Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Exchange of Natural Enemies for Biological Control: Is it a Rocky Road?—The Road in the Euro-Mediterranean Region and the South American Common Market

  • Forum
  • Published:
Neotropical Entomology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The access and benefit sharing (ABS) regulations from the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) for the use of natural resources became an important issue because the biodiversity of developing countries was heavily accessed and unilaterally exploited by pharmaceutical and seed companies. However, natural enemies used for biological control are living and unmodified genetic resources which cannot be patented and have been treated as resources such as drugs, seeds, or other commercial products. Consequently, the ABS requirements have limited not only the use of natural enemies but also the positive effects that scientifically supported biological control strategies have on the society, the environment, and the economy, reducing problems of pesticide residues, water and soil contamination, and non-target effects. During the last several years, the biological control scientific community has faced new and extremely complicated legislation dictated by a high and diverse number of governmental agencies at different levels, making the access to natural resources for biocontrol purposes a rocky road. Society at large should be aware of how the strict ABS regulations affect the use of natural enemies as biological resources to secure food production, food safety, and global environmental protection. We discuss in here the current difficulties derived from CBD for the exchange of natural enemies taking as example the Euro-Mediterranean region, Argentina, and Brazil to demonstrate how long and diverse are the steps to be followed to obtain the required permits for access and exportation/importation of natural enemies. We then argue that the public visibility of biocontrol strategies should be increased and their benefits highlighted in order to persuade legislators for the development of a less bureaucratic, more expedient, and more centralized regulatory frame, greatly favoring the practice and benefits of biological control. We finally propose a general framework in which ABS issues should be dealt in ways to attend the CBD, but also to make the use of natural resources for the biological control of pests to secure food production and security a possible alternative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babendreier D, Bigler F, Kuhlmann U (2006) Current status and constraints in the assessment of non-target effects. In: Bigler F, Babendreier D, Kuhlmann U (eds) Environmental impact of invertebrates for biological control of arthropods: methods and risk assessment. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 1–4, 299p

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beckage NE, Gelman DB (2004) Wasp parasitoid disruption of host development: implications for new biologically based strategies for insect control. Annu Rev Entomol 49:299–330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bigler F, Babendreier D, Kuhlmann U (2006) Environmental impact of invertebrates for biological control of arthropods: methods and risk assessment. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, p 299

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • CBD–Convention on Biological Diversity (2011a) Nagoya Protocol. Available at: <www.cbd.int/abs/>. Accessed 03 Mar 2011

  • CBD–Convention on Biological Diversity (2011b) Nagoya Protocol. Available at: <www.cbd.int/abs/text/articles/?sec=abs-06>. Accessed 03 Mar 2011

  • CBD–Convention on Biological Diversity (2011c) Nagoya Protocol. Available at: <www.cbd.int/abs/text/articles/?sec=abs-08>. Accessed 03 Mar 2011

  • Caltagirone LE, Doutt RL (1989) The history of the Vedalia beetle importation to California and its impact on the development of biological control. Annu Rev Entomol 34:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center TD, Hill MP, Cordo HA, Julien MH (2002) Waterhyacinth. In: Van Driesche RGB, Blossey B, Hoddle M, Lyon S, Reardon R (eds) Biological control of invasive plants in the eastern United States. USDA-FS, Morgantown, pp 41–64, 413p

  • Cock MJW, van Lenteren JC, Brodeur J, Barratt B, Bigler F, Bolckmans K, Cônsoli FL, Haas F, Mason PG, Parra JRP (2009) The use and exchange of biological control agents for food and agriculture. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Background Study Paper No. 47. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Cock MJW, van Lenteren JC, Brodeur J, Barratt BIP, Bigler F, Bolckmans K, Cônsoli FL, Haas F, Mason PG, Parra JRP (2010) Do new access and benefit sharing procedures under the Convention on Biological Diversity threaten the future of Biological Control? BioControl 55:199–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correa CM (2005) Do national access regimes promote the use of genetic resources and benefit sharing? Int J Environ Sustain Dev 4:444–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulson JR, Zapater MC (1991) Opportunities for implementation of Biocontrol in Latin America. Proc. IOBC, Río de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Coutinot D (2006) A risk assessment before the introduction of biological control agent? Proceedings of the 1st French Association for Plant Protection (AFPP) Conference of parks, gardens, lawns, forests, water and other non-agricultural areas, pp. 343–350

  • Coutinot D (2010) International, Regional, European disposals relative to biological control. Proceedings of the 7th Congress of the Moroccan Association of Plant Protection, pp. 501–508

  • Coutinot D, Ehret P, Theissen G (2005) Importation of exotic organisms. Legislation and regulations in the EU and in France (EU). Proceedings of the International Workshop Invasive Plants in the Mediterranean Type Regions of the World, pp. 98–104

  • Coutinot D, Taleb A, Arahou M, Bon M-C, Matocq A (2010) Explorations in Morocco for the discovery of the genus Peristenus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) for a biological control program in North America. Proceedings of the 7th Moroccan Association of Plant Protection, pp. 537–543.

