The biodiversity sciences represent the disciplines of whole-organism biology, including systematics, ecology, population biology, behaviour and the fields of comparative biology. The biodiversity sciences are critically important to society because it is knowledge of whole-organisms that is essential for managing and conserving the world's species. Because of an acceleration in environmental degradation and global biodiversity loss in recent decades, the need for the biodiversity sciences has never been more urgent. Yet, biodiversity science is not well supported relative to other fields of science, and thus the need for knowledge about organisms and their environment is far outstripping biologists' ability to provide it. National and international capacity for biodiversity science must therefore be increased substantially. Each nation should establish a national biodiversity research programme coordinated across all government agencies. An international biodiversity research programme should also be established, perhaps with an organizational structure that parallels the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme. Biodiversity scientists must assume a leadership role in educating the public and bringing about policy changes that will enhance our understanding of the world's species and their ecosystems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AbramovitzJ.N. (1991) Investing in Biological Diversity. U.S. Research and Conservation Efforts in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
ArroyoM.T.K., RavenP.H. and SarukhanJ. (1992) Biodiversity. In An Agenda of Science for Environment and Development into the 21st Century (J.C.I.Dooge, G.T.Goodman, J.W.M.laRivière, J.Marton-Lefèvre, T.O'Riordan and F.Praderie, eds) pp. 207–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
AyadW.G. (1994) The CGIAR and the Convention on Biological Diversity. In Widening Perspectives on Biodiversity (A.F.Krattiger, J.A.McNeely, W.H.Lesser, K.R.Miller, Y.St.Hill and R.Senanayake, eds) pp. 243–54. Gland. Switzerland: IUCN and IAE.
BartzB., OpitzH and RichterE. (eds) (1992) Museums of the World, 4th edition. Munich: K. G. Saur Verlag.
BekoeD.A. and PrageL. (1992) Capacity building. In An Agenda of Science for Environment and Development into the 21st Century (J.C.I.Dooge, G.T.Goodman, J.W.M.laRivière, J.Marton-Lefèvre, T.O'Riordan and F.Praderie, eds) pp. 255–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Federal Coordinating Council for Science, Engineering, and Technology (FCCSET) (1993) Federal Research on Environmental Biology. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
GaillardJ. (1990) Science in the developing world: foreign aid and national policies at a crossroad. Ambio 19, 348–53.
GaillardJ. (1991) Scientists in the Third World. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
GroombridgeB. (ed) (1992) Global Biodiversity. London: Chapman & Hall.
JanzenD.H. (1992) A south-north perspective on science in the management, use, and economic development of biodiversity. In Conservation of Biodiversity for Sustainable Development (O.T.Sanlund, K.Hindar and A.H.D.Brown, eds) pp. 27–52. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
LubchencoJ., OlsonA.M., BrubakerL.B., CarpenterS.B., HollandM.M., HubbellS.P., LevinS.A., MacMahonJ.A., MatsonP.A., MelilloJ.M., MooneyH.A., PetersonC.H., PulliamH.R., RealL.A., RegalP.J. and RisserP.G. (1991) The sustainable biosphere initiative: an ecological research agenda. Ecology 72, 371–412.
MayorF. (1988) The environmental crisis and the duty of scientists. Devel. J. SID 1988, 34–8.
McNeelyJ.A. (1994) Critical issues in the implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity. In Widening Perspectives on Biodiversity (A.F.Krattiger, J.A.McNeely, W.H.Lesser, K.R.Miller, Y.St.Hill and R.Senanayake, eds) pp. 7–10. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN and IAE.
McNeelyJ.A., MillerK.R., ReidW.V., MittermeierR.A. and WernerT.B. (1990) Conserving the World's Biological Diversity. Washington, DC: IUCN, WRI, CI, WWF, World Bank.
MittermeierR.A. and BowlesI.A. (1993) The Global Environment Facility and biodiversity conservation: lessons to date and suggestions for future action. Biodiver. Conserv. 2, 637–55.
MoffatA.S. (1994) Developing nations adapt biotech for own needs. Science 265, 186–7.
MugabeJ. (1994) Technology and biodiversity in Kenya: technological capabilities and institutional systems for conservation. In Widening Perspectives on Biodiversity (A.F.Krattiger, J.A.McNeely, W.H.Lesser, K.R.Miller, Y.St.Hill and R.Senanayake, eds) pp. 81–92. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN and IAE.
National Research Council (NRC) (1992) Conserving biodiversity: a research agenda for Development Agencies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council, (NRC) (1993a) A biological survey for the nation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council (NRC) (1993b) Research to protect, restore, and manage the environment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Science Foundation (NSF) (1992) National Science Foundation Annual Report 1992. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
NewcombeK. and RichardsonK. (1994) A technical review of the Global Environment Facility's Pilot Phase Biodiversity Investment Portfolio: lessons for the Convention on Biological Diversity. In Widening Perspectives on Biodiversity (A.F.Krattiger, J.A.McNeely, W.H.Lesser, K.R.Miller, Y.St.Hill and R.Senanayake, eds) pp. 415–24. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN and IAE.
RavenP. (1990) The politics of preserving biodiversity. Bioscience 40, 769–74.
ReidW.V., LairdS.A., MeyerC.A., GámezR., SittenfeldA., JanzenD.H., CollinM.A. and JumaC. (1993) Biodiversity prospecting: using genetic resources for sustainable development. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
SalamA. (1992) Address. In An agenda of science for environment and development into the 21st century (J.C.I.Dooge, G.T.Goodman, J.W.M.laRivière, J.Marton-Lefèvre, T.O'Riordan and F.Praderie, eds) pp. 25–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SchielC.H. (1990) Promoting indigeneous research capacities in developing countries — The International Foundation for Science (IFS) and its work. Ambio 19, 346–8.
Systematics Agenda 2000 (1994a) Systematics Agenda 2000: Charting the Biosphere. New York: Society of Systematic Biologists, American Society of Plant Taxonomists, Willi Hennig Society, Association of Systematics Collections.
Systematics Agenda 2000 (1994b) Systematics Agenda 2000: Charting the Biosphere. Technical Report. New York: Society of Systematic Biologists, American Society of Plant Taxonomists, Willi Hennig Society, Association of Systematics Collections.
ThomasR., BrownA.G. and FlaihN.T. (1994) Proposed establishment of phytochemical extraction companies in developing countries. In Widening perspectives on biodiversity (A.F.Krattiger, J.A.McNeely, W.H.Lesser, K.R.Miller, Y.St.Hill and R.Senanayake, eds) pp. 309–13. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN and IAE.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (1993) Guidelines for country studies on biological diversity. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.
VitousekP.M., EhrlichP.R., ErhlichA.H. and MatsonP.A. (1986) Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis. Bioscience 36, 368–73.
World Bank (1990) World Development Report 1990 [Poverty]. Washington DC: World Bank.
World Resources Institute (1992) World Resources 1992–93. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
World Resources Institute (1994) World Resources 1994–95. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cracraft, J. The urgency of building global capacity for biodiversity science. Biodivers Conserv 4, 463–475 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056337
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056337