Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Community sustainability and agricultural landscape change: insights into the durability and vulnerability of the productivist regime

  • Special Feature: Original Article
  • Pathways towards sustainable landscapes
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Food is produced in material places: distinct combinations of landform, soil, climate, hydrology and biota. However, agricultural landscapes are more than material, they are also social. Biophysical materials interact with phenomena including communities of place, and the wider economic, political and social context, to produce particular practices and arrangements of food production. The sociologically informed concept of place-making has recently been introduced to sustainability science, with the suggestion that it can assist in identifying practical pathways towards more sustainable landscapes, through offering insight into this variety of relations between the physical and the social. Here, we apply this perspective to a case study of an Australian rural community of place that is grappling with questions surrounding the future of its farm land. We have used “community sustainability” as a conceptual entry point for exploring how landscape development trajectories result from discursive place-frames that draw on different sets of place-making relations. In this case, the relations that reproduce a broadly “productivist” trajectory in landscape change are strong, but under some pressure, most evident in community perceptions of the relative unattractiveness of traditional farming livelihoods to a younger generation. However, place-making relations that might lead in alternative directions are weak. Incremental change towards a more diverse agricultural landscape appears possible if different economic and discursive relations can be drawn on to create a different place-frame that offers an equivalent promise for maintaining community in place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABS (2014) 2011 Census of population and housing: TableBuilder basic. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra. Retrieved 11 June 2014, from http://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/censushome.nsf/home/tablebuilder

  • Alston M (2005) Gender perspectives in Australian rural community life. In: Cocklin C, Dibden J (eds) Sustainability and change in Rural Australia. University of New South Wales Press, Sydney, pp 139–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri MA (1995) Agroecology: the science of sustainable agriculture, 2nd edn. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambler-Edwards S, Bailey K, Kiff A, Lang T, Lee R, Marsden T, Simons D, Tibbs H (2009). Food futures: rethinking UK strategy. Chatham House, London. Retrieved 17 Aug 2012, from http://www.chathamhouse.org/publications/papers/view/108958

  • Auclair E, Vanoni D (2003) The attractiveness of rural areas for young people. In: Jentsch B, Shucksmith M (eds) Young people in rural areas of Europe. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr N (2008) The social landscapes of rural Victoria. In: Pettit C, Cartwright W, Bishop I et al (eds) Landscape analysis and visualisation. Springer, Berlin, pp 305–325

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørkhaug H, Richards CA (2008) Multifunctional agriculture in policy and practice? A comparative analysis of Norway and Australia. J Rural Stud 24(1):98–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourke L (2001) Rural communities. In: Lockie S, Bourke L (eds) Rurality bites: the social and environmental transformation of rural Australia. Pluto Press, Annandale, pp 118–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridge P (2014). North east dairy regional growth plan and workforce development strategy. Bridge Logic Consulting, Yackandandah. Retrieved 27 May 2014, from http://www.towong.vic.gov.au/business-investment/local-business-investment/agriculture/images/NE_Dairy_Plan.pdf

  • Bryan BA, Meyer WS, Campbell CA, Harris GP, Lefroy T, Lyle G, Martin P, McLean J, Montagu K, Rickards LA, Summers DM, Thackway R, Wells S, Young M (2013) The second industrial transformation of Australian landscapes. Curr Opin Env Sustain 5(3–4):278–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton RJF (2004) Seeing through the ‘good farmer’s’ eyes: towards developing an understanding of the social symbolic value of ‘productivist’ behaviour. Sociol Rural 44(2):195–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton R, Wilson GA (2012) The rejuvenation of productivist agriculture: the case for ‘cooperative neo-productivism’. In: Almås R, Campbell H (eds) Rethinking agricultural policy regimes: food security, climate change and the future resilience of global agriculture. Emerald, Bingley, pp 51–72

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Buttel FH (2006) Sustaining the unsustainable: agro-food systems and environment in the modern world. In: Cloke P, Marsden TK, Mooney PH (eds) The handbook of rural studies. SAGE, London, pp 213–230

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell A (2009) Paddock to plate: policy propositions for sustaining food & farming systems. Australian Conservation Foundation, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Dairy Australia (2012). Enhancing livelihoods, improving wellbeing, reducing environmental impact: a strategic framework for keeping the Australian dairy industry in business for the long term. Australian Dairy Industry Council Inc. and Dairy Australia, Melbourne. Retrieved 28 May 2014, from http://www.dairyaustralia.com.au/Industry-information/Sustainability/Industry-sustainability.aspx

  • Dairy Australia (2013). Dairy 2013 situation and outlook. Dairy Australia, Melbourne. Retrieved 9 July 2013, from http://www.dairyaustralia.com.au/Statistics-and-markets/Dairy-Situation-and-Outlook.aspx

  • Dibden J, Cocklin C (2010) Re-mapping regulatory space: the new governance of Australian dairying. Geoforum 41(3):410–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner PD (1996) European occupation of the Victorian Alps. Ngarak Press, Ensay

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy 31(8–9):1257–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW (2010) Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Res Policy 39(4):495–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray I, Lawrence G (2001) A future for regional Australia: escaping global misfortune. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson R, Richards C, Rose N (eds) (2013) The peoples’ food plan: a common-sense approach to a tasty, resilient and fair food system for all Australians: policy directions. Australian Food Sovereignty Alliance, Kambah, ACT

