Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic Single-Anastomosis Duodenal–Jejunal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADJB-SG): Short-term Result and Comparison with Gastric Bypass

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laparoscopic duodeno–jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (DJB-SG) has been introduced as a novel metabolic surgery from Asia recently. It provides benefits of avoiding the risk of remnant gastric cancer, minimization of malnutrition from duodenal switch. Here, we introduce the technique of single-loop anastomosis duodeno–jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADJB-SG) and compare with other gastric bypass surgeries. Fifty morbid obese patients underwent our novel procedure, laparoscopic SADJB-S from 2011 to 2013. Operative complication, weight loss, and diabetes remission were followed. All procedures were completed laparoscopically. The mean operative time was 181.7 ± 38.4 min, and the mean hospital stay was 3.8 days. Three minor early complications (6 %) were encountered but no major complication was noted. There was no significant difference in perioperative parameters between the SADJB-SG and gastric bypass except a longer operation time. The mean BMI decreased from 38.4 to 25.4 at 1 year after surgery with a mean weight loss of 32.7 % which is higher than gastric bypass. Laparoscopic SADJB-SG appears to be an ideal metabolic/bariatric surgery, whereas the efficacy is non-inferior to gastric bypass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obes Surg. 2013;23:427–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kasama K, Tagaya N, Kanehira E, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with duodenojejunal bypass: technique and preliminary results. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1341–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Raj PP, Kumaravel R, Chandramaliteeswaran C, et al. Laparoscopic duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: preliminary results of a prospective series from India. Obes Surg. 2012;26:688–92.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sanchez-Pernaute A, Herrera AR, Perez-Aguirre MEP, et al. Proximal duodenal-ileal end-to-side bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: proposed technique. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1611–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sanchez-Pernaute A, Herrera AR, Perez-Aguirre MEP, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). One- to three-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2010;20:1720–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee WJ, Yu PY, Wang W, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242:20–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1827–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee WJ, Huang MT, Wang W, et al. Bariatric surgery: Asia-pacific perspective. Obes Surg. 2005;15:751–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dixon JB, Zimmet P, Alberti KG, et al. Bariatric surgery: an IDF statement for obese type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2011;28:628–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang W, Wei PL, Lee YC, et al. Short-term results of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2005;15:648–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Søvik TT, Taha O, Aasheim ET, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic duodenal switch for superobesity. Br J Surg. 2010;97(2):160–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Søvik TT, Aasheim ET, Taha O, et al. Weight loss, cardiovascular risk factors, and quality of life after gastric bypass and duodenal switch. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(5):281–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, et al. Bariatric surgery versus conventional medical therapy for type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(17):1577–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aasheim ET, Björkman S, Søvik TT, et al. Vitamin status after bariatric surgery: a randomized study of gastric bypass and duodenal switch. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(1):15–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Khitin L, Roses RE, Brikett DH. Cancer in the gastric remnant after gastric bypass: a case report. Curr Surg. 2003;60:521–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Escalona A et al. Gastric cancer after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2005;15:423–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Corsini D, Simoneti C, Moreira G, et al. Cancer in the excluded stomach 4 years after gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2006;16:932–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Harper J, Beech D, Tichansky D, et al. Cancer in the bypassed stomach presenting early after gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1268–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Peterli R, Wolnerhanssen B, Peters T, et al. Improvement in glucose metabolism after bariatric surgery: comparison of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2009;250:234–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Karamanakos SN, Vagenas K, Kalfarentzos F, et al. Weight loss, appetite suppression, and changes in fasting and postprandial ghrelin and peptide-YY levels after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective, double blind study. Ann Surg. 2008;247:401–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ohta M, Kitano S, Kasama K, et al. Results of a national survey on laparoscopic bariatric surgery in Japan, 2000–2009. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2011;4:138–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. De Paula AL, Stival AR, Macedo A, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing 2 versions of laparoscopic ileal interposition associated with sleeve gastrectomy for patients with type 2 diabetes with BMI 21–34 kg/m(2). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:296–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee WJ, Chong K, Ser KH, et al. Gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg. 2011;146:143–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1567–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei-Jei Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, WJ., Lee, KT., Kasama, K. et al. Laparoscopic Single-Anastomosis Duodenal–Jejunal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADJB-SG): Short-term Result and Comparison with Gastric Bypass. OBES SURG 24, 109–113 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-1067-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-1067-z

Keywords

Navigation