Skip to main content
Log in

A new theory of voting: Why vote when millions of others do

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

I believe to have shown that a signalling model of voter behavior is bothconsistent with neo-classical economic theory, and in agreement withmany of the important features of the political system. I cannot provethat the theory is a correct one, only that the assumptions appearreasonable, that these assumptions lead to some testable predictions, andthat many of these predictions agree with the available evidence.

The argument may appear to be discomforting to some; I often findit so. For the view here is that important decisions - war, peace, civil rights- are not made on the basis of considered judgment by the citizens.Instead, citizens realize that their votes will not matter and they there-fore do not vote to affect policy. Voters view politics as a game orentertainment; it is only one of many ways to impress one's friends orassociates, and fulfills the same function for many voters that designerjeans do.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerlof, George: 1976, ‘The Economics of Taste and of the Rat Race and Other Woeful Tales’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 90, pp. 599–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter, Orley and Stanley Kelley Jr.: 1975, ‘Determinants of Participation in Presidential Elections’, Journal of Law and Economics 18, pp. 695–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, Howard, S. and H. Douglas Price: 1975, ‘Voter Response to Short-run Economic Conditions: The Asymmetric effects of Prosperity and Recession’, American Political Science Review 69, pp. 1240–1254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, John R.: 1984, ‘Early Projections and Voter Turnout in the 1980 Presidential Election’, Public Choice 43 (2), pp. 195–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Anthony: 1957, An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Laurily K. and Gerald Strom: 1981, ‘Election Night Projections and West Coast Turnout’, American Politics Quarterly 9 (4), pp. 479–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erfle, Stephen E.: 1983, ‘The Welfare Economics of Persuasive Advertising’, Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Harvard University.

  • Fair, R. C.: 1978, ‘The Effects of Economic Events on Votes for President’, Review of Economics and Statistics 60, pp. 159–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, Bruno, S.: 1979, ‘Poliometrics of Government Behavior in a Democracy’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 81 (2), pp. 308–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, Bruno S. and Friedrich Schneider: 1978, ‘An Empirical Study of Politico-Economic Interaction in the United States’, Review of Economics and Statistics 60, pp. 174–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonung, L. and E. Wadensjo: 1979, ‘The Effects of Unemployment, Inflation and Real Income Growth on Government Popularity in Sweden’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 82, pp. 343–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalt, Joseph P. and Mark A. Zupan: 1984, ‘Capture and Ideology in the Economic Theory of Politics’, American Economic Review 74, pp. 279–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, James B. and Paul H. Rubin: 1979, ‘Self-Interest, Ideology and Logrolling in Congressional Voting’, Journal of Law and Economics 22, pp. 365–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiewiet, D. Roderick: 1983, Macroeconomics & Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, D. R. and D. R. Kiewiet: 1979, ‘Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal and Collective Economic Judgments in Congressional Voting’, American Journal of Political Science 23, pp. 495–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, Gerald H.: 1971, ‘Short-term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896–1964’, American Political Science Review 65, pp. 131–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, Gerald H.: 1983, ‘The Ecological Fallacy Revisited: Aggregate-versus Individuallevel Findings on Economics and Elections, and Sociotropic Voting’, American Political Science Review 77, pp. 92–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, Kevin: 1983, ‘A Language Theory of Discrimination’, mimeo. University of California, Irvine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, Howard: 1982, Selfishness, Altruism, and Morality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, A. H. and M. Vellrath: 1975, ‘The Effects of Economic Policies on Votes for the Presidency: Some Evidence from Recent Elections’, Journal of Law and Economics 18, pp. 781–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur: 1971, The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, Sam: 1984, ‘Constituent Interest and Congressional Voting’, Journal of Law and Economics 27, pp. 181–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pissarides, C. A.: 1980, ‘British Government Popularity and Economic Performance’, Economic Journal 90, pp. 569–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Larry: 1984, ‘A Test of the Revealed Preference Phenomenon on Congressional Elections’, Paper presented at the 1984 Public Choice Society Meetings.

  • Sears, David O. et al.: 1980, ‘Self-Interest vs. Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting’, American Political Science Review 74, pp. 670–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J.: 1973, ‘General Economic Conditions and National Elections’, American Economic Review 63, pp. 160–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, Finis: 1967, ‘Labor Market Discrimination: An Interpretation of Income Differences in the Rural South’, Journal of Political Economy 75, pp. 225–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, Raymond E. and Steven J. Rosenstone: 1980, Who Votes?, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpin, Kenneth: 1977, ‘Education and Screening’, American Economic Review 67 (3), pp. 949–958.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glazer, A. A new theory of voting: Why vote when millions of others do. Theor Decis 22, 257–270 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134088

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134088

Keywords

Navigation