Abstract
For temporal relations, mutually entailed relations are different to those directly trained; we learn that A occurred “before” B and derive that B occurred “after” A. Deriving such relations results in lower accuracy and slower response speeds compared to derived relations identical to those trained. The ability of an individual to derive relations different to those trained is a measure of relational flexibility and predicts performance on standard cognitive tests. In the current study, 23 younger (M = 19 years) and 23 older (M = 61 years) participants observed pairs of stimuli presented consecutively (A … B) and then evaluated statements including the stimuli in the same (A BEFORE B) or reversed order (B AFTER A). Judgements on reversed (“after”) statements resulted in lower accuracy and slower response speeds than those presented in the same order (“before”) for both older and younger groups. Older adults exhibited deficits in relational flexibility compared to younger adults, such as slower progression through experimental phases, particularly in correctly responding to reversed statements. Older participants also demonstrated higher error rates on foil statements and responded more slowly than younger participants. The findings suggest that older adults may benefit from training strategies focused on relational flexibility.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnes, D., McCullagh, P. D., & Keenan, M. (1989). Equivalence class formation in non-hearing impaired children and hearing impaired children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 19–30.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 (R Package Version 1.1-8). Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.
Cassidy, S., Roche, B., & Hayes, S. C. (2011). A relational frame training intervention to raise intelligence quotients: A pilot study. The Psychological Record, 61(2), 173–198.
Chalfonte, B. L., & Johnson, M. K. (1996). Feature memory and binding in young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 24(4), 403–416. doi:10.3758/BF03200930.
Daniels, K., Toth, J., & Jaccoby, L. (2006). The aging of executive functions. In E. Bialystok & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Lifespan cognition: Mechanisms of change (pp. 96–111). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Devany, J. M., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language‐able and language‐disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46(3), 243–257. doi:10.1901/jeab.1986.46-243.
DuBrow, S., & Davachi, L. (2014). Temporal memory is shaped by encoding stability and intervening item reactivation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34(42), 13998–14005. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2535-14.2014.
Fisher, D. L., & Glaser, R. A. (1996). Molar and latent models of cognitive slowing: Implications for aging, dementia, depression, development, and intelligence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 458–480.
Gore, N. G., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Murphy, G. (2010). The relationship between intellectual functioning and relational perspective-taking. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 10(1), 1–17.
Hartman, M., & Warren, L. H. (2005). Explaining age differences in temporal working memory. Psychology and Aging, 20(4), 645–656. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.20.4.645.
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Homes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/ Plenum.
Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65(1), 185–241. doi:10.1901/jeab.1996.65-185.
Hyland, J. M., O’Hora, D., Leslie, J. C., & Smyth, S. (2009). The effect of reversal on reproduction of observed temporal sequences. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Cognitive Science Annual Conference.
Hyland, J. M., O’Hora, D. P., Leslie, J. C., & Smyth, S. (2012). Sequential responding in accordance with temporal relational cues: A comparison of ‘before’ and ‘after’. The Psychological Record, 62, 463–484.
Hyland, J. M., Smyth, S., O’Hora, D. P., & Leslie, J. C. (2014). The effect of before and after instructions on the speed of sequential responding. The Psychological Record, 64, 311–319. doi:10.1007/s40732-014-0026-y.
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., & Gopher, D. (1999). Task coordination and aging: Explorations of executive control processes in the task switching paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 101(2), 339–378. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00011-6.
Li, K. Z., Lindenberger, U., Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2001). Walking while memorizing: Age-related differences in compensatory behavior. Psychological Science, 12(3), 230–237. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00341.
Li, S. C., Lindenberger, U., Hommel, B., Aschersleben, G., Prinz, W., & Baltes, P. B. (2004). Transformations in the couplings among intellectual abilities and constituent cognitive processes across the life span. Psychological Science, 15, 155–163. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.01503003.
Lindenberger, U., & Baltes, P. B. (1994). Sensory functioning and intelligence in old age: A strong connection. Psychological Aging, 9(3), 339–355. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.9.3.339.
Lipkens, G., Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1993). Longitudinal study of derived stimulus relations in an infant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 201–239.
