Skip to main content
Log in

Consequences of moderate drought stress on the net photosynthesis, water-use efficiency and biomass production of three poplar clones

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Acta Physiologiae Plantarum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The breeding of efficient but drought-tolerant poplar clones is very important for short-rotation planting because of frequent periods with low precipitation in Central Europe. Three clones exhibiting very different shoot–root ratios under well-watered conditions were investigated: (1) the aspen clone Großdubrau No. 1 (Populus tremula); (2) the newly bred aspen clone L316 × L9 No. 21 Thermo (P. tremula × P. tremula); (3) and the poplar clone Max2 (P. maximowiczii × P. trichocarpa). All three clones were exposed to moderate drought stress. Photosynthesis and transpiration were measured. The influences of drought on the biometrical parameters of the plants were evaluated. The intrinsic water-use efficiency (WUEintrinsic) was calculated. Height growth was decreased in stressed plants. Photosynthesis and water conductivity were significantly decreased, which is why the WUEintrinsic exhibited a greater increase in Max2 than in the aspen clones. The poplar clone Max2 showed low WUE after sufficient watering, but this parameter exhibited a greater increase under drought stress compared with the aspen clones. Max2 was characterised by intensive root growth that was diminished under stress. In contrast, both aspen clones were less adaptive to moderate drought stress. The capability to change the WUEintrinsic under different water availabilities can be considered a possible selection criterion for breeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  • Anderegg WRL, Plavcová L, Anderegg LDL, Hacke UG, Berry JA, Field CB (2013) Drought’s legacy: multiyear hydraulic deterioration underlies widespread aspen forest die-off and portends increased future risk. Glob Change Biol 19:1188–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arango-Velez A, Zwiazeka JJ, Thomasa BR, Tyree MT (2011) Stomatal factors and vulnerability of stem xylem to cavitation in poplars. Physiol Plant 143:154–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Attia Z, Domec J-C, Oren R, Way DA, Moshelion M (2015) Growth and physiological responses of isohydric and anisohydric poplars to drought. J Exp Bot 66:4373–4381

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bassman JH, Zwier JC (1991) Gas exchange characteristics of Populus trichocarpa, Populus deltoides and Populus trichocarpa × P. deltoides clones. Tree Physiol 8:145–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baum S, Weih M, Busch G, Kroiher F, Bolte A (2009) The impact of Short Rotation Coppice plantations on phytodiversity. Landbauforschung vTI Agric For Res 59:163–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz FA (1991) Habitat selection in plants. Am Nat 137:S116–S130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceulemans R, Impens I, Imler R (1988) Stomatal conductance and stomatal behaviour in Populus clones and hybrids. Can J Bot 66:1404–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaves MM, Flexas J, Pinheiro C (2009) Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann Bot 103:551–560

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Demeritt ME Jr (1990) Populus L. poplar hybrids. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH (eds) Silvics of North America, vol 1 Hardwoods. Agricultural Handbook 654. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillen SY, Djomo SN, Al Afas N, Vanbeveren S, Ceulemans R (2013) Biomass yield and energy balance of a shortrotation poplar coppice with multiple clones on degraded land during 16 years. Biomass Bioenergy 56:157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer E, Bogeat-Triboulot MB, Le Thiec D, Guehl JM, Brignolas F, Villar M, Bastien C, Martin F, Kohler A (2004) Drought tolerance of poplars: can we expect to improve it? Biofutur 247:54–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald D, Ulrich K, Naujoks G, Schröder MB (2009) Induction of tetraploid poplar and black locust plants using colchicine: chloroplast number as an early marker for selecting polyploids in vitro. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 99:353–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT (1989) Carbon- isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Mol Biol 40:503–507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fry DA (2008) The biodiversity of short rotation willow coppice in Wales, with particular reference to birds. Thesis for PhD, UMI U585248, Cardiff University, UK

