Skip to main content
Log in

Admissibility of unbiased tests for a composite hypothesis with a restricted alternative

  • Diagnostic and Test Procedures
  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses α-admissiblility and d-admissiblity which are important concepts in studying the performance of statistical tests for composite hypotheses. A sufficient condition for α-admissibility is presented. When α=1/m, the Nomakuchi-Sakata test, which is uniformly more powerful than the likelihood ratio test for hypotheses min (θ1, θ1) = 0 versus min (θ1, θ1) > 0, is generalized for a class of distributions in an exponential family, and its unbiasedness and α-admissibility are shown. Finally, the case of α≠ 1/m is discussed in brief.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Birnbaum, A. (1955). Characterization of complete classes of tests of some multiparameter hypotheses, with applications to likelihood ratio tests, Ann. Math. Statist., 26, 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, R. L. (1989). Uniformly more powerful tests for hypotheses concerning linear inequalities and normal means, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 89, 192–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A., Gatsonis, C. and Marden, J. I. (1983). Hypothsis tests and optimality properties in discrete multivariate analysis, Studies in Econometrics, Time Series and Multivariate Statistics (eds. S.Karlin, T.Amemiya and L. A.Goodman), 379–405, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, S. (1987). Tests uniformly more powerful than uniformly most powerful monotone tests, J. Statist. Plann. Inference. 17, 279–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inada, K. (1978). Some bivariate tests of composite hypothesis with restricted alternative, Rep. Fac. Sci. Kagoshima Univ. Math. Phys. Chem., 11, 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlin, S. (1968). Total Positivity, Vol. 1, Stanford University, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, E. L. (1952). Testing multiparameter hypotheses, Ann. Math. Statist., 23, 541–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, E. L. (1986). Testing Statistical Hypothesea, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nomakuchi, K. and Sakata, T. (1987). A note on testing two-dimensional normal mean, Ann. Inst. Statist. Math., 39, 489–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasabuchi, S. (1980). A test of a multivariate normal mean with composite hypotheses determined by linear inequality, Biometrika, 67, 429–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasabuchi, S. (1988a). A multivariate test with composite hypotheses determined by linear inequalities when the covariance matrix has an unknown scale factor, Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ. Ser. A., 42, 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasabuchi, S. (1988b). A multivariate one-sided test with composite hypotheses when the covariance matrix is completely unknown, Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ. Ser. A, 42, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, C. (1956). The admissibility of Hotelling's T 2-test, Ann. Math. Statist., 27, 616–623.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Iwasa, M. Admissibility of unbiased tests for a composite hypothesis with a restricted alternative. Ann Inst Stat Math 43, 657–665 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00121645

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00121645

Key words and phrases

Navigation