Abstract
The downturn of the markets in the recent global economic crisis points to a need to question the current dynamics of the market system, a decade after the turn of the millennium. The inequalities with regard to the consumption of resources across world markets, the declared low satisfaction rates over what is offered in the marketplace, and the increasing skepticism with marketing practices are all more pronounced than ever. It is becoming evident that consumer marketing fails in constructing a happier society. Consumers, producers, and governments as the three main market stakeholders, share responsibility for the undesired consequences. This article provides a critical perspective on the contemporary paradigm that dominates marketing thought in relation to the central role and the evolving meaning of consumption in the market economy that is favored by most governments. The core position of the article is that determining happiness as the ultimate end requires a shift to a new societal orientation for all stakeholders of the market system.
Similar content being viewed by others
Further Reading
Black, I. R., & Cherrier, H. 2010. Anti-consumption as part of living a sustainable lifestyle: Daily practices, contextual motivations and subjective values. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 9(6), 467–487.
Borgmann, A. 2000. The moral complexion of consumption. The Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 418–422.
Cova, B. 1997. Community and consumption: Towards a definition of the linking value of product or services. European Journal of Marketing, 31(3), 4–297.
Duesenberry, J. S. 1949. Income, saving and theory of consumer behaviour. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
Easterlin, R. A. 2000. Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27, 35–47.
Firat, A. F., & Venkatesh, A. 1995. Liberatory postmodernism and the renchantment of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 239–267.
Firat, A. F., Dholakia, N., & Venkatesh, A. 1995. Marketing in a postmodern world. European Journal of Marketing, 29(1), 40–56.
Fournier, S. 1998. Consumer resistance: Social motivations, consumer manifestations, and implications in the marketing domain. Advances in Consumer Research, 25, 88–90.
Gordon, J. S. 2012. How the modern economy and regulation grew up together? Society, 49, 256–262.
Hagerty, M. R., & Veenhoven, R. 2003. Wealth and happiness revisited – growing national income does go with greater happiness. Social Indicators Research, 64, 1–27.
Holt, D. B. 2002. Why do brands cause trouble? A dialectical theory of consumer culture and branding. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3/4), 297–316.
İzberk-Bilgin, E. 2010. An interdisciplinary review of resistance to consumption: Some marketing interpretations, and future research suggestions. Consumption Markets & Culture, 13(3), 299–323.
Kotler, P. 1972. A generic concept of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 36(April), 46–54.
Kotler, P., & Zaltman, G. 1971. Social marketing: An approach to planned social change. Journal of Marketing, 35, 3–12.
Kozinets, R. V. 2002. Can consumers escape the market? Emancipatory illuminations from burning man. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 20–38.
Prosenak, D., Bistrica, S., Mulej, M., & Snoj, B. 2008. A requisitely holistic approach to marketing in terms of social well-being. Kybernetes, 37(9/10), 1508–1529.
Ritzer, G. 2005. Enchanting a disenchanted world: Revolutionizing the means of consumption. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. 2010. Production, consumption, prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital prosumer. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13–36.
Roux, D. 2007. Consumer resistance: Proposal for an integrative framework. Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 22(4), 59–79.
Shankar, A., Cherrier, H., & Canniford, R. 2006. Consumer empowerment: A Foucauldian interpretation. European Journal of Marketing, 40(9/10), 1013–30.
Stehr, N. 2008. The moralization of the markets in Europe. Society, 45(1), 62–67.
Veenhoven, R. 2012. Happiness in Nations World Database of Happiness, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands Accessed on (10.08.2012) at: http:/worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_nat/nat_fp.php?mode = 1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aslanbay, Y., Varnali, K. A Future of “Happiness”: Can Markets Be Co-evolved?. Soc 51, 665–669 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-014-9837-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-014-9837-3