Abstract
The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to compare the self-reported prevalence of chronic conditions when respondents are simply asked to list all chronic conditions (recall method) versus when respondents are asked explicitly about the presence of specific conditions (recognition method). Using data from two Canadian population surveys, 17 separate logistic regression models were used to estimate the effect of method on the odds of reporting any chronic condition, and each of 16 specific conditions. Respondents exposed to the recognition method were nearly four times more likely to report any chronic condition than those exposed to the recall method. The effect of method varied widely across conditions, with those exposed to the recognition method 25 times more likely to report urinary incontinence, but only 1.3 times more likely to report diabetes, compared to those exposed to the recall method. In short, the estimates of chronic conditions obtained using the recall method will be different from those gathered via the recognition method, and the extent of this difference will vary by condition. Both survey designers and survey analysts must make the decision of which method is appropriate, given the goals of the survey or analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blaxter, Mildred: Health and Lifestyles. Routledge, New York (1990)
Cartwright, Ann: Some problems in the collection and analysis of morbidity data obtained from sample surveys. Milbank Meml. Fund Q. 37, 33–48 (1959)
Denton, Frank T., Spencer, B.G.: Chronic health conditions: changing prevalence in an aging population and some implications for the delivery of health care services. Can. J. Aging 29, 11–21 (2010)
Fortune, Gillian, Barrowclough, C., Lobban, F.: Illness representations in depression. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 43, 347–364 (2004)
Foster, Nadine E., Bishop, A., Thomas, E., Main, C., Horne, R., Weinman, J., et al.: Illness perceptions of low back pain patients in primary care: what are they, do they change and are they associated with outcome? Pain 136, 177–187 (2008)
Hale, Elizabeth D., Treharne, G.J., Kitas, G.D.: The common-sense model of self-regulation of health and illness: how can we use it to understand and respond to our patients’ needs? Rheumatology 46, 904–906 (2007)
Halm, Ethan A., Mora, P., Leventhal, H.: No symptoms, no asthma: the acute episodic disease belief is associated with poor self-management among inner-city adults with persistent asthma. Chest 129, 573–580 (2006)
Knight, Marian, Stewart-Brown, S., Fletcher, L.: Estimating health needs: the impact of a checklist of conditions and quality of life measurement on health information derived from community surveys. J. Public Health Med. 23, 179–186 (2001)
Leventhal, Howard, Leventhal, E., Contrada, R.: Self-regulation, health, and behavior: a perceptual-cognitive approach. Psychol. Health 13, 717–733 (2011)
National Center for Health Statistics, Jabine, Thomas.: Reporting chronic conditions in the National Health Interview Survey. A review of tendencies from evaluation studeis and methodological test. (Rep. No. 2) (1987)
Nisselson, Harold, Woolsey, T.: Some problems of the household interview design for the national health survey. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 54, 69–87 (1959)
Paganini-Hill, Annlia, Chao, A.: Accuracy of recall of hip fracture, heart attack, and cancer: a comparison of postal survey data and medical records. Am. J. Epidemiol. 138, 101–106 (1993)
Statistics Canada: Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS). Annual Component, user guide 2007–08 microdata files. Statistics Canada, Ottawa, ON (2009a)
Statistics Canada: General Social Survey. Cycle 21: Family, social support and retirement—Public use microdata file documentation and user’s guide. Statistics Canada, Ottawa, ON (2009b)
Tourangeau, Roger, Rips, L., Rasinski, K.: The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
Wu, S.C., Li, C.Y., Ke, D.S.: The agreement between self-reporting and clinical diagnosis for selected medical conditions among the elderly in Taiwan. Public Health 114, 137–142 (2000)
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a WorkSafeBC Research at Work grant (grant number RS2009-OG03) to PS. In addition, Peter Smith is supported by a New Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the Toronto Region Statistics Canada Research Data Center provided access to the data used for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A: questions used to solicit self-reports of medically diagnosed chronic conditions in the general social survey and the Canadian community health surveys
Appendix A: questions used to solicit self-reports of medically diagnosed chronic conditions in the general social survey and the Canadian community health surveys
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bielecky, A., Smith, P.M. Methods of soliciting self-reported chronic conditions in population surveys: don’t ask, don’t report?. Qual Quant 48, 2463–2477 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9901-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9901-x