Skip to main content
Log in

Robustness of automated data choices of smoothing parameter in image regularization

  • Papers
  • Published:
Statistics and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Statistical image restoration techniques are oriented mainly toward modelling the image degradation process in order to recover the original image. This usually involves formulating a criterion function that will yield some optimal estimate of the desired image. Often these techniques assume that the point spread function is known when the image is restored and indeed when we estimate the smoothing parameter. However in practice this assumption may not hold. This paper investigates empirically the effect of mis-specifying the point spread function on some data-based estimates of the regularization parameter and hence on the image reconstructions. Comparisons of image reconstruction quality are based on the mean absolute difference in pixel intensities between the true and reconstructed images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archer, G. E. B. and Titterington, D. M. (1995) On some Bayesian regularization methods for image restoration. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 4, 989–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Barone, P. and Rossi, C. (1989) Deconvolution with partially known kernel of non-negative signals. IAC Technical Report.

  • Bryan, R. K. and Skilling, J. (1980) Deconvolution by maximum entropy, as illustrated by application to the jet of M87. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 191, 69–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. P.-S. and Kay, J. W. (1991) Smoothing parameter selection in image restoration. In G. Roussas (ed) The Proceedings of NATO ASI Conference on Nonparametric Functional Estimation and Related Topics, pp. 201–211, Kluwer Academic Press.

  • Craig, I. J. D. and Brown, J. C. (1986) Inverse Problems in astron- omy: a guide to inversion strategies for remotely sensed data. Adam Hilger, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galatsanos, N. P. and Katsaggelos, A. K. (1992) Methods for choosing the regularization parameter and estimating the noise variance in image restoration and their relation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 1, 322–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golub, G. H., Heath, M. and Wahba, G. (1979) Generalized cross validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter. Technometrics, 21, 215–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, R. C. and Woods, R. E. (1992) Digital Image Processing. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, A. and Chan, K. P.-S. (1995) The effects of misspecification of blur in image regularization: a comparison of methods for smoothing parameter selection. In preparation.

  • Green, P. J. (1993) Contribution to the discussion of Vardi and Lee. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B 55, 604–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gull, S. F. and Skilling, J. (1984) Maximum entropy method in image processing. IEE Proceedings F, 131, 646–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. and Titterington, D. M. (1987) Common structure for choosing smoothing parameters in regression problems, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B 49, 184–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, B. R. (1973) The application of constrained least squares estimation to image restoration by digital computer. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 22, 805–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. W. (1988) A comparison of smoothing parameter choices in image restoration. In J. Kittler, (ed) Pattern Recognition, pp. 587–96, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. W. (1990) A new choice of smoothing parameter for deconvolution problems based on estimation cross-validation. Research Report, University of Glasgow.

  • Rice, A. J. (1986) Choice of smoothing parameter in deconvolution problems. Contemporary Mathematics, 59, 137–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savakis, A. E. and Trussell, H. J. (1993) Blur identification using residual spectral matching. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2, 141–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A. M., Brown, J. C., Kay, J. W. and Titterington, D. M. (1991) A study of methods of choosing the smoothing parameter in image restoration by regularization. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13, 326–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tikhonov, A. N. and Arsenin, V. Y. (1977) Solutions of Ill-posed Problems. Winston, Washington D. C.

  • Titterington, D. M. (1985a) General structure of regularization procedures in image reconstruction. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 144, 381–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titterington, D. M. (1985b) Common structure of smoothing techniques in statistics. International Statistical Review, 53, 141–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vardi, Y. and Lee, D. (1993) From image deblurring to optimal investments: maximum likelihood solutions for positive linear inverse problems (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B 55, 569–612.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chan, K., Gray, A. Robustness of automated data choices of smoothing parameter in image regularization. Stat Comput 6, 367–377 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143557

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143557

Keywords

Navigation