Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Willingness of Private Forest Owners to Supply Woody Biomass in Croatia

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Small-scale Forestry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Renewable energy sources have received significant attention in European countries as a result of increasing dependence on energy imports and concerns over high prices of fuels and climate change. Although private forests in Croatia account for less than one quarter of all forests, they may play an important role in woody biomass energy production, due to their underutilized exploitation. The objective of this paper is to identify the willingness of private forest owners to supply woody biomass and to understand how this willingness is affected by certain owner, management and forest property characteristics. A survey conducted in Croatia in 2012 of a random sample of 350 private forest owners shows that almost half of them were willing to supply woody biomass. A random utility model was used to determine the factors influencing private forest owners’ willingness to supply woody biomass. The results showed that willingness to supply woody biomass was influenced by property size, management objectives (production of fuel wood for personal needs and using the forest for outdoor recreation), cooperation with other forest owners and owner age. In order to enhance woody biomass mobilization from private forests it is important to identify the owners who are willing to supply it and to provide them with financial and administrative support using a mix of developed forest policy instruments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In our study the FAO definition of woody biomass was used: “the mass of woody part (stem, bark, branches, twigs) of trees, alive or dead, shrubs and bushes, excluding stumps and roots, foliage, flowers and seeds”.

  2. The project “Research into Organization of Private Forest Owners' Interest Associations in the Western Balkan Region—PRIFORT” was financed by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management of Republic of Austria.

  3. The project “Opportunities for Wood Energy Production from Small-scale Forests in the South-Eastern Europe Region—WESSPROFOR” financed by Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland and coordinated by the European Forest Institute.

References

  • Beach RH, Pattanayak SK, Yang J-C, Murray BC, Abt RC (2005) Econometric studies of non-industrial private forest management: a review and synthesis. For Policy Econ 7(3):261–281. doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00065-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin J, Liliholm JR, Damery D (2009) Challenges and opportunities for the Northeastern forest bioindustry. J For 107(3):125–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Benković Z, Sušnik H (2008) Wood biomass raw material for the production of second generation biofuels. In: Grbac I (ed) Wood is First - attributes, technology, valorization, implementation. Faculty of Forestry, University of Zagreb, INNOVAWOOD, Zagreb, pp 63–68

  • Čavlović J (2010) The first national forest inventory of the Republic of Croatia. Ministry of Regional Development, Forestry and Water Management and Forestry Faculty of the University in Zagreb, Zagreb

  • Conrad JL, Bolding MC, Smith RL, Aust WM (2011) Wood-energy market impact on competition, procurement practices, and profitability of landowners and forest products industry in the U.S. south. Biomass Bioenergy 35(1):280–287. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway MC, Amacher GS, Sullivan J, Wear D (2003) Decisions nonindustrial forest landowners make: an empirical examination. J For Econ 9(3):181–203. doi:10.1078/1104-6899-00034

    Google Scholar 

  • Croatian Parliament (2009) Energy strategy of the Republic Croatia. Ministry of Economy, Labour and Entrepreneurship, Zagreb

  • Dennis DF (1989) An economic analysis of harvest behavior: integrating forest and ownership characteristics. For Sci 35(4):1088–1104

    Google Scholar 

  • EU (2009) Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC vol OJ L 140. European Parliament and Council of the European Union, Brussels

  • EU (2013) A new EU Forest Strategy: for forests and the forest-based sector. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Field A (2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Glück P, Avdibegović M, Čabaravdić A, Nonić D, Petrović N, Posavec S, Stojanovska M (2010) The preconditions for the formation of private forest owners’ interest associations in the Western Balkan Region. For Policy Econ 12(4):250–263. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2010.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glück P, Avdibegović M, Čabaravdić A, Nonić D, Petrović N, Posavec S, Stojanovska M (2011) Private forest owners in the Western Balkans—ready for the formation of interest associations. European Forest Institute, Joensuu

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruchy SR, Grebner DL, Munn IA, Joshi O, Hussain A (2012) An assessment of nonindustrial private forest landowner willingness to harvest woody biomass in support of bioenergy production in Mississippi: a contingent rating approach. For Policy Econ 15(2):140–145. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2011.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halder P, Paladinić E, Stevanov M, Orlović S, Hokkanen TJ, Pelkonen P (2014) Energy wood production from private forests—non-industrial private forest owners’ perceptions and attitudes in Croatia and Serbia. Renew Sust Energy Rev 35:515–526. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi S, Arano KG (2009) Determinants of private forest management decisions: a study on West Virginia NIPF landowners. For Policy Econ 11(2):118–125. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2008.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi O, Mehmood SR (2011) Factors affecting nonindustrial private forest landowners’ willingness to supply woody biomass for bioenergy. Biomass Bioenergy 35(1):186–192. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi O, Grebner DL, Hussain A, Grado SC (2013) Landowner knowledge and willingness to supply woody biomass for wood-based bioenergy: sample selection approach. J For Econ 19(2):97–109. doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2012.11.003

