Skip to main content
Log in

Safety and Tolerability of Tapentadol Extended Release in Moderate to Severe Chronic Osteoarthritis or Low Back Pain Management: Pooled Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

This analysis of pooled data from four randomized, controlled-dose adjustment, phase 3 studies (three 15-week, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled studies and a 1-year, open-label, active-controlled safety study) in patients with chronic osteoarthritis hip or knee pain or low back pain evaluated the safety and tolerability of tapentadol extended release (ER) for the management of moderate to severe, chronic pain.

Methods

In the three 15-week studies, patients were randomized (1:1:1) to twice-daily (bid) doses of placebo, tapentadol ER (100–250 mg), or oxycodone hydrochloride (HCl) controlled release (CR; 20–50 mg). In the 1-year safety study, patients were randomized (4:1) to tapentadol ER (100–250 mg bid) or oxycodone HCl CR (20–50 mg bid). Adverse events (AEs) and discontinuations were recorded in each study; pooled results were analyzed by treatment group.

Results

In the placebo (n = 993), tapentadol ER (n = 1,874), and oxycodone CR (n = 1,224) groups, respectively, 40.7%, 48.4%, and 62.3% of patients discontinued treatment prematurely and 58.7%, 79.0%, and 86.6% of patients experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent AE (TEAE). Incidences of gastrointestinal TEAEs in the placebo, tapentadol ER, and oxycodone CR groups, respectively, were 26.6%, 47.3%, and 65.4%; incidences of nervous system TEAEs were 22.5%, 42.6%, and 45.1%, respectively. Moderate or severe gastrointestinal TEAEs were reported for 10.9% of patients who received placebo, 25.3% of patients who received tapentadol ER, and 42.3% of patients who received oxycodone CR, and moderate or severe nervous system TEAEs were reported for 10.6%, 22.1%, and 25.2% of patients, respectively. In the placebo, tapentadol ER, and oxycodone CR groups, respectively, incidences of gastrointestinal TEAEs leading to study discontinuation were 2.1%, 8.3%, and 24.1%; incidences of nervous system TEAEs leading to discontinuation were 1.4%, 7.9%, and 16.3%, respectively.

Conclusion

Results from this large patient population showed that tapentadol ER (100–250 mg bid) had improved gastrointestinal tolerability compared with oxycodone CR, based on the overall incidence of gastrointestinal TEAEs, the incidence of moderate or severe gastrointestinal TEAEs, and the incidence of gastrointestinal TEAEs leading to discontinuation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johannes CB, Le TK, Zhou X, Johnston JA, Dworkin RH. The prevalence of chronic pain in United States adults: results of an internet-based survey. J Pain. 2010;11:1230–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Reid KJ, Harker J, Bala MM, et al. Epidemiology of chronic non-cancer pain in Europe: narrative review of prevalence, pain treatments and pain impact. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011;27:449–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Katz WA, Barkin RL. Dilemmas in chronic/persistent pain management. Am J Ther. 2008;15:256–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10:287–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Avouac J, Gossec L, Dougados M. Efficacy and safety of opioids for osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2007;15:957–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Furlan AD, Sandoval JA, Mailis-Gagnon A, Tunks E. Opioids for chronic noncancer pain: a meta-analysis of effectiveness and side effects. CMAJ. 2006;174:1589–94.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalso E, Edwards JE, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Opioids in chronic non-cancer pain: systematic review of efficacy and safety. Pain. 2004;112:372–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chou R, Ballantyne JC, Fanciullo GJ, Fine PG, Miaskowski C. Research gaps on use of opioids for chronic noncancer pain: findings from a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society and American Academy of Pain Medicine clinical practice guideline. J Pain. 2009;10:147–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Martell BA, O’Connor PG, Kerns RD, et al. Systematic review: opioid treatment for chronic back pain: prevalence, efficacy, and association with addiction. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:116–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Trescot AM, Helm S, Hansen H, et al. Opioids in the management of chronic non-cancer pain: an update of American Society of the Interventional Pain Physicians’ (ASIPP) Guidelines. Pain Physician. 2008;11:S5–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McNicol E, Horowicz-Mehler N, Fisk RA, et al. Management of opioid side effects in cancer-related and chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review. J Pain. 2003;4:231–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Christo PJ. Opioid effectiveness and side effects in chronic pain. Anesthesiol Clin N Am. 2003;21:699–713.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Prevalence of opioid adverse events in chronic non-malignant pain: systematic review of randomised trials of oral opioids. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7:R1046–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Trescot AM, Glaser SE, Hansen H, Benyamin R, Patel S, Manchikanti L. Effectiveness of opioids in the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain. Pain Physician. 2008;11:S181–200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Benyamin R, Trescot AM, Datta S, et al. Opioid complications and side effects. Pain Physician. 2008;11:S105–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tzschentke TM, Christoph T, Kögel B, et al. (-)-(1R,2R)-3-(3-Dimethylamino-1-ethyl-2-methyl-propyl)-phenol hydrochloride (tapentadol HCl): a novel m-opioid receptor agonist/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor with broad-spectrum analgesic properties. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007;323:265–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tzschentke TM, De Vry J, Terlinden R, et al. Tapentadol hydrochloride. Analgesic, mu-opioid receptor agonist, noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor. Drugs Future. 2006;31:1053–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lange B, Kuperwasser B, Okamoto A, et al. Efficacy and safety of tapentadol prolonged release for chronic osteoarthritis pain and low back pain. Adv Ther. 2010;27:381–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Afilalo M, Etropolski MS, Kuperwasser B, et al. Efficacy and safety of tapentadol extended release compared with oxycodone controlled release for the management of moderate to severe chronic pain related to osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled phase III study. Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30:489–505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Buynak R, Shapiro DY, Okamoto A, et al. Efficacy and safety of tapentadol extended release for the management of chronic low back pain: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled phase III study. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010;11:1787–804.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wild JE, Grond S, Kuperwasser B, et al. Long-term safety and tolerability of tapentadol extended release for the management of chronic low back pain or osteoarthritis pain. Pain Pract. 2010;10:416–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Buynak R, Shapiro DY, Okamoto A, et al. Erratum: efficacy and safety of tapentadol extended release for the management of chronic low back pain: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled phase III study. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010;11:2773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Slappendel R, Simpson K, Dubois D, Keininger DL. Validation of the PAC-SYM questionnaire for opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic low back pain. Eur J Pain. 2006;10:209–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wesson DR, Ling W. The Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS). J Psychoactive Drugs. 2003;35:253–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Handelsman L, Cochrane KJ, Aronson MJ, Ness R, Rubinstein KJ, Kanof PD. Two new rating scales for opiate withdrawal. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1987;13:293–308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Caldwell JR, Hale ME, Boyd RE, et al. Treatment of osteoarthritis pain with controlled release oxycodone or fixed combination oxycodone plus acetaminophen added to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: a double blind, randomized, multicenter, placebo controlled trial. J Rheumatol. 1999;26:862–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hale ME, Fleischmann R, Salzman R, et al. Efficacy and safety of controlled-release versus immediate-release oxycodone: randomized, double-blind evaluation in patients with chronic back pain. Clin J Pain. 1999;15:179–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Roth SH, Fleischmann RM, Burch FX, et al. Around-the-clock, controlled-release oxycodone therapy for osteoarthritis-related pain: placebo-controlled trial and long-term evaluation. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:853–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Friedmann N, Klutzaritz V, Webster L. Long-term safety of Remoxy® (extended-release oxycodone) in patients with moderate to severe chronic osteoarthritis or low back pain. Pain Med. 2011;12:755–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Swegle JM, Logemann C. Management of common opioid-induced adverse effects. Am Fam Physician. 2006;74:1347–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bell TJ, Panchal SJ, Miaskowski C, Bolge SC, Milanova T, Williamson R. The prevalence, severity, and impact of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction: results of a US and European Patient Survey (PROBE 1). Pain Med. 2009;10:35–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Panchal SJ, Muller-Schwefe P, Wurzelmann JI. Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction: prevalence, pathophysiology and burden. Int J Clin Pract. 2007;61:1181–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Sponsorship and article processing charges for this study were funded by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, (New Jersey, USA) and Grünenthal GmbH (Aachen, Germany). Medical writing assistance for this study was provided by Megan Knagge, PhD, of MedErgy (Pennsylvania, USA), and funded by Janssen Research & Development, LLC (New Jersey, USA). The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of Akiko Okamoto of Janssen Research & Development, LLC. All named authors meet the ICMJE criteria for authorship for this manuscript, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given final approval for the version to be published.

Conflict of interest

Mila Etropolski is an employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, and is a Johnson & Johnson stockholder. Christine Rauschkolb is an employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, and is a Johnson & Johnson stockholder. Brigitte Kuperwasser was an employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, at the time the work was performed and is a Johnson & Johnson stockholder. Thomas Häufel is an employee of Grünenthal GmbH. Bernd Lange is an employee of Grünenthal GmbH. Frank Laschewski is an employee of Grünenthal GmbH. Maren Flügel was an employee of Grünenthal GmbH at the time the work was performed.

Compliance with ethics guidelines

The analysis in this article is based on previously conducted studies, and does not involve any new studies of human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mila Etropolski.

Additional information

Trial Registration: NCT00421928, NCT00486811, NCT00449176, and NCT00361504.

Data in this manuscript were presented in part at the International Association for the Study of Pain’s 13th World Congress on Pain, August 29 to September 2, 2010, Montreal, Canada; at the British Pain Society’s 2010 Annual Scientific Meeting, April 13–16, 2010, Manchester, England; at the 14th World Society of Pain Clinicians Congress, October 28–31, 2010, Beijing, China; and at the 2010 National Conference on Pain for Frontline Practitioners (PAIN Week), September 8–11, 2010, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PPT 216 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Etropolski, M., Kuperwasser, B., Flügel, M. et al. Safety and Tolerability of Tapentadol Extended Release in Moderate to Severe Chronic Osteoarthritis or Low Back Pain Management: Pooled Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Adv Ther 31, 604–620 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-014-0128-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-014-0128-6

Keywords

Navigation