Skip to main content
Log in

Sensitivity analysis of M-estimates

  • Estimation
  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bahadur representation of the difference of estimators of regression coefficients for the full data set and for the set from which one observation was deleted is given for the M-estimators which are generated by a continuous ψ-function. The representation is invariant with respect to the scale of residuals and it indicates that the bound of the norm of the difference is proportional to the gross error sensitivity. Then for the ψ-function which corresponds to the median it is shown that the difference of the estimates for the full data and for data without one observation, although being bounded in probability, can be much larger than indicated by the gross error sensitivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson A. C. (1985). Plots, Transformations and Regression: An Introduction to Graphical Methods of Diagnostic Regression Analysis, Claredon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates D. M. and Watts D. G. (1988). Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsley D. A., Kuh E. and Welsch R. E. (1980). Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L. (1968). Probability, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee S. and Hadi A. S. (1988). Sensitivity Analysis in Linear Regression, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook R. D. and Weisberg S. (1982). Residuals and Influence in Regression, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csörgö M. and Révész P. (1981). Strong Approximation in Probability and Statistics, Akademia Kiadó, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampel F. R., Rousseeuw P. Y., Ronchetti E. M. and Stahel W. A. (1986). Robust Statistics-The Approach Based on Influence Functions, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand D. J., Daly F., Lunn A. D., McConway K. J. and Ostrowski E. (1994). Handbook of Small Data Sets, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettmansperger T. P. and Sheather S. J. (1992). A cautionary note on the method of least median squares, Amer. Statist., 46, 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber P. J. (1964). Robust estimation of a location parameter, Ann. Math. Statist., 35, 73–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurečková J. (1988). Constistency of M-estimators of vector parameters, Proceedings of the Fourth Prague Symposium on Asymptotic Statistics, 305–312, Charles University, Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liese F. and Vajda I. (1995). Consistency of M-estimators in general models, J. Multivariat. Anal., 50, 93–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason R. L., Gunst R. F. and Hess J. L. (1989). Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao C. R. and Zhao L. C. (1992). On the consistency of M-estimate in linear model obtained through an estimating equation, Statist. Probab. Lett., 14, 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseeuw P. J. (1993). Unconventional features of positive-breakdown estimators, Report no. 93–26 of University of Antwerp, Department of Mathematics & Computer Science, UIA, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseeuw P. J. and Leroy A. M. (1987). Robust Regression and Outlier Detection, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubio, A. M. and Víšek, J. Á. (1996). A note on asymptotic linearity of M-statistics in nonlinear models, Kybernetika (to appear).

  • Rubio A. M., Quintana F. and Víšek J. Á. (1994). Test for differences between M-estimates of non-linear regression model. Probab. Math. Statist., 14, Facs. 2, 189–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. and Srivastava M. (1990). Regression Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Štěpán J. (1987). Teorie pravděpodobnosti (Probability Theory), Academia, Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandaele W. (1978). Participation in illegitimate activities: Erlich revisted Deterrence and Incapacitation (eds. A. Blumstein, J. Cohen and D. Nagin), 270–335, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Víšek J. Á. (1992a). A proposal of model selection: Stability of linear regression model, Transactions of the Eleventh Prague Conference on Information Theory, Statistical Decision Functions and Random Processes, Volume B, 451–461, Academia, 1990, Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Víšek J. Á. (1992b). Stability of regression estimates with respect to subsamples, Computational Statistics, 7, 183–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Víšek, J. Á. (1994). A cautionary note on the method of least median of squares reconsidered, Transactions of the Twelfth Prague Conference on Information Theory, Statistical Decision Functions and Random Processes, 254–259, Prague.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Víšek, J.Á. Sensitivity analysis of M-estimates. Ann Inst Stat Math 48, 469–495 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00050849

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00050849

Key words and phrases

Navigation