  • Greider T, Garkovich L (1994) Landscapes: the social construction of nature and the environment. Rural Sociol 59(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs CC (2014) Transitions to sustainability: a change in thinking about food systems change? Agric Hum Values 31(1):143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes J (2006) Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: Gaps in the research agenda. J Rural Stud 22(2):142–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horizon2020 (2013). Horizon2020 future scenarios for the Australian Dairy Industry: final report to the project board from the working group, January 2013. Dairy Australia, Melbourne. Retrieved 16 Aug 2013, from http://www.dairyaustralia.com.au/Industry-overview/About-the-industry/Recent-industry-topics/Horizon-2020-project-future-dairy-scenarios.aspx

  • Hunt L, Rosin CJ, Campbell H, Fairweather J (2013) The impact of neo-liberalism on New Zealand farmers: changing what it means to be a ‘good farmer’. Ext Farming Syst J 9:34–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison R, Blackmore C, Iaquinto BL (2013) Towards systemic and adaptive governance: exploring the revealing and concealing aspects of contemporary social-learning metaphors. Ecol Econ 87:34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence G, Campbell H (2014) Neoliberalism in the antipodes: understanding the influence and limits of the neoliberal political project. In: Wolf SA, Bonanno A (eds) The neoliberal regime in the agri-food sector: crisis, resilience, and restructuring. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 263–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence G, Richards C, Lyons K (2013) Food security in Australia in an era of neoliberalism, productivism and climate change. J Rural Stud 29:30–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Liepins R (2000) Exploring rurality through `community’: discourses, practices and spaces shaping Australian and New Zealand rural `communities’. J Rural Stud 16(3):325–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linehan V, Thorpe S, Andrews N, Kim Y, Beaini F (2012). Food demand to 2050: opportunities for Australian agriculture. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences, Canberra. Retrieved 29 Sept 2012, from http://adl.brs.gov.au/data/warehouse/Outlook2012/fdi50d9abat001201203/Outlook2012FoodDemand2050.pdf

  • Marsden T (2013a) From post-productionism to reflexive governance: contested transitions in securing more sustainable food futures. J Rural Stud 29:123–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden T (2013b) Sustainable place-making for sustainability science: the contested case of agri-food and urban–rural relations. Sustain Sci 8(2):213–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden T, Sonnino R (2012) Human health and wellbeing and the sustainability of urban–regional food systems. Curr Opin Env Sustain 4(4):427–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin DG (2003) “Place-framing” as place-making: constituting a neighborhood for organizing and activism. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 93(3):730–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey D (2005) For space. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre BD, Herren H, Wakhungu J, Watson R (eds) (2009) International assessment of agricultural knowledge, science and technology for development (IAASTD): global report. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus P, Walmsley J, Argent N, Baum S, Bourke L, Martin J, Pritchard B, Sorensen T (2012) Rural community and rural resilience: what is important to farmers in keeping their country towns alive? J Rural Stud 28(1):20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitta Valley Heritage Society (2003). Eskdale Butter Factory Co. Ltd. 1903–1968: research from the minute books. Mitta Valley Heritage Society, Eskdale

  • Mulvany J (2010). Future Dairy Supply for the Alpine Valleys North East Victoria. Unpublished report prepared for the Alpine Valleys Agribusiness Forum, On Farm Consulting Pty Ltd

  • OVOF (2013) Mitta Valley Community Plan 2013–2016, our valley, our future. Retrieved 9 Apr 2014, from http://www.ourvalley.com.au/news/22-our-valley-our-future-plan.html

  • Panelli R, Welch R (2005) Why community? Reading difference and singularity with community. Env Plan A 37(9):1589–1611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce J, Martin DG, Murphy JT (2011) Relational place-making: the networked politics of place. Trans Inst Br Geogr 36(1):54–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosin CJ, Stock P, Campbell H (2012) Conclusions: towards a more just and flexible global food system. In: Rosin CJ, Stock P, Campbell H (eds) Food systems failure: the global food crisis and the future of agriculture. Earthscan, New York, pp 219–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosin C (2013) Food security and the justification of productivism in New Zealand. J Rural Stud 29:50–58

    Google Scholar 

  • RRC (2012). Inquiry into the capacity of the farming sector to attract and retain young farmers and respond to an ageing workforce. Final report. Rural and Regional Committee, Parliament of Victoria, Melbourne

  • Santhanam-Martin M, Nettle R (2014) Governing Australia’s dairy farm workforce: a new terrain for negotiating rural community sustainability. Int J Sociol Agric Food 21(1):31–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Tregear A (2011) Progressing knowledge in alternative and local food networks: Critical reflections and a research agenda. J Rural Stud 27(4):419–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the steering committees of the Alpine Valleys Dairy Pathways Project and the Our Valley, Our Future project, and all our interviewees, for agreeing to participate in this research. Thanks to Ruth Beilin, Iris Bohnet and Fiona Miller for their contributions to the development of the ideas in this paper. Thanks also to the RIRG writing group and to two anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Santhanam-Martin.

Additional information

Handled by Ruth Beilin, The University of Melbourne, Australia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santhanam-Martin, M., Ayre, M. & Nettle, R. Community sustainability and agricultural landscape change: insights into the durability and vulnerability of the productivist regime. Sustain Sci 10, 207–217 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0268-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0268-2

Keywords

Navigation