Skip to main content
Log in

Floristic variation within kerangas (heath) forest: re-evaluation of data from Sarawak and Brunei

  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The variation in species composition of trees ≥7.6 cm gbh in thirty-eight plots (mostly c. 0.2 ha in extent) from physiognomically-defined kerangas forest were re-analyzed by principal components analysis ordination (species centering and standardization by sample norm). Analyses were performed separately on basal area abundances, on the densities of trees in three size classes (≥7.6, ≥30.5 and ≥61.0 cm gbh) and on the density of small and large trees (7.6-<30.5 and 30.5-<61.0 cm gbh). A total of 636 taxa were reduced to 381 for analysis, removing those of very low density and plot frequency.

Three groups of plots were identified: forest at low elevation, and generally coastal, on deep humus podzols; forest at intermediate elevation on mostly red-yellow podzols with affinities to dipterocarp forest; and forest at high elevation on mostly peaty podzols. The first group was divisible into five subgroups along a drainage gradient, while the more poorly drained plots showing affinities to peatswamp forest. Forty to eighty of the taxa, depending on the criteria for selection, were sufficient to define a stable, reduced spatial structure of the data matrix. Two subgroups, both coastal on deep podzols, represent the extreme form of kerangas forest per se. A comparison of Agathis borneensis- and Shorea albida-dominated plots revealed few other associated and differentiating taxa.

Patterns were clearest from analyses of basal area data and of densities of all and small trees. Ordinations and grouping of plots for small, but not large, tree densities were similar to those for basal area. Different species were differentiated on the basis of the abundance measure, leading to group (tabular) definition of associations in a dual manner. A new system of summarization is presented which combines basal area, density and frequency in a graded hierarchical approach.

The association between vegetation and soil type was difficult to unravel because of the limited environmental space sampled. Soil type was confounded with elevation, rainfall and geographical location. A major factor is clay content probably affecting nutrient status and water holding properties. ‘Modal analysis’ of small tree densities showed clearest patterns in this respect. There were no patterns at the family or genus level, nor in leaf size spectra within kerangas.

Problems in the treatment, analysis and summarization of tropical forest data sets are discussed. These problems centre on the scale and intensity of field sampling and the advantages of measuring small trees leading to a dual basal area and density approach. All published studies, including this one, within kerangas forest have used inadequate sampling for the purposes of revealing species changes with respect to soil type and composition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, I. 1989. Mycorrhizas in tropical forests. In: Proctor, J. (ed.) Mineral nutrients in tropical forest and savanna ecosystems. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, P. S. 1964. Ecological studies in the mixed dipterocarp forests of the Brunei state. Oxf. For. Mem. 25.

  • Austin, M. P. & Greig-Smith, P. 1968. The application of quantitative methods to vegetation survey. II. Some methodological problems of data from rain forest. J. Ecol. 56: 827–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, M. P., Ashton, P. S. & Greig-Smith, P. 1972. The application of quantitative methods to vegetation survey. III. A re-examination of rain forest data from Brunei. J. Ecol. 60: 305–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillie, I. C. 1976. Further studies on drought in Sarawak. J. Trop. Geog. 43: 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beals, E. W. 1973. Ordination: mathematical elegance or ecological naivité. J. Ecol. 61: 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beals, E. W. 1984. Bray-Curtis ordination: an effective strategy for analysis of multivariate ecological data. Adv. Ecol. Res. 14: 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, F. G. 1952. The kerangas lands of Sarawak. Malay. For. 15: 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brünig, E. F. 1968. Der Heidewald von Sarawak und Brunei. 041 Mitteil. Bundesforschungsanst. Forst-u. Holzwirtsch. No 68. Band I + II. Wiedebusch, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brünig, E. F. 1971. On the ecological significance of drought in the equatorial wet evergreen (rain)forest of Sarawak (Borneo). Trans. 2nd Aberdeen-Hull Symp.; Hull Dept. Geogr., Misc. Ser. 11: 66–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brünig, E. F. 1974. Ecological studies in the kerangas forests of Sarawak and Brunei. Borneo Lit. Bur. for Sarawak For. Dep., Kuching, Sarawak.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. E. D. 1973. A handbook to Kabili-Sepilok forest reserve. Sabah For. Rec. No. 9, Sabah For. Dep., Sandakan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartlan, J. S., Newbery, D. McC., Thomas, D. W. & Waterman, P. G. 1986. The influence of topography and soil phosphorus on the vegetation of Korup Forest Reserve, Cameroun. Vegetatio 65: 131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H. G. 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H. G., Whittaker, R. H. & Wentworth, T. R. 1977. A comparative study of reciprocal averaging and other ordination techniques. J. Ecol. 65: 157–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith, P. 1971. Application of numerical methods to tropical forests. In: Patil, G. P., Pielou, E. C. & Waters, W. E. (eds), Many species populations, ecosystems and systems analysis. Statistical Ecology Vol. 3: 195–204.

