Summary
Guard cell chloroplast numbers were counted in the tamarillo (Cyphomandra betacea (Cav.) Sendt.), the pepino (Solanum muricatum Ait.), and in wild relatives and polyploids of these species. Chloroplast number was found to be a reliable indicator of the euploid level in both species, but in aneuploids the effects of different chromosomes were variable. Some had no effect but in others the effects werepositive and sometimes significantly different from the diploids. Comparison of DNA amounts and plastid numbers in wild Cyphomandra species did not reveal a high correlation between these two characters. These results argue against a purely nucleotypic control of chloroplast number in guard cells in favour of a more complex genotypic system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barclay, P.C. & J.M. Armstrong, 1966. Certain aspects of chromosome number and seed size in induced tetraploid pasture plants. Prox. Xth. Int. Grasslands Congr.: 667–671.
Bennett, M.D., 1972. Nuclear DNA content and minimum generation time in herbaceous plants. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 191: 109–135.
Bingham, E.T., 1968. Stomatal chloroplasts in alfalfa at four ploidy levels. Crop Sci. 8: 509–510.
Birchler, J.A. & K.J.Newton, 1981. Modulation of protein levels in chromosomal dosage series of maize: the biochemical basis of aneuploid syndromes. Genetics 99: 247–266.
Butterfass, T., 1973. Control of plastid division by means of nuclear DNA amount. Protoplasma 76: 167–195.
Butterfass, T., 1979. Patterns of Chloroplast Reproduction: A Developmental Approach to Protoplasmic Plant Anatomy. Cell Biology Monographs, Vol. 6, Springer-Verlag, Wien.
Butterfass, T., 1983. A nucleotypic control of chloroplast reproduction. Protoplasma 118: 71–74.
Cavalier-Smith, T., 1985. Introduction: The Evolutionary Significance of Genome Size. pp 1–36. in T.Cavalier-Smith (Ed.). The Evolution of Genome Size. Wiley, Chichester, Great Britain.
Chaudhari, H.K. & J.R.Barrow, 1975. Identification of cotton haploids by stomatal chloroplast-count technique. Crop Sci. 15: 760–763.
Darlington, C.D. & L.F.LaCour, 1976. The Handling of Chromosomes. 6th Edition. George Allen & Unwin Ltd., London.
DeMaine, M.J., 1987. Comparisons of cell characters in leaves of dihaploid potatoes, their chromosome-doubled derivatives and parthenogenetic tetraploid plants. Potato Res. 30: 253–266.
Draper, N.R. & H.Smith, 1966. Applied regression analysis. Wiley, New York.
Evans, A., 1955. The production and identification of polyploids in red clover, white clover and lucerne. New Phytol. 54: 149–162.
Frandsen, N.O., 1968. Die Plastidenzahl als Merkmal bei der Kartoffel. Theor. Appl. Genet. 38: 153–167.
Hagemann, R., 1979. Genetics and molecular biology of plastids of higher plants. Stadler Genetics Symposia 11: 91–115.
John, B. & G.L.G.Miklos, 1988. The Eukaryote Genome in Development and Evolution. Allen & Unwin, London.
Meinl, G. & D.Rothacker, 1961. Chloroplastenzahl und Valenzstufe bei verschiedenen Kartoffelspecies. Z. Bot. 49: 380–392.
Najcevska, C.M. & G.J.Speckmann, 1968. Numbers of chloroplasts and pollen grain pores in diploid and tetraploid varieties of some Trifolium species. Euphytica 17: 357–362.
Pringle, G.J. & B.G. Murray, 1989. Karyotype diversity and nuclear DNA variation in Cyphomandra. Proc. III Int. Solanaceae Congr., Bogota, Colombia. July 1988 (in press).
Pyke, K.A. & R.M.Leech, 1987. The control of chloroplast number in wheat mesophyll cells. Planta 170: 416–420.
Santen, E.van & M.D.Casler, 1986. Evaluation of indirect ploidy indicators in Dactylis L. subspecies. Crop Sci. 26: 848–852.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Standring, L.S., Pringle, G.J. & Murray, B.G. The control of chloroplast number in Solanum muricatum Ait. and Cyphomandra betacea (Cav.) Sendt. and its value as an indicator of polyploidy. Euphytica 47, 71–77 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00040366
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00040366