Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating densities, quantiles, quantile densities and density quantiles

  • Estimation
  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To estimate the quantile density function (the derivative of the quantile function) by kernel means, there are two alternative approaches. One is the derivative of the kernel quantile estimator, the other is essentially the reciprocal of the kernel density estimator. We give ways in which the former method has certain advantages over the latter. Various closely related smoothing issues are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azzalini, A. (1981). A note on the estimation of a distribution function and quantiles by a kernel method, Biometrika, 68, 326–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babu, G. J. and Rao, C. R. (1990). Estimation of the reciprocal of the density quantile function at a point, J. Multivariate Anal., 33, 106–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, M. (1984). Relative deficiency of kernel type estimators of quantiles, Ann. Statist., 12, 261–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, M. (1986). On the estimation of the quantile density function, Statist. Probab. Lett., 4, 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. and Sheather, S. J. (1988). On the distribution of a studentized quantile, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 50, 381–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P., DiCiccio, T. J. and Romano, J. P. (1989). On smoothing and the bootstrap, Ann. Statist., 17, 692–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lio, Y. L. and Padgett, W. J. (1991). A note on the asymptotically optimal bandwidth for Nadaraya's quantile estimator, Statist. Probab. Lett., 11, 243–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, H.-G. (1991). Smooth optimum kernel estimators near endpoints, Biometrika, 78, 521–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadaraya, E. A. (1964). Some new estimates for distribution functions, Theory Probab. Appl., 9, 497–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parzen, E. (1979). Nonparametric statistical modelling (with comments), J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 74, 105–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, R.-D. (1981). Nonparametric estimation of smooth distribution functions, Scand. J. Statist., 8, 116–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheather, S. J. (1987). Assessing the accuracy of the sample median: estimated standard errors versus interpolated confidence intervals, Statistical Data Analysis Based on the L1-norm and Related Methods (ed. Y. Dodge), 203–215, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheather, S. J. and Marron, J. S. (1990). Kernel quantile estimators, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 85, 410–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J. W. (1965). Which part of the sample contains the most information?, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 53, 127–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, A. H. (1988). Asymptotically efficient estimation of the sparsity function at a point, Statist. Probab. Lett., 6, 427–432.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, M.C. Estimating densities, quantiles, quantile densities and density quantiles. Ann Inst Stat Math 44, 721–727 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053400

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053400

Key words and phrases

Navigation