Abstract
It has been shown that the unconditional maximum likelihood estimator of the common odds ratio, risk ratio and risk difference parameters are inconsistent in sparse statification. Under a Poisson sparse-data model, the maximum likelihood estimator for the rate difference, which is the difference of the disease incidence rates among the exposed and the unexposed, is also shown to be biased. The sparse-data asymptotic bias of the maximum likelihood estimator is evaluated numerically and compared with that of the weighted least squares estimators.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen, E. B. (1970). Asymptotic properties of conditional maximum-likelihood estimators, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 32, 283–301.
Breslow, N. E. (1981). Odds ratio estimators when the data are sparse, Biometrika, 68, 73–84.
Breslow, N. E. and Day, N. E. (1987). Statistical Methods in Cancer Research, Vol. 2 — The Design and Analysis of Cohort Studies, Oxford University Press, New York.
Greenland, S. (1982). Interpretation and estimation of summary ratios under heterogeneity, Statistics in Medicine, 1, 217–227.
Greenland, S. and Robins, J. M. (1985). Estimation of a common effect parameter from sparse follow-up data, Biometrics, 41, 55–68.
Grizzle, J. E., Starmer, C. F. and Koch, G. G. (1969). Analysis of categorical data by linear models, Biometrics, 25, 489–504.
Rothman, K. J. and Boice, J. D. (1982). Epidemiologic Analysis with a Programmable Calculator, Epidemiology Resources Inc., Boston.
Sato, T. (1990). Confidence intervals for effect parameters common in cancer epidemiology, Environmental Health Perspectives, 87, 95–101.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Sato, T. On inconsistency of the common rate difference estimators from sparse follow-up data. Ann Inst Stat Math 44, 529–535 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00050703
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00050703