Skip to main content
Log in

Framing the Debate: Concussion and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Neuroethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Concussion and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) affect millions of people worldwide. mTBI has been called the “signature injury” of the recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, affecting thousands of active duty service men and women, and veterans. Sport-related concussion represents a significant public health problem, with elite and professional athletes, and millions of youth and amateur athletes worldwide suffering concussions annually. These brain injuries have received scant attention from neuroethicists, and the focus of this special issue is on defining the ethical considerations and developing and elucidating the neuroethical contributions to the discussion about concussion and mTBI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martland, Harrison S. 1928. Punch drunk. Journal of the American Medical Association 91(15): 1103–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McKee, Ann C., Thor D. Stein, Christopher J. Nowinski, Robert A. Stern, Daniel H. Daneshvar, Victor E. Alvarez, Hyo-Soon Lee, et al. 2013. The spectrum of disease in chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Brain 136(1): 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McCrory, Paul, Willem H. Meeuwisse, Mark Aubry, Bob Cantu, Jiří Dvořák, Ruben J. Echemendia, Lars Engebretsen, et al. 2013. Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th international conference on concussion in sport held in Zurich, November 2012. British Journal of Sports Medicine 47(5): 250–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Caron, Jeffrey G. and Gordon A. Bloom. 2015. Ethical issues surrounding concussions and player safety in professional ice hockey. Neuroethics. doi:10.1007/s12152-014-9210-7.

  5. Johnson, L. Syd M. 2015. Sport-related neurotrauma and neuroprotection: Are Return-to-Play protocols justified by paternalism? Neuroethics. doi:10.1007/s12152-014-9213-4.

  6. Malanowski, Sarah and Nicholas Baima. 2015. On treating athletes with banned substances: The relationship between mild traumatic brain injury, hypopituitarism, and hormone replacement therapy. Neuroethics. doi:10.1007/s12152-014-9215-2.

  7. Partridge, Brad and Wayne Hall. 2015. Repeated Head Injuries in Australia’s Collision Sports Highlight Ethical and Evidential Gaps in Concussion Management Policies. Neuroethics. doi:10.1007/s12152-014-9217-0.

  8. Gilbert, Frederic. 2015. State of the Concussion Debate: From Sceptical to Alarmist Claims. Neuroethics. doi:10.1007/s12152-014-9219-y.

  9. Hardcastle, Valerie. 2015. Traumatic Brain Injury, Neuroscience, and the Legal System. Neuroethics. doi:10.1007/s12152-014-9221-4.

  10. Greenhow, Annette and Jocelyn East. 2015. Custodians of the Game: Ethical Considerations for Football Governing Bodies in Regulating Concussion Management. Neuroethics. doi:10.1007/s12152-014-9216-1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Syd M. Johnson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnson, L.S.M., Partridge, B. & Gilbert, F. Framing the Debate: Concussion and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Neuroethics 8, 1–4 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-015-9233-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-015-9233-8

Keywords

Navigation