Delusions and Responsibility for Action: Insights from the Breivik Case
What factors should be taken into account when attributing criminal responsibility to perpetrators of severe crimes? We discuss the Breivik case, and the considerations which led to holding Breivik accountable for his criminal acts. We put some pressure on the view that experiencing certain psychiatric symptoms or receiving a certain psychiatric diagnosis is sufficient to establish criminal insanity. We also argue that the presence of delusional beliefs, often regarded as a key factor in determining responsibility, is neither necessary nor sufficient for criminal insanity.
- Melle, I (2013) The Breivik case and what psychiatrists can learn from it. World Psychiatry 12: pp. 16-21 CrossRef
- Måseide, H (2012) The battle about Breivik’s mind. The Lancet 379: pp. 2413 CrossRef
- Persaud, R and Spaaij, R. Inside the mind of Anders Breivik. Huffington Post blog, April 14, 2012. http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/dr-raj-persaud/anders-breivik-psychology-inside-the-mind-of-anders_b_1419343.html (accessed June 2013).
- Gunn, J (2002) No excuses. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 95: pp. 61-63 CrossRef
- Trufetter, G. Conflicting assessments: New report finds Breivik sane ahead of trial. Spiegel Online, April 10, 2012. http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/second-expert-report-deems-breivik-sane-for-trial-a-826673.html (accessed June 2013).
- Wessely, S (2012) Anders Breivik, the public, and psychiatry. The Lancet 379: pp. 1563-1564 CrossRef
- Bentall, R (2006) Madness explained: Why we must reject the Kraepelinian paradigm and replace it with a ‘complaint-orientated’ approach to understanding mental illness. Medical Hypotheses 66: pp. 220-233 CrossRef
- Honey, GD, Fletcher, PC, Bullmore, ET (2002) Advances in neuropsychiatry: Functional brain mapping of psychopathology. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 72: pp. 432-439
- Mayberg, H. 2010. Does neuroscience give us new insights into criminal responsibility? In: Mansfield A, ed. A Judge’s Guide to Neuroscience: A concise Introduction. University of California Santa Barbara: 37–41.
- Broome, MR, Mameli, M, Bortolotti, L (2010) Moral responsibility and mental illness: A case study. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19: pp. 179-187 CrossRef
- Delusions and Responsibility for Action: Insights from the Breivik Case
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Volume 7, Issue 3 , pp 377-382
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Moral responsibility
- Criminal insanity