients with anorectal anomalies. Operative methods that optimally utilize the voluntary sphincters and preserve the potential internal sphincter in the terminal rectal pouch seem to facilitate earlier development of fecal continence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arhan P, Faverdin C, Devroede G, Dubois F, Couprin L, Pellerin D (1976) Manometric assessment of continence after surgery for imperforate anus. J Pediatr Surg 11: 157–166

    Google Scholar 

  2. de Vries P, Pena A (1982) Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. J Pediatr Surg 17: 638–643

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hecker WC, Holschneider AM, Kraeft H, Neuman M (1980) Complications, lethality and long term result after surgery of anorectal atresia. Z Kinderchir 29: 238–244

    Google Scholar 

  4. Holschneider AM, Hecker WCh, Schimmel K (1983) Ergebnisse kontinenzverbessernder Operationen nach anorektalen Fehlbildungen. In: Hofmann-v.Kap-herr S (ed) Anorektale Fehlbildungen. Fischer. Stuttgart-New York, pp 223–228

    Google Scholar 

  5. Holschneider AM (1983) Elektromanometrie des Enddarms. Urban & Schwarzenberg, München, Wien, Baltimore, pp 213–218

    Google Scholar 

  6. Iwai N, Hashimoto K, Goto Y, Majima S (1984) Long term results after surgical correction of anorectal anomalies. Z Kinderchir 39: 35–39

    Google Scholar 

  7. Järvenpää AL (1982) Prognosis of very premature infants. Duodecim 98: 848–854

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kiesewetter WB, Chang JHT (1977) Imperforate anus: a five to thirty year follow-up perspective. Prog Pediatr Surg 10: 111–120

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kiesewetter WB, Hoon A (1979) Imperforate anus: an analysis of mortalities during a 25-year period. Progr Pediatr Surg 13: 211–214

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kiesewetter WB, Sukarochana K, Sieber WK (1965) Frequency of aganglionosis associated with imperforate anus. Surgery 58: 877–890

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kiesewetter WB (1967) Imperforate anus II. The rationale and technique of the sacro-abdomino-perineal operation. J Pediatr Surg 2: 106–110

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kottmeier PK, Dziadiw R (1967) The complete release of the levator ani sling in fecal incontinence. J Pediatr Surg 2: 111–117

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meissner F (1983) In: Hoffman-v.Kap-herr S (ed) Anorektale Fehlbildungen. Fischer Stuttgart-New York, pp 235–237

    Google Scholar 

  14. Molander ML, Frenckner B (1985) Anal sphincter function after surgery for high imperforate anus — a long term follow-up investigation. Z Kinderchir 40: 91–96

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mollard P, Marechal JM, de Beaujeu MJ (1978) Surgical treatment of high imperforate anus with definition of the puborectalis sling by anterior perineal approach. J Pediatr Surg 13: 499–504

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nixon HH, Puri P (1977) The results of anorectal anomalies: a thirteen to twenty year follow-up. J Pediatr Surg 12: 27–37

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nixon HH (1984) Possibilities and results of management of bowel incontinence in children. Prog Pediatr Surg 17: 105–114

    Google Scholar 

  18. Parkkulainen KV, Hjelt L, Sulamaa M (1959) Anal atresia combined with aganglionic megacolon. Acta Chir Scand 118: 252

    Google Scholar 

  19. Partridge JP, Gough MH (1961) Congenital abnormalities of the anus and rectum. Br J Surg 49: 37–50

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pena A (1983) Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty as a secondary operation for the treatment of fecal incontinence. J Pediatr Surg 18: 762–773

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pena A (1988) Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: results in the management of 332 cases of anorectal malformations. Pediatr Surg Int 3: 94–104

    Google Scholar 

  22. Powell RW, Sherman JQ, Raffensperger JG (1982) Megarectum: a rare complication of imperforate anus repair and its surgical correction by endorectal pull-through. J Pediatr Surg 17: 786–795

    Google Scholar 

  23. Puri P, Nixon HH (1976) Levatorplasty: a secondary operation for fecal incontinence following primary operation for anorectal agenesis. J Pediatr Surg 11: 77–82

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rintala R, Lindahl H, Louhimo I (1986) VATER association and anorectal malformations. Z Kinderchir 41: 22–26

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rintala R, Lindahl H, Louhimo I (1988) Biofeedback conditioning for fecal incontinence in anorectal malformations. Pediatr Surg Int 3: 418–421

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rintala R (1990) Postoperative internal sphincter function in anorectal malformations — a manometric study. Pediatr Surg Int 5: 127–130

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stephens FD, Smith ED (1971) Anorectal malformations in children. Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stephens FD, Smith ED (1986) Classification, identification and assessment of surgical treatment of anorectal anomalies. Pediatr Surg Int 1: 200–205

    Google Scholar 

  29. Swenson O, Donnellan WL (1967) Preservation of the puborectalis sling in imperforate anus repair. Surg Clin Noorth Am 47: 173–193

    Google Scholar 

  30. Templeton JM, Ditesheim JA (1985) High imperforate anus — quantitative results of long term fecal continence. J Pediatr Surg 20: 645–652

    Google Scholar 

  31. Temtamy SA, Miller JD (1974) Extending the scope of the VATER association: definition of the VATER syndrome. J Pediatr 82: 104–106

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Offprint requests to: R. Rintala

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rintala, R., Lindahl, H. & Louhimo, I. Anorectal malformations — results of treatment and long-term follow-up in 208 patients. Pediatr Surg Int 6, 36–41 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00174882

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00174882

Key words

Navigation