Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study on antibody immobilization strategies onto solid surface

  • Biotechnology
  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Antibody immobilization onto solid surface has been studied extensively for a number of applications including immunoassays, biosensors, and affinity chromatography. For most applications, a critical consideration regarding immobilization of antibody is orientation of its antigen-binding site with respect to the surface. We compared two oriented antibody immobilization strategies which utilize thiolated-protein A/G and thiolated-secondary antibody as linker molecules with the case of direct surface immobilization of thiol-conjugated target antibody. Antibody immobilization degree and surface topography were evaluated by surface plasmon resonance and atomic force microscope, respectively. Protein A/G-mediated immobilization strategy showed the best result and secondary antibody-mediated immobilization was the worst for the total immobilization levels of target antibodies. However, when considering real-to-ideal ratio for antigen binding, total target antigen binding levels (oriented target antibody immobilization levels) had the following order: secondary antibody-mediated immobilization>protein A/G-mediated immobilization>direct thiol-conjugated immobilization. Thus, we confirmed that protein A/G- and secondary antibody-mediated strategies, which consider orientation of target antibody immobilization, showed significantly high antigen binding efficiencies compared to direct random immobilization method. Collectively, the oriented antibody immobilization methods using linker materials could be useful in diverse antibody-antigen interaction-involved application fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A.G. Richard, J. K. Thomas, A. O. Barbara and K. Janis, Immunology, New York (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. S. Aga and E. M. Thurman, Immunochemical technology for environmental applications, Amer. Chem. Soc. Symp., 657, 1 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. X. You, D. M. Disley, D. C. Cullen and C. R. Lowe, Micron, 26, 121 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. D. S. Hage, Anal. Chem., 67, 455 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. B. Lu, M. R. Smyth and R. Okennedy, Analyst, 121, 29 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. T. M. Spitznagel and D. S. Clark, Biotechnology, 11, 825 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Kaku, S. Nakanishi and K. Horiguchi, Anal. Chim. Acta, 225, 283 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. G. T. Hermanson, Bioconjugate techniques, Academic Press, CA (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Zhu and M. Synder, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 7, 55 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. R. F. Taylor, Protein Immobilization, New York (1990).

  11. C. Suárez-Pantaléon, J. Wichers, A. Abad-Somovilla, A. van Amerongen and A. Abad-Fuentes, Biosens. Bioelectron., 42, 170 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. F. Caruso, E. Rodda and D. N. Furlong, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 178, 104 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Steinitz, Anal. Biochem., 282, 232 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. R. R. Traut, A. Bollen, T. T. Sun, J.W. Hershey, J. Sundberg and L. R. Pierce, Biochemistry, 12 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  15. W. D. Sikkema, An Fc-binding protein, Amer. Biotech. Lab., 7, 42 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Y. M. Bae, B.K. Oh, W. Lee, W. H. Lee and J.W. Choi, Biosens. Bioelectron., 21, 103 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. E. H. Alfred, J. Immunol., 37, 77 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. P. Quist, A. A. Bergman, C. T. Reimann, S. O. Oscarsson and B. U. R. Sundqvist, Scanning Microsc., 9, 395 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. A. San Paulo and R. Garcia, Biophys. J., 78, 1599 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyung Joon Cha.

Additional information

Equal contribution

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, J.E., Seo, J.H., Kim, C.S. et al. A comparative study on antibody immobilization strategies onto solid surface. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 30, 1934–1938 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-013-0117-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-013-0117-5

Key words

Navigation