  • Greig-Smith, P. 1983. Quantitative plant ecology. 3rd ed. Blackwell Scientific Publ., Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith, P., Austin, M. P. & Whitmore, T. C. 1967. The application of quantitative methods to vegetation survey. I. Association analysis and principal components ordination of rain forest. J. Ecol. 55: 483–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, J. L. & Smith, S. E. 1983. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. O. 1988. How effective is ordination as a means of relating vegetation to ecological factors? Bull. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belg. 121: 134–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kartawinata, K. 1978. The ‘kerangas’ heath forest in Indonesia. In: Singh, J. S. & Gopal, B. (eds), Glimpses of ecology, pp. 145–153, Int. Sci. Publ., Jaipur, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kartawinata, K. 1980. A note on a kerangas (heath) forest at Sobulu, East Kalimantan. Reinwardtia 9: 429–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Dombois, D. & Ellenberg, H. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbery, D. McC., Gartlan, J. S., McKey, D. B. & Waterman, P. G. 1986a. The influence of drainage and soil phosphorus on the vegetation of Douala-Edea Forest Reserve, Cameroun. Vegetatio 65: 149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbery, D. McC. & Proctor, J. 1984. Ecological studies in four contrasting lowland rain forests in Gunung Mulu National Park, Sarawak. IV. Associations between tree distribution and soil factors. J. Ecol. 72: 475–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbery, D. McC., Renshaw, E. & Brünig, E. F. 1986b. Spatial pattern of trees in kerangas forest, Sarawak. Vegetatio 65: 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir, I. 1973. Data transformations in ecological ordination. I. Some advantages of non-centering. J. Ecol. 61: 329–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir, I., Walker, D. & Williams, W. T. 1975. Data transformations in ecological ordination. II. On the meaning of data standardization. J. Ecol. 63: 779–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orloci, L. 1978. Multivariate analysis in vegetation research. 2nd. ed. Junk, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet, R. K. 1980. Ordination as a tool for analysing complex data sets. Vegetatio 42: 171–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, J., Anderson, J. M., Chai, P. & Vallack, H. W. 1983. Ecological studies in four contrasting rain forests in Gunung Mulu National Park, Sarawak. I. Forest environment, structure and floristics. J. Ecol. 71: 237–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P. W. 1936. Ecological observations on the rain forest of Mount Dulit, Sarawak. Part I. J. Ecol. 24: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P. W. 1965. Soil conditions in some Bornean lowland plant communities. Proc. of a Symposium on ecological research in humid tropical vegetation, Kuching, Sarawak. UNESCO/Sarawak Government.

  • Riswan, S. 1982. Ecological studies on primary, secondary and experimentally mixed dipterocarp forest and kerangas forest in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Doctoral Thesis, Aberdeen Univ.

  • TerBraak, C. J. F. 1987. CANOCO— A FORTRAN programme for canonical community ordination by correspondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy analysis (vers. 2.1). TNO Institute of Applied Computer Science, Wageningen, Neths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, T. C. 1984. Tropical rain forests of the Far East. 2nd ed. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, T. C. 1989. South east Asian tropical forests. In: Leith, H. & Werger, M. J. A. (eds), Tropical rain forest ecosystems: 195–218. Elsevier Sci. Publ., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Newbery, D.M. Floristic variation within kerangas (heath) forest: re-evaluation of data from Sarawak and Brunei. Vegetatio 96, 43–86 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00031653

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00031653

Keywords

Navigation