Logie, R. H., & Morris, R. G. (2014). Working memory and ageing. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Marshuetz, C., Smith, E. E., Jonides, J., DeGutis, J., & Chenevert, T. L. (2000). Order information in working memory: FMRI evidence for parietal and prefrontal mechanisms. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(Suppl. 2), 130–144. doi:10.1162/08989290051137459.
McDowd, J. M., & Craik, F. I. (1988). Effects of aging and task difficulty on divided attention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(2), 267–280. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.14.2.267.
McDowd, J. M., & Shaw, R. J. (2000). Attention and aging: A functional perspective. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 221–292). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
McGill, R., Tukey, J. W., & Larsen, W. A. (1978). Variations of box plots. The American Statistician, 32(1), 12–16.
Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2000). Adult age differences in memory performance: Tests of an associative deficit hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1170–1187. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1170.
O’Hora, D., Roche, B., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (2002). Response latencies to multiple derived stimulus relations: Testing two predictions of relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 52, 51–76.
O’Hora, D., Peláez, M., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2005). Derived relational responding and performance on verbal subtests of the WAIS-III. The Psychological Record, 55, 155–175.
O’Hora, D., Peláez, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., Rae, G., Robinson, K., & Chaudhary, T. (2008). Temporal relations and intelligence: Correlating relational performance with performance on the WAIS-III. The Psychological Record, 58, 569–584.
O’Toole, C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2009). Three chronometric indices of relational responding as predictors of performance on a brief intelligence test: The importance of relational flexibility. The Psychological Record, 59, 119–132.
Park, D., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (2000). Cognitive aging: A primer. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/.
Roberts, J. M., Ly, M., Murray, E., & Yassa, M. A. (2014). Temporal discrimination deficits as a function of lag interference in older adults. Hippocampus, 24(10), 1189–1196.
Rodríguez-Villagra, O. A., Göthe, K., Oberauer, K., & Kliegl, R. (2013). Working memory capacity in a go/no-go task: Age differences in interference, processing speed, and attentional control. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1683–1696. doi:10.1037/a0030883.
Rotblatt, L. J., Sumida, C. A., Van Etten, E. J., Turk, E. P., Tolentino, J. C., & Gilbert, P. E. (2015). Differences in temporal order memory among young, middle-aged, and older adults may depend on the level of interference. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 7, 28.
Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.403.
Salthouse, T. A. (2009). When does age-related cognitive decline begin? Neurobiology of Aging, 30(4), 507–514. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.09.023.
Schneider, J. M., Gopinath, B., McMahon, C. M., Leeder, S. R., Mitchell, P., & Wang, J. J. (2011). Dual sensory impairment in older age. Journal of Aging and Health, 23(8), 1309–1324. doi:10.1177/0898264311408418.
Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5–13. doi:10.1044/jshr.1401.05.
Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative.
Singmann, H., Bolker, B., & Westfall, J. (2015). Afex: Analysis of factorial experiments (R Package Version 0.13-145). Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afex.
Steele, D. L., & Hayes, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519–555. doi:10.1901/jeab.1991.56-519.
Steingrimsdottir, H. S., & Arntzen, E. (2014). Performance by older adults on identity and arbitrary matching-to-sample tasks. The Psychological Record, 64, 1–13. doi:10.1007/s40732-014-0053-8.
Verhaeghen, P., Steitz, D. W., Sliwinski, M. J., & Cerella, J. (2003). Aging and dual-task performance: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18(3), 443–460. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.18.3.443.
Viskontas, I. V., Morrison, R. G., Holyoak, K. J., Hummel, J. E., & Knowlton, B. J. (2004). Relational integration, inhibition, and analogical reasoning in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 19, 581–591. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.19.4.581.
Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Whelan, R. (2008). Effective analysis of reaction time data. The Psychological Record, 58(3), 475–482.
Wickham, H. (2009). ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McGreal, C., Hyland, J., O’ Hora, D. et al. Mutual Entailment of Temporal Relations in Younger and Older Adults: Reversing Order Judgments. Psychol Rec 66, 419–428 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0182-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0182-3