Skip to main content
Log in

The costs of secondary sexual characters in the lekking great snipe (Gallinago media)

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Recent studies of the lekking great snipe (Gallinago media) have shown that male mating success increases with display rate and the amount of white on the tail. An obvious question then arises: what is setting the limits to male display rate and to the evolution of even whiter tails? In this study the costs of these two traits are considered. In the case of the white on the tail, almost no predation was observed during the display period. However, predation on the winter grounds and/or during migration cannot be ruled out. Males differed in the amount of white on the tail between years. It is suggested that increasing the amount of white is costly, though the reason for this is still unknown. In the case of display rate, it is shown that predation cannot be a considerable cost, again because of the near absence of predation on the leks. Instead, it is shown that male displays are energetically costly. The daily energy expenditure of displaying males was estimated to be on average 4 times the basal metabolic rate, which is close to the supposed maximum sustainable work load for birds. Furthermore, males lost on average 1.8 g per h (1.7% of the body mass) which is about 7.2 g (6.8%) during a night of display activity. Males do gain some weight during the day when no displays are performed but loose on average 9 g during an 11-day period in the early part of the breeding season. These results indicate that high energetic demands set the limits to male display performance and that males do not have to trade off the benefit of attracting females by their displays against a cost of attracting predators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alatalo RV, Höglund J, Lundberg A (1991) Lekking in the black grouse — a test of male viability. Nature 352:155–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1982) Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisement. Biol J Linn Soc 17:375–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1983) On the function of conspicuous seasonal plumages in birds. Anim Behav 31:1262–1263

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1986) Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40:804–816

    Google Scholar 

  • Aschoff J, Pohl H (1970) Rhythmic variations in energy metabolism. Fed Proc 29:1541–1552

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL, Gibson R (1985) Leks and the unanimity of female choice. In: Greenwood PJ, Harvey PH, Slatkin M (eds) Evolution, essays in the honour of John Maynard Smith. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, pp 301–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Cade WH (1975) Acoustically orienting parasites: Fly phonotaxis to cricket song. Science 190:312–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Cade WH (1979) The evolution of alternative male reproductive strategies in field crickets. In: Blum MS, Blum NA (eds) Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York, pp 343–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Cade WH, Wyatt DR (1984) Factors affecting calling behaviour in field crickets, Telogryllus and Gryllus (age, weight, density and parasites). Behaviour 88:61–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Drent RH, Daan S (1980) The prudent parent: energetic adjustments in avian breeding. Ardea 68:225–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans MR (1991) The size of male adornments in the scarlet-tufted malachite sunbird varies with environmental conditions. Anim Behav 42:797–804

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman DS Jr, Gagnon J, Hoffman R, Simpson J (1987) Statvew II Manual. Abacus Concepts, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford Univ Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RM, Bradbury JW (1985) Sexual selection in lekking sage grouse: phenotypic correlates of male mating success. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:117–123

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glue DE (1977) Feeding ecology of the short-eared owl in Britain and Ireland. Bird Study 24:70–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (1990) Biological signals as handicaps. J Theor Biol 144:517–546

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hails CJ, Bryant DM (1979) Reproductive energetics of a free-living bird. J Anim Ecol 48:471–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund J (1989) Sexual selection and the evolution of leks in the Great snipe (Gallinago media). PhD thesis, Uppsala University

  • Höglund J, Lundberg A (1987) Sexual selection in a monomorphic lek-breeding bird: correlates of male mating success in the great snipe (Gallinago media). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:211–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund J, Robertson JGM (1990) Female preferences, male decision rules and the evolution of leks in the great snipe Gallinago media. Anim Behav 40:15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund J, Eriksson M, Lindell LE (1990a) Females prefer males with white tails in the lekking great snipe. Anim Behav 40:23–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund J, Kålås J-A, Løfaldli L (1990b) Sexual dimorphism in the lekking great snipe. Ornis Scand 21:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwasa Y, Pomiankowski A, Nee S (1991) The evolution of costly mate preferences II. The handicap principle. Evolution 45:1431–1442

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson AC (1919) The moults and sequence of plumages of the British waders. Brit Birds 12:172–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten M, Piersma T (1987) High levels of energy expenditure in shorebirds; metabolic adaptations to an energetically expensive way of life. Ardea 75:175–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M (1982) Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ (1991) The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Klump GM, Gerhardt HC (1987) Use of non-arbitrary acoustic criteria in mate choice by female gray treefrogs. Nature 326:286–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlova ER (1962) The fauna of the USSR. Vol. 2. Academy of Sciences USSR, Moscow, Natl Sci Found Transl

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:3721–3725

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemnell P-A (1978) Social behaviour of the great snipe Capella media at the arena display. Ornis Scand 9:146–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifson N, McClintock R (1966) Theory of use of the turnover rates of body water for measuring energy and material balance. J Theor Biol 37:139–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg P (1983) Relations between the diet of Fennoscandian peregrines Falco peregrinus and organochlorines and mercury in their eggs and feathers with a comparison to the gyrfalcon Falco rusticolos. Ph D thesis, University of Gothenburg

  • Mikkola H, Sulkava S (1969) On occurrence and feeding habits of short-eared owl in Finland 1964–68. Ornis Fenn 46:188–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen RK (1973) The D2 18O method of measuring the energy metabolism of free-living animals. In: Gassman JA (ed) Ecological energetics of homeotherms: a view compatible with ecological modeling. Utah State University, Utah, pp 32–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy KA (1980) CO2 production in animals: analysis of potential errors in the doubly labeled water method. Am J Physiol 238:446–473

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donald P (1980) Genetic models of sexual selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomiankowski A (1987) Sexual selection: the handicap principle does work — sometimes. Proc Roy Soc Lond (B) 231:123–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson JGM (1986) Female choice, male strategies and the role of vocalizations in the Australian frog Uperoleia rugosa. Anim Behav 34:773–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MJ (1985) The Túngara Frog. A study in sexual selection and communication. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MJ, Tuttle MD, Taft LK (1981) The costs and benefits of frog chorusing behaviour. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:273–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MJ, Tuttle MD, Rand AS (1982) Bat predation and sexual advertisement in a neotropical frog. Am Nat 119:136–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MJ, Tuttle MJ, Barclay RMR (1983) Behavioural responses of the frog-eating bat to sonic frequencies. J Comp Physiol 150:413–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ, De Jong MCM (1991) The evolutionary stable strategy for secondary sexual characters. Behav Ecol 2:16–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Vehrencamp SL, Bradbury JW, Gibson RM (1989) The energetic cost of display in male sage grouse. Anim Behav 38:885–896

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells KD, Taigen TL (1986) The effects of social interactions on calling energetics in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:9–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerterp KR, Bryant DM (1984) Energetics of free existence in swallows and martins (Hirundinidae) during breeding: a comparative study using doubly-labeled water. Oecologia 62:376–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JB, Prints A (1986) Energetics of growth in nestling savannah sparrows: a comparison of doubly labeled water and laboratory estimates. Condor 88:74–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection — a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53:205–214

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Offprint requests to: J. Höglund

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Höglundi, J., Kålås, J.A. & Fiske, P. The costs of secondary sexual characters in the lekking great snipe (Gallinago media). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30, 309–315 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170596

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170596

Keywords

Navigation