  • Ismail AM, Hall AE, Bray EA (1994) Drought and pot size effects on transpiration efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination of cowpea accessions and hybrids. Aust J Plant Physiol 21:23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Licht LA, Isebrands JG (2005) Linking phytoremediated pollutant removal to biomass economic opportunities. Biomass Bioenergy 28:203–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler HK, Wellburn AR (1983) Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem Soc Trans 11:591–592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Dickmann DI (1996) Effects of water and nitrogen interaction on net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and water-use efficiency in two hybrid poplar clones. Physiol Plant 97:507–512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lüttschwager D, Ewald D, Atanet Alía L (2015) Comparative examinations of gas exchange and biometrical parameters of eight fast-growing poplar clones. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 37:214. doi:10.1007/s11738-015-1968-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marron N, Delay D, Petit JM, Dreyer E, Kahlem G, Delmotte FM, Brignolas F (2002) Physiological traits of two Populus × euramericana clones, Luisa Avanzo and Dorskamp, during a water stress and re-watering cycle. Tree Physiol 22:849–858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer M, Solger A, Krabel D (2013) Xylem cell length under drought and its value for predicting radial growth of SRF poplar cultivars (Populus spp.). Trees 27:1353–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monclus R, Dreyer E, Villar M, Delmotte FM, Delay D, Petit JM, Barbaroux C, Le Thiec D, Brèchet C, Brignolas F (2006) Impact of drought on productivity and water use efficiency in 29 genotypes of Populus deltoides × Populus nigra. New Phytol 169:765–777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monclus R, Villar M, Barbaroux C, Bastien C, Fichot R, Dreyer E, Delmotte FM, Delay D, Petit J, Bre C (2009) Productivity, water-use efficiency and tolerance to moderate water deficit correlate in 33 poplar genotypes from a Populus deltoides × Populus trichocarpa F 1 progeny. Tree Physiol 29:1329–1339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nash RM (2009) Drought adaptations of hybrid poplar clones commonly grown on the Canadian prairies. Thesis for a Master of Science. University of Saskatchewan, Canada

  • Ni B-R, Pallardy SG (1991) Response of gas exchange to water stress in seedlings of woody angiosperms. Tree Physiol 8:1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson DJ, Raffa KF (1998) Productivity, drought tolerance and pest status in hybrid Populus: tree improvement and silvicultural implications. Biomass Bioenergy 14:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rood SB, Bratney JH, Hughes FM (2003) Ecophysiology of riparian cottonwoods: streamflow dependency, water relations and restoration. Tree Physiol 23:1113–1124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MG (2011) Tree responses to drought. Tree Physiol 31:237–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte PJ, Hinckley TM, Stettler RF (1987) Stomatal responses of Populus to leaf water potential. Can J Bot 65:255–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silim S, Nash R, Reynard D, White B, Schroeder W (2009) Leaf gas exchange and water potential responses to drought in nine poplar (Populus spp.) clones with contrasting drought tolerance. Trees 23:959–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tambussi EA, Bort J, Araus JL (2007) Water use efficiency in C3 cereals under Mediterranean conditions: a review of physiological aspects. Ann Appl Biol 150:307–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschaplinski TJ, Tuskan GA, Gunderson CA (1994) Water-stress tolerance of black cottonwood and eastern cottonwood clones and four of their hybrid progeny. Chapt I: Growth, water relations and gas exchange. Can J Forest Res 24:364–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschaplinski TJ, Tuskan GA, Sewell MM, Gebre GM, Todd DE, Pendley CD (2006) Phenotypic variation and quantitative trait locus identification for osmotic potential in an interspecific hybrid inbred F2 poplar pedigree grown in contrasting environments. Tree Physiol 26:595–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich K, Ulrich A, Ewald D (2008) Diversity of endophytic bacterial communities in poplar grown under field conditions. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 63:169–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Zhou G, Shimizu H (2010) Plant responses to drought and rewatering. Plant Signal Behav 5:649–654

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was funded and supported by the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Agency for Renewable Resources (FNR) under FKZ: 22012510. We thank Christine Ewald for her technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dietmar Lüttschwager.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Zwiazek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lüttschwager, D., Ewald, D. & Atanet Alía, L. Consequences of moderate drought stress on the net photosynthesis, water-use efficiency and biomass production of three poplar clones. Acta Physiol Plant 38, 27 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-015-2057-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-015-2057-7

Keywords

Navigation