Evolution: Education and Outreach

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 257–271

Dimetrodon Is Not a Dinosaur: Using Tree Thinking to Understand the Ancient Relatives of Mammals and their Evolution


    • Department of GeologyThe Field Museum
Original Scientific Article

DOI: 10.1007/s12052-009-0117-4

Cite this article as:
Angielczyk, K.D. Evo Edu Outreach (2009) 2: 257. doi:10.1007/s12052-009-0117-4


The line of descent that includes all living mammals extends back in time over 300 million years. Many of the ancient relatives of mammals that fall along this line are very different in appearance from living mammals and are frequently mistaken for reptiles such as dinosaurs. This misconception is reinforced by the fact that these animals are often referred to as “mammal-like reptiles,” a term reflecting outdated methods for classifying organisms. In reality, these ancient mammal-relatives, known as synapsids, are more closely related to living mammals than they are to any reptiles. Evolutionary trees, which depict patterns of descent from common ancestors among organisms, are very useful for understanding why this is the case and for reconstructing the evolutionary histories of many of the unique characters found in mammals. Here, I provide an introduction to evolutionary trees and their implications for understanding the relationships between mammals, synapsids, and reptiles. This is followed by a review of synapsid diversity and a discussion of how evolutionary trees can be used to investigate when in synapsid history different mammalian characteristics first appeared.


Evolutionary treeMammaliaMammal-like reptileNon-mammalian synapsidPermianPhylogenySynapsidaTree thinkingTriassic

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009