Abstract
In this paper we consider experimental settings where υ treatments are being tested in b 1 rows and b 2 columns of sizes k 1i and k 2j , respectively, i=1,2,..., b 1, j=1,2,..., b 2. Some sufficient conditions for designs to be E-optimal in these classes are derived and some necessary and sufficient conditions for the E-optimality of some special classes of row and column designs are presented. Examples are also given to illustrate this theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brzeskwiniewicz, H. (1988). On the E-optimality of block designs with unequal block sizes, Biometrical J., 31, 631–635.
Clatworthy, W. R. (1973). Tables of Two-Associate-Class Partially Balanced Designs, National Bureau of Standards, Washington.
Eccleston, J. and Kiefer, J. (1981). Relationships of optimality for individual factors of a design, J. Statist. Plann. Inference, 5, 213–219.
Eccleston, J. and Russel, K. (1975). Connectedness and orthogonality in multi-factor designs, Biometrika, 62, 341–345.
Ehrenfeld, S. (1955). On the efficiency of experimental design, Ann. Math. Statist., 26, 247–255.
Jacroux, M. (1982). Some E-optimal designs for the one-way and two-way elimination of heterogeneity, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 44, 253–261.
Jacroux, M. (1985). Some E and MV-optimal designs for the two-way elimination of heterogeneity, Ann. Inst. Statist. Math., 37, 557–566.
Lee, K. Y. and Jacroux, M. (1987). Some sufficient conditions for the E and MV-optimality of block designs having blocks of unequal size, Ann. Inst. Statist. Math., 39, 385–397.
Pal, S. (1977). On designs with one-way and two-way elimination of heterogeneity, Calcutta Statist. Assoc. Bull., 26, 79–103.
Raghavarao, D. and Federer, W. T. (1975). On connectedness in two-way elimination of heterogeneity designs, Ann. Statist., 3, 730–735.
Seber, G. A. F. (1984). Multivariate Observations, Wiley, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Kozlowska, M., Walkowiak, R. E-optimality of some row and column designs. Ann Inst Stat Math 42, 597–602 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00049310
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00049310