    Google Scholar 

  • Kajba D, Andrić I (2014) Selection of willows (Salix sp.) for biomass production. South-East Eur For 5(2):145–151. doi:10.15177/seefor.14-14

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajter Ostoić S et al. (2015) Forest land ownership change in Croatia. In: Živojinović I, Weiss G, Lidestav G, Feliciano D, Hujala T, Dobšinska Z, Lawrence A, Nybakk E, Quiroga S, Schraml U (eds) COST Action FP1201 FACESMAP country report. European Forest Institute Central-East and South-East European Regional Office, Vienna, p 40

  • Kennedy SN (2001) Reservation prices and willingness to accept prices offers for nonindustrial forest landowners in Western Virginia. Master of Science. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

  • Kuuluvainen J, Karppinen H, Ovaskainen V (1996) Landowner objectives and non-industrial private timber supply. For Sci 42:300–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindstad BH et al (2015) Forest-based bioenergy policies in five European countries: an explorative study of interactions with national and EU policies. Biomass Bioenergy 80:102–113. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.04.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch L, Hardie IW, Parker D (2002) Analyzing agricultural landowners’ willingness to install streamside buffers. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/28570/1/wp02-01.pdf. Accessed 23 Nov 2014

  • Majumdar I, Teeter L, Butler B (2008) Characterizing family forest owners: a cluster analysis approach. For Sci 54(2):176–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski C (1977) The structure of random utility models. Theor Dec 8(3):229–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM et al (2002) Modeling changes in wildlife habitat and timber revenues in response to forest management. For Sci 48(2):191–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihelič M, Spinelli R, Magagnotti N, Poje A (2015) Performance of new industrial chipper for rural contractors. Biomass Bioenergy 83:152–158. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlić S (1999) Drugi proredni zahvat, produkcija biomase i njezin kemizam u kulturi obične smreke Velika Buna. Radovi Šumarskog instituta 34(2):39–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters DM et al (2015) Energy wood from forests—stakeholder perception in five European countries. Energy Sustain Soc 5(17):1–12. doi:10.1186/s13705-015-0045-9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pezdevšek Malovrh Š (2010) Influence of institutions and forms of cooperation on private forest management. Dissertation, University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Forestry and Renewable Forest Resources

  • Pezdevšek Malovrh Š, Zadnik Stirn L, Krč J (2010) Influence of property and ownership conditions on willingness to cooperate. Šumarski list 134(3–4):139–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezdevšek Malovrh Š, Nonić D, Glavonjić P, Nedeljković J, Avdibegović M, Krč J (2015) Private forest owner typologies in Slovenia and Serbia: targeting private forest owner groups for policy implementation. Small-scale For 14(4):423–440. doi:10.1007/s11842-015-9296-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck RS, Rubinfeld DL (1981) Econometric models and economic forecasts. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Posavec S, Trninić S (2008) Small-scale rural forest historical trends and present distribution in Croatia. In: Buttoud G (ed) Small-scale rural forest use and management: global policies versus local knowledge, IUFRO Unit 3.08: Small-scale forest management. Gérardmer, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Posavec S, Mersudin A, Dženan B, Nenad P, Makedonka S, Dane M, Špela PM (2015) Private forest owners’ willingness to supply woody biomass in selected South-Eastern European countries. Biomass Bioenergy 81:144–153. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prelec Z, Beronja M, Medica V (2004) Use of wood biomass in a cogeneration system with an indirectly fired gas turbine. In: Frankovic B (ed) Energy and the environment. Hrvatsko društvo za sunčevu energiju, Opatija, pp 219–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Risović S, Domac J, Kajba D, Bogdan S, Šegon V (2004) Bioenergy in Croatia: how to bridge the gap between resource potential and implementation. In: Van Swaaij WPM, Fjallstrom T, Helm P, Grassi A (eds) Proceedings of the second world biomass conference. ETA-Florence, WIP-Munich, pp 2404–2407

    Google Scholar 

  • Risović S, Đukić I, Vučković K (2008) Energy analysis of pellets made of wood residues. Croat J For Eng 29(1):95–108

    Google Scholar 

  • S.Inc. PASW Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0. 2009

  • Shivan GC, Mehmood SR (2010) Factors influencing nonindustrial private forest landowners’ policy preference for promoting bioenergy. For Policy Econ 12(8):581–588. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2010.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shivan GC, Mehmood SR (2012) Determinants of nonindustrial private forest landowner willingness to accept price offers for woody biomass. For Policy Econ 25:47–55. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sipila K, Makinen T, Wilen C, Solantausta Y, Arasrto A, Helynen S (2008) Bioenergy in Europe: implementation of EU directives and policies relating to bioenergy in Europe and RD&D priorites for the future. In: Luxmore C (ed) VTT Tiedotteita-Research Notes. VTRCo, Finland, p 59

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjølie HK, Becker D, Håbesland D, Solberg B, Lindstad BH, Snyder S, Kilgore M (2016) Willingness of nonindustrial private forest owners in norway to supply logging residues for wood energy. Small-scale For 15(1):29–43. doi:10.1007/s11842-015-9306-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stupak I et al (2007) Sustainable utilisation of forest biomass for energy—possibilities and problems: policy, legislation, certification, and recommendations and guidelines in the Nordic, Baltic, and other European countries. Biomass Bioenergy 31(10):666–684. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Economy (2013) Energy in Croatia 2013 - Annual energy report. Ministry of Economy, Republic of Croatia, Zagreb. http://www.eihp.hr/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Energija2013.pdf. Accessed 16 April 2016

  • Ministry of Economy (2014) The third national energy efficiency Action Plan of the Republic of Croatia for the Period from 2014 to 2016. Ministry of Economy, Republic of Croatia, Zagreb. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/2014_neeap_en_croatia.pdf. Accessed 16 April 2016

  • Topić V, Butorac L, Perić S (2006) Biomass of oriental hornbeam (Carpinus orientalis Mill.) shrub in submediterranean part of Croatia. Radovi Šumarskog instituta 9:139–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Topić V, Butorac L, Jelić G (2009) Biomass in strawberry tree coppice forests (Arbutus unedo L.) on island Brač. Šumarski list 133(1–2):5–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Vokoun M, Amacher GS, Wear DN (2006) Scale of harvesting by non-industrial private forest landowners. J For Econ 11(4):223–244. doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2005.10.002

    Google Scholar 

  • World Energy Council (2008) Europe’s vulnerability to energy crises: executive summary, https://www.worldenergy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2012/10/PUB_Europes_Vulnerability_to_Energy_Crisis_Exec_Summary_2008_WEC.pdf. Accessed 18 Apr 2016

  • Zečić Ž, Vusić D (2013) Biomass production potential of black pine (Pinus nigra Arn.) in forest cultures. In: Anić I, Tomić F, Matić S (eds) Šumarstvo i poljoprivreda hrvatskog Sredozemlja na pragu Europske Unije. Hrvatska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti, Zagreb, pp 161–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Zečić Ž, Tikvić I, Vusić D (2013) The potential of biomass for energy production in continental croatia in relation to specific habitat conditions and tree species. In: Anić I, Tomić F, Matić S (eds) Food production and forestry–basis for development for Eastern Croatia. HAZU, Zagreb, pp 313–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Mehmood SR (2001) Predicting nonindustrial private forest landowners’ choices of a forester for harvesting and tree planting assistance in Alabama. South J Appl For 25(3):101–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Zhang D, Schelhas J (2005) Small-scale non-industrial private forest ownership in the United States: rationale and implications for forest management. Silva Fenn 39(3):443–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted within WESSPROFOR project, which arose in the context of the project “Forest Policy Education and Research in the SEE regions (FOPER)”. The FOPER project was funded by Finnish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and coordinated by European Forest Institute. The authors of this study are very grateful for the above mentioned financial support. Also, we gratefully acknowledge Karlo Beljan, PhD, who carried out the survey and provided helpful feedback, and to Silvija Krajter Ostoić, PhD, for reviewing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Curman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Curman, M., Posavec, S. & Pezdevšek Malovrh, Š. Willingness of Private Forest Owners to Supply Woody Biomass in Croatia. Small-scale Forestry 15, 551–567 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-016-9339-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-016-9339-9

Keywords

Navigation