  • Coutinot D, Ehret P, Langlet X (2011) Imports of living organisms for scientific purposes: recent development in France (EU). Proceedings of 9th AFPP International Conference on Pests in Agriculture, p. 10

  • de Sá LAN, de Nardo EAB, Tambasco FJ (2002) Quarentena de agentes de controle biológico. In: Parra JRP, Botelho PSM, Corrêa-Ferreira BS, Bento JMS (eds) Controle Biológico no Brasil: Parasitóides e Predadores. Editora Manole, São Paulo, pp 43–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Delfosse ES (2005) Risk and ethics in biological control. Biol Control 35:319–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diversitas (2011) International program of biodiversity science. Available at http://www.diversitas-international.org/. Accessed 03 Apr 2011.

  • Duffy R (2010) Nature crime: how we’re getting conservation wrong. Yale University Press, New Haven, p 288

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers RU (2011) Regulation of biological control agents. Springer, Dordrecht, p 416

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • EPPO (1999) PM 6/1(1) - First import of exotic biological control agents for research under contained conditions. Available at: http://archives.eppo.org/EPPOStandards/PM6_BIOCONTL/pm6-01-e.doc. Accessed 03 Apr 2011

  • EPPO (2010a) PM 6/2(2) - Import and release of exotic biological control agents. Available at: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.2010.02405.x>. Accessed 03 Apr 2011

  • EPPO (2010b) PM 6/3(4) - List of biological control agents widely used in the EPPO region. Available at: http://archives.eppo.org/EPPOStandards/biocontrol.htm. Accessed 03 Apr 2011

  • FAO (2006) International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures. Publication no. 3. «Guidelines for export, shipment, import and release of biological control agents and other beneficial organisms». Secretariat of the International Plant Protection Convention, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 21p. Available at : <https://www.ippc.int/file_uploaded/1146657660135_ISPM3.pdf>. Accessed 12 Jul 2011

  • FAPESP (2001) Biota. Available at: <www.fapesp.br/en/materia/4662/biota/biota.htm> Accessed 03 Mar 2011

  • Guillon M (2004) Current world situation on acceptance and marketing of biological control agents (BCAs). International Biocontrol Manufacturers Association. Available at: <http://www.ibmaglobal.org/IBMA_Public_Positions/20041028_Presentation_BCAs_Thailand_Indonesia_Cuba.pdf>. Accessed 15 Jun 2011

  • Harrop SR, Pritchard DJ (2011) A hard instrument goes soft: the implications of the convention on biological diversity’s current trajectory. Glob Environ Chang 21:474–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes R, Grossman (2006) A scientist’s guide to talking with the media: practical advice from the Union of Concerned Scientists. Rutgers University Press, Piscataway, p 181

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy M (2000) Transgenic arthropods for pest management programs: risks and realities. Exp Appl Acarol 24:463–495

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ibisch PL (2005) Access and benefit-sharing regulations in Bolivia: consequences for research and biodiversity conservation. In: Feit U, von den Driesch M, Lobin W (eds) Access and benefit-sharing of genetic resources. Ways and means for facilitating biodiversity research and conservation while safeguarding ABS provisions. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Bonn, pp 65–73, 125p

    Google Scholar 

  • IPPC (2005) International Plant Protection Convention. Available at https://www.ippc.int/ Accessed 17 July 2011

  • Jetter K, Paine TD (2004) Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for biological control in the urban landscape. Biological Contr 30:312–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joly CA, Rodrigues RR, Metzger JP, Haddad CFB, Verdade LM, Oliveira MC, Bolzani VS (2010) Biodiversity conservation research, training, and policy in São Paulo. Science 328:1358–1359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson M, Wratten SD, Landis DA, Gurr GM (eds) (2008) Conservation biological control—special issue. Biol Control 45:171–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien MH, Griffiths MW (eds) (1998) Biological Control of Weeds: a world catalogue of agents and their target weeds. 4th edn. CABI Publishing. 223 pp

  • Kogan M (1998) Integrated pest management: historical perspectives and contemporary development. Ann Rev Entomol 43:243–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leppla NC, Williams DW (1992) Mass rearing beneficial insects and the renaissance of biological control. Pesq Agropec Bras 27:231–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinez SI, Biber-Klemm S (2010) Scientists—take action for access to biodiversity. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2:27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parra JRP (2006) A prática do Controle Biológico de Pragas no Brasil. In Pinto AS, Nava DE, Rossi MM, Malerbo-Souza DT (eds), Controle Biológico de Pragas na Prática. Piracicaba, CP2. 287p

