Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Normal Q-angle in an Adult Nigerian Population

  • Original Article
  • Research
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

The Q-angle has been studied among the adult Caucasian population with the establishment of reference values. Scientists are beginning to accept the concept of different human races. Physical variability exists between various African ethnic groups and Caucasians as exemplified by differences in anatomic features such as a flat nose compared with a pointed nose, wide rather than narrow faces, and straight rather than curly hair. Therefore, we cannot assume the same Q-angle values will be applicable to Africans and Caucasians. We established a baseline reference value for normal Q-angles among asymptomatic Nigerian adults. The Q-angles of the left and right knees were measured using a goniometer in 477 Nigerian adults (354 males; 123 females) in the supine and standing positions. The mean Q-angles for men were 10.7° ± 2.2° in the supine position and 12.3° ± 2.2° in the standing position in the right knee. The left knee Q-angles in men were 10.5° ± 2.6° in the supine position and 11.7° ± 2.8° in the standing position. In women, the mean Q-angles for the right knee were 21° ± 4.8° in the supine position and 22.8° ± 4.7° in the standing position. The mean Q-angles for the left knee in women were 20.9° ± 4.6° in the supine position and 22.7° ± 4.6° in the standing position. We observed a difference in Q-angles in the supine and standing positions for all participants. The Q-angle in adult Nigerian men is comparable to that of adult Caucasian men, but the Q-angle of Nigerian women is greater than that of their Caucasian counterparts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Insall JN, Cerulli G. Patellar pain and incongruence. I: Measurements of incongruence. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;176:217–224.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blake CR, Lai WW, Edward DP. Racial and ethnic differences in ocular anatomy. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2003;43:9–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Byl T, Cole JA, Livingston LA. What determines the magnitude of the Q angle? A preliminary study of selected skeletal and muscular measures. J Sport Rehab. 2000;9:26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clark LT. Anatomic substrate differences between black and white victims of sudden cardiac death: hypertension, coronary artery disease, or both? Clin Cardiol. 1989;12(suppl 4):IV13–17.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hahn T, Foldspang A. The Q angle and sport. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1997;7:43–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Handa VL, Lockhart ME, Fielding JR, Bradley CS, Brubaker L, Cundiff GW, Ye W, Richter HE. Racial differences in pelvic anatomy by magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:914–920.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Herrington L, Nester C. Q-angle undervalued? The relationship between Q-angle and medio-lateral position of the patella. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004;19:1070–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Holmes SW Jr, Clancy WG Jr. Clinical classification of patellofemoral pain and dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;28:299–306.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Horton MG, Hall TL. Quadriceps femoris muscle angle: normal values and relationships with gender and selected skeletal measures. Phys Ther. 1989;69:897–901.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hungerford DS, Barry M. Biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;144:9–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hvid I, Andersen LB, Schmidt H. Chondromalacia patellae: the relation to abnormal patellofemoral joint mechanics. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52:661–666.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Leroi AM. A family tree in every gene. The New York Times. March 14, 2005.

  13. Livingston LA. The quadriceps angle: a review of the literature. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;28:105–109.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Manual of Orthopedic Surgery. Park Ridge, IL: American Orthopaedic Association; 1972.

  15. McConnell J. The management of chondromalacia patellae: a long-term solution. Aust J Physiotherapy. 1986;32:215–223.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mizuno Y, Kumagai M, Mattessich SM, Elias JJ, Ramrattan N, Cosgarea AJ, Chao EY. Q-angle influences tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics. J Orthop Res. 2001;19:834–840.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ogunlade SO, Alonge TO, Omololu AB, Adekolujo OS. Clinical spectrum of large joint osteoarthritis in Ibadan, Nigeria. Eur J Sci Res. 2005;11:116–122.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Omololu B, Tella A, Ogunlade SO, Adeyemo AA, Adebisi A, Alonge TO, Salawu SA, Akinpelu AO. Normal values of knee angle, intercondylar and intermalleolar distances in Nigerian children. West Afr J Med. 2003;22:301–304.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Outerbridge RE. Further studies on the etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1964;46:179–190.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sanfridsson J, Arnbjornsson A, Friden T, Ryd L, Svahn G, Jonsson K. Femorotibial rotation and the Q-angle related to the dislocating patella. Acta Radiol. 2001;42:218–224.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Simmons K. The Bush Foundation study of child growth and development. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1944;9:1–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilson T, Kitsell F. Is the Q-angle an absolute or variable measure? Physiotherapy. 2002;88:296–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Woodland LH, Francis RS. Parameters and comparisons of the quadriceps angle of college-aged men and women in the supine and standing positions. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20:208–211.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria

    Bade B. Omololu MBBS, FRCS, FWACS, Olusegun S. Ogunlade MD, FRCS & Vinod K. Gopaldasani MD

Authors
  1. Bade B. Omololu MBBS, FRCS, FWACS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Olusegun S. Ogunlade MD, FRCS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vinod K. Gopaldasani MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bade B. Omololu MBBS, FRCS, FWACS.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

About this article

Cite this article

Omololu, B.B., Ogunlade, O.S. & Gopaldasani, V.K. Normal Q-angle in an Adult Nigerian Population. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467, 2073–2076 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0637-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0637-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation