Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

KARSYS: a pragmatic approach to karst hydrogeological system conceptualisation. Assessment of groundwater reserves and resources in Switzerland

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An approach is presented for the hydrogeological conceptualisation of karst systems. The KARSYS approach helps hydrogeologists working in karst regions to address in a pragmatic and efficient way the three following questions. (1) Where does the water of a karst spring come from? (2) Through which underground routes does it flow? (3) What are the groundwater reserves and where are they? It is based on a three dimensional model of the carbonate aquifer geometry (3D geological model) coupled to a series of simple fundamental principles of karst hydraulics. This provides, within a limited effort, a consistent hydrogeological conceptual model of karst flow systems within any investigation area. The level of detail can be adjusted according to the targeted degree of confidence. Two examples of its application are presented; the approach was first applied with a low level of detail on a national scale in order to assess the groundwater reserves in karst aquifers in Switzerland, suggesting a groundwater volume of 120 km3. On a regional scale, it was applied with a higher level of detail to some selected karst systems in order to assess their hydropower potential. The KARSYS approach may provide very useful information for water management improvement in karst regions (vulnerability assessment, impact assessment, water supply, flood hazards, landslides, etc.). It leads, in a very cost-effective manner, to a new and highly didactic representation of karst systems as well as to new concepts concerning the delineation of catchment areas in karst regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aubert D, Badoux H, Lavanchy Y (1979) La carte structurale et les sources du Jura vaudois. Bull Soc Vaud Sci Nat 74:333–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakalowicz M (2005) Karst groundwater: a challenge for new resources. J Hydrol 13:148–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Birk S, Lied LR, Sauter M (2002) Integrated approach to characterise the geometry of karst conduit systems at the catchment scale. 3rd International Conferrence on Water Resources and Environment Research, Dresden, pp 196–201

  • Birk S, Liedl R, Sauter M (2006) Karst spring responses examined by process-based modeling. Ground Water 44(6):832–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitterli T, Aviolat F, Brändli R, Christe R, Fracheboud S et al (2004) Groundwater resources. Hydrological atlas of Switzerland hades, Plate 8.6 (unpublished report) Federal Office for the Environment, Bern

  • Bögli A (1980) Karst hydrology and physical speleology. Julius Beltz, Hemsbach/Bergstrasse

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borghi A, Renard P, Mathieu G (2011) Inverse modeling of karstic networks using a pseudogenetic technique. Proceeding of the 9th Conference on Limestone Hydrogeology, Besançon, 1–4 September 2011, pp 67–70

  • Butscher C, Huggenberger P (2007) Implications for karst hydrology from 3D geological modeling using the aquifer base gradient approach. J Hydrol 342:184–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Criss R, Davisson L, Surbeck H, Winston W (2007) Isotopic methods. In: Drew D, Goldscheider N (eds) Methods in karst kydrogeology. International contribution to hydrogeology. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 123–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogwiler T, Wicks CM (2004) Sediment entrainment and transport in fluviokarst systems. J Hydrol 295:163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreybrodt W, Gabrovsek F, Romanov D (2005) Processes of speleogenesis: a modeling approach. ZRC Publishing, Ljubljana

    Google Scholar 

  • Falcone RA, Falgiani A, Parisse B, Petitta M, Spizzico M et al (2008) Chemical and isotopic (δ18O ‰, δ2H ‰, δ13C ‰, 222Rn) multi-tracing for groundwater conceptual model of carbonate aquifer (Gran Sasso INFN underground laboratory central Italy). J Hydrol 357:368–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farine J (1997) “NVELOPE” un logiciel de visualisation 3D intégrant la topographie souterraine et la géologie. Akt des 10. Natl Kongr Höhlenforschung, Breitenbach 1995, Schweiz, Stalact SSS/SGH Suppl 14, pp 423–431

  • Filipponi M, Schmassmann S, Jeannin PY, Parriaux A (2011) Karst-ALEA method a risk assessment method of karst for tunnel projects: application to the tunnel of Flims (GR, Switzerland). Proceeding of the 9th Conference on Limestone hydrogeology, Besançon, 1–4 September 2011, pp 181–184

  • Ford D, Williams P (2007) Karst hydrogeology and geomorphology. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Genthon P, Bataille A, Fromant A, D’Hulst D, Bourges F (2005) Temperature as a marker for karstic waters hydrodynamics. Inferences from 1 year recording at La Peyrére cave (Ariège, France). J Hydrol 311:157–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyer T, Birk S, Licha T, Liedl R, Sauter M (2007) Multi-tracer test approach to characterize reactive transport in karst aquifers. Ground Water 45(1):36–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg M, Palmer AN (2002) Delineation of source-water protection areas in karst aquifers of the ridge and valley and appalachian plateaus physiographic provinces: rules of thumb for estimating the capture zones of springs and wells (unpublished report), United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington

  • Goldscheider N, Drew D (2007) Methods in karst hydrogeology. International association of hydrogeology. Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasso A, Jeannin PY (2002) A global experimental system approach of karst springs hydrographs and chemographs. Ground Water 40(6):608–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasso A, Jeannin PY, Zwahlen F (2003) A deterministic approach to the coupled analysis of karsts springs’ hydrographs and chemographs. J Hydrol 271:65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grétillat PA (1992) Aquifères karstiques et poreux de l'Ajoie (JU, Suisse). Eléments pour la carte hydrogéologique au 1:25'000, vol. 1. PhD dissertation, Centre d'hydrogéologie de l'université de Neuchâtel, p 219

  • Hauns M, Jeannin PY, Atteia O (2001) Dispersion, retardation and scale effect in tracer breakthrough curves in karst conduits. J Hydrol 241:177–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herold T (1997) Räumliche Beziehungen der Karstsysteme zu den tektonisch-geologischen Strukturen im Gebiet der Weissenstein- und Farisbergantiklinale (Solothurner Jura). PhD dissertation, ETH Zurich

  • Hunkeler D, Mudry J (2007) Hydrochemical methods. In: Drew D, Goldscheider N (eds) Methods in karst hydrogeology. International contribution to hydrogeology. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 93–121

    Google Scholar 

  • ISSKA (2008) Abschätzung des Karstwasservolumens in der Schweiz. Schweiz-unveröffentlicher Bericht-Auftraggeber: Bundesamt für Umwelt (BAFU), Abteilung Natur und Landschaft, Schweizerisches Institut für Speläologie und Karstforschung, La Chaux-de-Fonds, p 20

  • Jakucs L (1959) Neue Methoden der Hoehlenforschung in Ungarn und ihre Ergebnisse. Die Höhle 10(4):88–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaquet O, Siegel P, Klubertanz G, Benabderrhamane H (2004) Stochastic discrete model of karstic networks. Adv Water Resour 27:751–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannin PY (1996) Structure et comportement hydraulique des aquifères karstiques. PhD dissertation, Univ Neuchâtel, p 237

  • Jeannin PY, Beuret S (1995) Multitraçage dans la région de Derborence. Cavernes 1:37–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannin PY, Heller P, Jordan F, Tissot N (2010a) Hydropower potential of karst groundwater in Vaud Canton (Switzerland). Proceedings of the International Congress and Exhibition on small hydropower, hidroenergia, Lausanne, 16–19 June 2010. http://www.swisskarst.ch/images/stories/Publi/jeannin_2010a.pdf

  • Jeannin PY, Heller P, Vouillamoz J, Jordan F (2010b) Cadastre Souterrain Vaudois. Potentiel Hydro-énergetique des zones karstiques. Rapport de synthèse. Schweiz rapport non publié mandant : SEVEN Service Environnement et Energie (VD) Institut Suisse de Spéléologie et de Karstologie, La Chaux-de-Fonds, p 48

  • Jozja N, Mondain P, Muet P (2011) Réflexion sur la fiabilité des traçages au regard des difficultés analytiques. Proceeding of the 9th Conference on Limestone Hydrogeology, Besançon, 1–4 September 2011, pp 249–252

  • Kiraly L (1973) Notice et carte hydrogéologique du canton de Neuchâtel. Bull Soc Neuchâtel Sci Nat 96:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiraly L (1978) La notion d’unité hydrogéologique dans le Jura (essai de définition). PhD dissertation, Université de Neuchâtel, p 115

  • Kovács A (2003) Geometry and hydraulic parameters of karst aquifers: a hydrodynamic modeling approach. PhD dissertation, Univ Neuchâtel, p 131

  • Kovács A, Perrochet P, Kiraly L, Jeannin PY (2005) A quantitative method for the characterisation of karst aquifers based on spring hydrograph analysis. J Hydrol 303:152–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuniansky EL (2011) Geological survey karst interest group Proc Fayetteville, Arkansas, April 26–29, 2011. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5031 p 212

  • Labat D, Ababou R, Mangin A (2000a) Rainfall-runoff relations for karstic springs. Part I: convolution and spectral analyses. J Hydrol 238(3):123–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labat D, Ababou R, Mangin A (2000b) Rainfall-runoff relations for karstic springs. Part II: continuous wavelet and discrete orthogonal multiresolution analyses. J Hydrol 238(3):149–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labat D, Mangin A, Ababou R (2002) Rainfall-runoff relations for karstic springs: multifractal analyses. J Hydrol 256(3–4):176–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long A, Putnam LD (2004) Linear model describing three components of flow in karst aquifers using 18O data. J Hydrol 296:254–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maillefert A, Jeannin PY (1991) La Glacière du Creux d’Enfer de Druchaux, Ballens VD. Stalact Soc Suisse Speleol 1/1991:3–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone B, Bellin A, Borsato A (2004) Runoff generation in karst catchments: multifractal analysis. J Hydrol 294:176–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malard A, Vouillamoz J, Weber E, Jeannin PY (2012) Swisskarst Project—toward a sustainable management of karst water in Switzerland. Application to the Bernese Jura. Act 13e Congr Natl Speleol, Muotathal, Suisse, 29 September–01 October 2012

  • Mangin A (1984) Pour une meilleure connaissance des systèmes hydrologiques partir des analyses corrélatoires et spectrales. J Hydrol 67:25–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariethoz G, Renard P (2011) Simulation of karstic networks using high order discrete Markov processes. Proceeding of the 9th Conference on Limestone Hydrogeology, Besançon, 1–4 september 2011, pp 323–326

  • Martin JB, White WB (2008) Frontiers of karst research. Proceedings and recommendations of the workshop, San Antonio, Texas, 3–5 May 2007 p 118

  • Palmer AN (1986) Prediction of contaminants paths in karst aquifers. Proceeding of the environmental problems in karst terranes and their solutions conference, Bowling Green, Kentucky, 28–30 October 1986, pp 32–53

  • Palmer AN (1989) Stratigraphic and structural control of cave development and groundwater flow in the mammoth cave region. In: White WB, White EL (eds) Karst hydrology, concepts from the mammoth cave area. Von Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 293–316

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Perrin J (2003) A conceptual model of flow and transport in a karst aquifer based on spatial and temporal variations of natural tracers. PhD dissertation, Univ Neuchâtel, p 227

  • Perrin J, Jeannin PY, Lavanchy Y (2000) Le bassin d’alimentation de la source karstique du Brassus: synthèse des essais de traçage. Geol Helv 93(1):93–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrin J, Jeannin PY, Cornaton F (2007) The role of tributary mixing in chemical variations at a karst spring, Milandre, Switzerland. J Hydrol 332:158–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson EW, Wicks CM (2006) Assessing the importance of conduit geometry and physical parameters in karst systems using the storm water management model (SWMM). J Hydrol 329:294–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinault J, Plagnes V, Aquilina L, Bakalowicz M (2001) Inverse modeling of the hydrological and the hydrochemical behavior of hydrosystems: characterization of karst system functioning. Water Resour 37(8):2191–2204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raeisi E, Groves C, Meiman J (2007) Effects of partial and full pipe flow on hydrochemographs of Logsdon river, Mammoth cave Kentucky USA. J Hydrol 337:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravbar N, Engelhardt I, Goldscheider N (2011) Anomalous behaviour of specific electrical conductivity at a karst spring induced by variable catchment boundaries: the case of the Podstenjšek spring, Slovenia. Hydrol Proc 25(13):2130–2140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schürch M, Kozel R, Pasquier F (2006) Observation of groundwater resources in Switzerland—example of the karst aquifer of the Areuse spring. Proceeding of the 8th Conference on Limestone Hydrogeology 2006, Neuchâtel Switzerland, pp 241–244

  • Spreafico M, Weingartner R (2005) The Hydrology of Switzerland. Selected aspects and results. Reports of the FOWG, Water Ser No 7

  • Sundqvist HS, Seibert J, Holmgren K (2007) Understanding conditions behind speleothem formation in Korallgrottan, northwestern Sweden. J Hydrol 347:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber E, Jordan F, Jeannin PY, Vouillamoz J, Eichenberger U et al (2011) Swisskarst project (NRP61): towards a pragmatic simulation of karst spring discharge with conceptual semi-distributed model. The Flims case study (Eastern Swiss Alps). Proceedings of the 9th Conference Limestone Hydrogeology, Besançon, 1–4 sep 2011, pp 483–486

  • Wildberger A, Preiswerk C (1997) Karst et grottes de suisse. Speleo Projects, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington SRH (1991) Karst Hydrogeology of the Canadian rocky mountain. PhD dissertation, Mc Master Univ Hamilton, Ontario, p 370

  • Worthington SRH, Ford DC (2009) Self-organized permeability in carbonate aquifers. Ground Water 47:326–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Jiang Y, Yuan D, Li L (2008) Modeling hydrological responses of karst spring to storm events: example of the Shuifang spring (Jinfo Mt., Chongqing, China). Environ Geol 55:1545–1553

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The development of the KARSYS approach would not have been possible without the support received from the Centre d’Hydrogéologie et de Géothermie (CHYN) of Neuchatel University and from colleagues at the Swiss Institute for Speleology and Karst Studies (SISKA). Part of the work was also supported by the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN), which in some ways was the inspiration for formulating our ideas. We want to thank these institutions for their fundamental contributions. We also want to thank the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) for encouraging the idea and for providing financial support for its application to all major karst systems in Switzerland in the framework of the NRP61 research programme. Finally, we acknowledge the authorities of several Swiss cantons (Vaud, Bern, Jura), who mandated us to apply our approach to the documentation of the karst systems in their territories.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P.-Y. Jeannin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeannin, PY., Eichenberger, U., Sinreich, M. et al. KARSYS: a pragmatic approach to karst hydrogeological system conceptualisation. Assessment of groundwater reserves and resources in Switzerland. Environ Earth Sci 69, 999–1013 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1983-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1983-6

Keywords

Navigation