  • Parra JRP (2008) Mass rearing of natural enemies. In: Capinera JL (ed) Encyclopedia of entomology, 2nd edn. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 2301–2305

    Google Scholar 

  • Parra JRP (2010) Mass rearing of egg parasitoids for Biological Control Programs. In: Cônsoli FL, Parra JRP, Zucchi RA (eds) Egg parasitoids in agroecosystems with emphasis on Trichogramma. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 267–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Parra JRP, Botelho PSM, Corrêa-Ferreira BS, Bento JMS (2002) Controle Biológico no Brasil—parasitóides e predadores. Ed. Manole, São Paulo, p 609

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson DE, Callaway RM (2003) Indirect effects of host-specific biological control agents. Trends Ecol Evol 18:456–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peña-Neira S, Dieperink C, Addink H (2002) Equitably sharing benefits from the utilization of natural genetic resources: The Brazilian Interpretation of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Electronic Journal of Comparative Law 6.3 (October). Available at : <www.ejcl.org/63/abs63-2.html>. Accessed 03 Mar 2011

  • Sá LAN de, Oliveira MRV (2006) Perspectivas do controle biológico de pragas no Brasil, pp. 255–287. In Pinto AS, Nava DE, Rossi MM, Malerbo-Souza DT (eds), Controle Biológico de Pragas: na prática. Piracicaba, CP2. 287p

  • Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2000) Sustaining life on earth: how the convention on biological diversity promotes nature and human well-being. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Montreal, Canada.

  • Thomas MB, Casula P, Wilby A (2004) Biological control and indirect effects. Trends Ecol Evol 19:62–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Lenteren JC (2003) Commercial availability of biological control agents. In: van Lenteren JC (ed) Quality control and production of biological control agents: theory and testing procedures. CABI Publishing, Wallingford

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Lenteren JC (2012) The state of commercial augmentative biological control: plenty of natural enemies, but a frustrating lack of uptake. BioControl 57:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Lenteren JC, Babendreier D, Bigler F, Burgio G, Hokkanen HMT, van Rijn PCJ, Thomas MB, Tommasini MG, Zeng QQ (2003) Environmental risk assessment of exotic natural enemies used in inundative biological control. BioControl 48:3–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasconcelos de, RM (2011) Exportação e importação dematerial biologico para fins de pesquisa. Brasilia, DF. Embrapa. 75p

  • Vélez E (2010) Brazil’s practical experience with access and benifit sharing and the protection of traditional knowledge. ICTSD Project on Genetic Resources, Policy Brief 8. International Centre for Trade abd Sustainable Development. 8p

  • Waage J (1997) Global developments in biological control and the implications for Europe. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 27:5–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner KD, Getz C (2008) A socio-economic analysis of the North American commercial natural enemy industry and implications for augmentative biological control. Biol Contr 45:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner KD, McNeil JN, Getz C (2007) What every biocontrol researcher should know about the public. In: Julien MH, Sforza R, Bon MC, Evans HC, Hatcher PE, Hinz HL, Rector BG (eds) Proceedings of the XII international symposium on biological control of weeds. CAB Internacional, Wallingford, pp 390–395, 744p

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellings PW (1996) The role of public policy in biological control: some global trends. Entomophaga 41:435–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WTO (1994) Marrakesh Agreements (GATT General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, TBT Barriers to Trade, SPM Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, AA Agreement on Agriculture, TRIPS Agreement on Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights). Available at: <http://www.wto.org>. Accessed 01 Feb 2011.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. European Biological Control Laboratory (USDA-ARS), Campus International de Baillarguet, CS 90013-Montferrier-sur-Lez 34988 St., Montferrier-sur-Lez, France

    D Coutinot

  2. Fundación para el Estudio de Especies Invasivas (FuEDEI), Hurlingham, Argentina

    J Briano

  3. Depto de Entomologia e Acarologia, ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, SP, Brasil

    J R P Parra & F L Cônsoli

  4. Lab de Quarentena “Costa Lima”, Embrapa Meio Ambiente, Jaguariúna, SP, Brasil

    L A N DE Sá

Authors
  1. D Coutinot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J Briano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J R P Parra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. L A N DE Sá
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F L Cônsoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D Coutinot.

Additional information

Invited Paper

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coutinot, D., Briano, J., Parra, J.R.P. et al. Exchange of Natural Enemies for Biological Control: Is it a Rocky Road?—The Road in the Euro-Mediterranean Region and the South American Common Market. Neotrop Entomol 42, 1–14 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-012-0103-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-012-0103-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation