Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated whole-breast irradiation for early breast cancer patients: a single-institute study of 1,098 patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HF-WBI) compared with conventionally fractionated (CF) WBI.

Materials and methods

Patients with early breast cancer (stages 0–II and <3 positive lymph nodes) who had undergone breast-conserving surgery were eligible for the HF-WBI study. HF-WBI was administered at 43.2 Gy in 16 fractions over 3.2 weeks to the whole breast with an additional tumor-bed boost of 8.1 Gy in 3 fractions over 3 days for positive surgical margins or those <5 mm. CF-WBI was administered at 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks to the whole breast with an additional tumor-bed boost of 16 Gy in 8 fractions over 1.4 weeks to 6 Gy in 3 fractions over 3 days, depending on margin status.

Results

From April 1, 2006, to December 31, 2010, 717 patients were registered and 734 breasts were treated by HF-WBI. In the same period, 381 patients and 393 breasts who matched the study criteria chose CF-WBI, so the total number of patients in this comparison was 1,098. Grade 2 acute skin reactions were observed for 24 patients (3 %) in the HF-WBI group and 53 patients (14 %) in the CF-WBI (p < 0.001) group. The median follow-up period was 27 months. Two cases of intrabreast tumor recurrence were observed in each treatment group. Regional lymph node recurrence was observed in 1 HF-WBI patient and 2 CF-WBI patients.

Conclusion

HF-WBI is superior to CF-WBI in terms of acute skin reaction and has the same short-term efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;366(9503):2087–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith BD, Bentzen SM, Correa CR, et al. Fractionation for whole-breast irradiation: an American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) evidence-based guideline. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:59–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baillet F, Housset M, Maylin C, et al. The use of a specific hypofractionated radiation therapy regimen versus classical fractionation in the treatment of breast cancer: a randomized study of 230 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1990;19:1131–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wallace LM, Priestman SG, Dunn JA, et al. The quality of life of early breast cancer patients treated by two different radiotherapy regimens. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1993;5:228–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Whelan TJ, MacKenzie R, Julian J, et al. Randomized trial of breast irradiation schedules after lumpectomy for women with lymph node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1143–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Whelan TJ, Pignol JP, Levine MN, et al. Long-term results of hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:513–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yarnold J, Ashton A, Bliss J, et al. Fractionation sensitivity and dose response of late adverse effects in the breast after radiotherapy for early breast cancer: long-term results of a randomised trial. Radiother Oncol. 2005;75:9–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Owen JR, Ashton A, Bliss JM, et al. Effect of radiotherapy fraction size on tumour control in patients with early stage breast cancer after local tumour excision: long-term results of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:467–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bentzen SM, Agrawal RK, Aird EG, et al. The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trial A of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(4):331–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bentzen SM, Agrawal RK, Aird EG, et al. The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trial B of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2008;371:1098–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fowler JF. The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy. Br J Radiol. 1989;62:679–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Taher AN, El-Baradie MM, Essa H, et al. Hypofractionation versus conventional fractionation radiotherapy after conservative treatment of breast cancer: early skin reactions and cosmetic results. J Egypt Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;16:178–87.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Osako T, Oguchi M, Kumada M, et al. Acute radiation dermatitis and pneumonitis in Japanese breast cancer patients with whole breast hypofractionated radiotherapy compared to conventional radiotherapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008;38:334–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest or financial support for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kumiko Karasawa.

About this article

Cite this article

Karasawa, K., Kunogi, H., Hirai, T. et al. Comparison of hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated whole-breast irradiation for early breast cancer patients: a single-institute study of 1,098 patients. Breast Cancer 21, 402–408 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-012-0406-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-012-0406-6

Keywords

Navigation